No matter how much you study, it can be difficult to feel confident going into the Administering Windows Server (AZ-802) exam. However, there are a few things you can do to help ease your anxiety and boost your chances of success. First, make sure you prepare with Real AZ-802 Exam Dumps. If there are any concepts you're unsure of, take the time to take AZ-802 practice exams until you feel comfortable.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Manage hybrid compute and virtualization | - Containers
|
| Topic 2: Secure Windows Server hybrid infrastructures | - Security configuration
|
| Topic 3: Monitoring and troubleshooting | - System monitoring
|
| Topic 4: Disaster recovery and migration | - Migration scenarios
|
| Topic 5: Networking and storage infrastructure | - Storage management
|
| Topic 6: Implement and manage high availability | - Load balancing and redundancy
|
>> Latest AZ-802 Test Questions <<
In the worst-case scenario, if our content fails to deliver and does not match well with your expectations, you can always redeem your paid amount back as we offer a full money-back guarantee (terms and conditions apply). We know that with each passing day syllabus of AZ-802 Exam modifies and different inclusions are added. So to combat such problems, we offer regular updates for 1 year straight for free after initial payment to make sure our candidates receive the most up-to-date content for their authentic and safe preparation.
NEW QUESTION # 488
You have an on-premises server named Server1 that runs Windows Server. Server1 contains an app named App1 and a firewall named Firewall1. You have an Azure subscription. Internal users connect to App1 by using WebSockets. You need to make App1 available to users on the internet. The solution must minimize the number of inbound ports open on Firewall1. What should you include in the solution?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Relay ' s Hybrid Connections feature is designed specifically to expose an on-premises application, such as App1, to the internet without opening any inbound ports on the on-premises firewall: a small Hybrid Connection Manager agent installed on-premises establishes an outbound-only connection to the Azure Relay service, and internet clients then reach the on-premises app through that relay, so Firewall1 needs no new inbound rules at all -- the connection is entirely outbound-initiated from the on-premises side. Hybrid Connections also natively supports WebSockets-based traffic, matching how internal users already connect to App1. Microsoft Application Request Routing (ARR) is an IIS extension for reverse-proxying and load- balancing HTTP(S) traffic; using it to expose App1 to the internet would still require opening an inbound port on Firewall1 for the reverse proxy to receive traffic, unless combined with something like Azure Relay, so it does not meet the " minimize inbound ports " requirement on its own. Web Application Proxy is an on- premises AD FS/pre-authentication reverse proxy role that also requires an inbound-facing listener and open firewall ports to accept traffic from the internet. Azure Application Gateway is an Azure-hosted load balancer
/WAF that operates on resources already reachable from Azure (such as VMs or on-premises endpoints reachable via VPN/ExpressRoute); it does not eliminate the need for inbound connectivity to an on-premises firewall the way Azure Relay ' s outbound-only model does. Therefore, Azure Relay (Hybrid Connections) is the correct inclusion.
NEW QUESTION # 489
You have an on-premises datacenter named DC1. You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table: VNet1 (Virtual network), contoso.com (Azure Private DNS zone, linked to VNet1), Server1 (Virtual machine -- runs Windows Server, connects to VNet1, has the DNS Server role installed, resolves names for contoso.com by using a conditional forwarder), ER1 (ExpressRoute circuit, connects DC1 and VNet1). You plan to perform the following actions: * Provision an Azure DNS Private Resolver named PR1 on VNet1. * Migrate Server1 to the on-premises datacenter. You need to ensure that once Server1 is migrated to the datacenter, the server can resolve names for entries created in contoso.com.
What should you do?
Azure resource table
Answer: D
Explanation:
An Azure Private DNS zone such as contoso.com is only directly resolvable by resources inside a virtual network it is linked to; once Server1 is migrated out of VNet1 to the on-premises datacenter, it loses that direct resolution path and needs a route back into Azure to reach the private zone ' s records. An Azure DNS Private Resolver ' s inbound endpoint is specifically designed to provide an IP address inside the VNet that on- premises DNS infrastructure (reachable via the existing ExpressRoute circuit, ER1) can send queries to for names in the linked private zone. Since Server1 already runs the DNS Server role and already has a conditional forwarder configured for contoso.com (previously usable while Server1 was inside the VNet), the necessary follow-up action after migration is to modify that existing conditional forwarder so it points at PR1 ' s inbound endpoint IP address, letting Server1 continue resolving contoso.com entries by forwarding those specific queries over ER1 into Azure. Creating a secondary zone on Server1 would not work, since Azure Private DNS zones do not support zone transfers (AXFR/IXFR) at all. Creating an outbound endpoint on PR1, or a DNS forwarding ruleset associated with an outbound endpoint, are both mechanisms for resolving external (for example, on-premises) namespaces from within Azure -- the opposite direction of what ' s needed here, which is on-premises resolution of an Azure-hosted private zone. Therefore, modifying Server1 ' s conditional forwarder for contoso.com to target PR1 ' s inbound endpoint is the correct action.
NEW QUESTION # 490
You have two servers named Host1 and Host2 that run Windows Server 2022 and are members of a workgroup named Contoso. Both servers have the Hyper-V server role installed and are identical in hardware and configuration. Host1 contains three virtual machines. Each server is located in a separate site that connects by using a high-speed WAN link. You need to replicate the virtual machines from Host1 to Host2 for a disaster recovery solution. Which three actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer: A,E,F
Explanation:
Because Host1 and Host2 are members of a workgroup rather than joined to an Active Directory domain, Kerberos authentication cannot be used for Hyper-V Replica, since Kerberos fundamentally depends on domain trust relationships that do not exist between workgroup-joined machines. In a workgroup or cross- domain scenario, Hyper-V Replica instead requires certificate-based authentication over HTTPS, together with opening the associated TCP port exceptions in the Windows Firewall so that replication traffic between the two hosts is permitted. Before any virtual machine can be replicated to Host2, that server must first be configured and explicitly enabled as a Replica server, since a Hyper-V host does not accept incoming replication traffic by default. Once Host2 is enabled as a Replica server and certificate-based authentication with the necessary firewall exceptions is in place, replication is then turned on individually for each of the three virtual machines on Host1 by running the Enable Replication wizard against each one. Live Migration is an unrelated high-availability feature used to move a running virtual machine between cluster nodes without downtime, and it plays no role in establishing Hyper-V Replica for disaster recovery, so enabling live migration is not one of the required actions.
NEW QUESTION # 491
You have a failover cluster named Cluster1 that contains three nodes. You plan to add two file server cluster roles named File1 and File2 to Cluster1. File1 will use the File Server for general use role. File2 will use the Scale-Out File Server for application data role. What is the maximum number of nodes for File1 and File2 that can concurrently serve client connections? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
File1: 1. File2: 3.
A File Server for general use cluster role runs in an active-passive configuration: only the single node that currently owns the role can service client connections at any given time, so File1 is limited to one active node at most, regardless of how many total nodes Cluster1 has. A Scale-Out File Server for application data role, by contrast, is purpose-built for continuous availability and allows every node in the cluster to simultaneously own and serve the same shares concurrently over SMB Transparent Failover, so File2 can use all three nodes in Cluster1 at once to serve client connections. This distinction is fundamental to selecting the correct file server role for a given workload: general-use file shares favor the simplicity of standard active-passive failover, while application workloads such as Hyper-V over SMB or SQL Server database files benefit from the scale-out role ' s concurrent, multi-node access pattern and higher aggregate throughput. Therefore, File1 tops out at 1 node while File2 can use all 3 nodes concurrently.
NEW QUESTION # 492
You need to implement alerts for the domain controllers. The solution must meet the technical requirements.
What should you do on the domain controllers, and what should you create on Azure? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
On the domain controllers: Install the Azure Monitor agent. In Azure: Create an Azure Log Analytics workspace.
Centrally managing performance alerts in Azure for on-premises domain controllers is done by connecting those servers to Azure Monitor: the Azure Monitor agent is installed on each domain controller (onboarded to Azure Arc for non-Azure servers, or directly if they are Azure VMs) to collect performance counters and event data, and that telemetry is sent to an Azure Log Analytics workspace, which is the resource that stores the collected data and against which performance-based alert rules are then defined and centrally managed.
Creating a Data Collector Set in Performance Monitor and modifying the Performance Monitor Users group are both local, per-server administrative actions that never send any data to Azure and cannot support central, Azure-based alerting. An Azure SQL database, a Storage Sync Service, and an Azure Storage account are all Azure resources, but none of them is the telemetry store that Azure Monitor ' s alerting pipeline is built on -- only a Log Analytics workspace serves that role. Therefore, installing the Azure Monitor agent on the domain controllers and creating an Azure Log Analytics workspace are the two required actions.
NEW QUESTION # 493
......
Nowadays in this talented society AZ-802 professionals are very popular, but the IMicrosoft area are also very competitive. So many Microsoft professionals through passing difficult AZ-802 Certification exams to stabilize themselves. TestInsides is websites specifically provide convenience for candidates participating in the AZ-802 certification exams.
AZ-802 Simulated Test: https://www.testinsides.top/AZ-802-dumps-review.html