我々JPNTestは最も頼もしいアフターサービスを提供します。あなたはRelativityのRCA問題集をご購入になってから、我々は一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します。その一年の間、我々の専門家たちは毎日RCA問題集の更新を検査しています。もし更新されたら、すぐにお客様を知らせます。お客様の持っているのはずっと最新版のですから、安心でRCA試験を準備することができます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Setup and Management | 30-35% | - Security and Permissions
|
| Search and Analytics | 20-25% | - Search Capabilities
|
| Data Manipulation and Interaction | 25-30% | - Mass Operations and Tools
|
| Data In and Out | 10-15% | - Data Export
|
JPNTestのRelativityのRCA試験トレーニング資料は必要とするすべての人に成功をもたらすことができます。RelativityのRCA試験は挑戦がある認定試験です。現在、書籍の以外にインターネットは知識の宝庫として見られています。JPNTest で、あなたにあなたの宝庫を見つけられます。JPNTest はRelativityのRCA試験に関連する知識が全部含まれていますから、あなたにとって難しい問題を全て解決して差し上げます。
質問 # 57
With email thread visualization ETV, under what conditions does the red exclamation point indicate coding mismatch?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is C. The email and other parent emails in the thread are coded differently. Relativity' s Email thread visualization documentation explains the meaning of the visual warning icons used in the thread display. The red exclamation point is associated with a coding mismatch condition in the thread. In practice, this means related parent emails in the thread have been coded inconsistently, which is exactly the kind of review inconsistency ETV is designed to expose.
This is different from missing attachments, duplicate spare comparison, or a generic "Needs Review" state.
ETV is focused on surfacing thread relationships, inclusiveness, missing emails, and coding consistency across the email conversation. From a Structured Analytics standpoint, the red exclamation point is a QC indicator that reviewers should inspect the thread because coding decisions across parent emails do not align.
Therefore, the correct answer is C .
質問 # 58
What production numbering should be used when reproducing documents with the same Bates numbering?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is D. Existing production numbering . Relativity's official production set documentation states that Existing production numbering should be selected when you want to re-use the Bates numbering fields from a previously run production set . This is the exact numbering option designed for scenarios where documents are being reproduced but must retain the same Bates values from an earlier production. Relativity further explains that this option is appropriate when you need to change the produced images, produce only a subset of documents from the existing production, or otherwise reissue the same produced documents while preserving the prior numbering.
This aligns directly with re-production workflows. Relativity's re-production documentation also notes that re- production jobs reuse the numbering format and Bates numbers from the original productions , reinforcing that the platform supports maintaining the original numbering scheme instead of assigning new Bates values. That is critical in litigation workflows where Bates continuity must be preserved for references in correspondence, court filings, and prior productions. The other options do not fit this requirement. Page level numbering and document field numbering generate or rely on other numbering methods, while original image numbering is not the production numbering choice used for preserving prior Bates values in a re- production. Therefore, when reproducing documents and keeping the same Bates numbering, the correct production numbering method is Existing production numbering .
質問 # 59
What workflow is not supported by Import/Export?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is D. Saved Search import. Relativity's official Import/Export workflow overview states that Import/Export supports unprocessed raw native files , document load files , image load files , production load files , and Relativity Dynamic Objects for import. On the export side, it supports folders , production sets , saved searches , and RDO files . In other words, saved searches are export workflows, not import workflows .
That distinction is important for RCA-level administration because Import/Export is organized around specific import and export pathways. A Saved Search import is not listed as a supported workflow because a saved search is a Relativity object used to define document criteria inside a workspace, not a standard external load-file-based content import. By contrast, document load file import and image load file import are explicitly supported workflows, and Relativity also supports unstructured data import for processing.
Therefore, among the options given, the unsupported Import/Export workflow is Saved Search import . This is consistent with Relativity's current documentation, which shows Saved Search only under export workflows.
質問 # 60
What is the best way to convert an existing workspace in Relativity to a repository workspace?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is D. Install the Repository application to the workspace. Relativity's official repository workspace documentation states that when installed to an existing workspace, the RelativityOne repository workspace application converts the workspace into a streamlined repository workspace for early case assessment and lower-cost storage of data not actively under review. The documentation also provides a dedicated section called Converting a review workspace to a repository workspace , where the conversion steps are simply to access the RelativityOne Repository Workspace application from the Application Library and install the application to the desired workspace .
This makes option D the exact documented conversion method. Option A describes moving data to another repository workspace, which is a different workflow and does not convert the existing workspace itself.
Option B involving ARM restore is used in some repository-related workflows, especially around templates or archived workspaces, but it is not the primary documented method for converting an existing workspace.
Option C is incorrect because repository mode is not enabled by editing a status field. Relativity also notes that if you convert an existing review workspace by installing the Repository application, the workspace remains classified for billing as a review workspace until the beginning of the next calendar month, which further confirms that application installation is the actual conversion mechanism.
質問 # 61
A client sends you a data set they want processed that is comprised entirely of large Excel files. What is the best Excel Text Extraction Method to get the data to review as quickly as possible?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is A. Relativity. Relativity's Processing throughput guidance states that internal performance testing has shown the Relativity text extraction method to be at least two times faster than the native method on Excel, Word, and PowerPoint file types, and also less error-prone than native extraction.
Since the question asks for the best method to get a large Excel-only data set to review as quickly as possible, the documented speed advantage makes Relativity the best answer.
The native-based methods are slower according to that same documentation, even though they may have other use cases. The processing profile documentation also shows that native/failover combinations are available configurations, but the performance guidance specifically favors the Relativity extraction method for speed on Excel files. "Extract and place inline" is not the documented Excel text extraction method choice for this question. Therefore, the fastest and most review-efficient choice for large Excel files is Relativity.
質問 # 62
......
我々JPNTestでは、あなたは一番優秀なRelativity RCA問題集を発見できます。我が社のサービスもいいです。購入した前、弊社はあなたが準備したいRCA試験問題集のサンプルを無料に提供します。購入した後、一年間の無料サービス更新を提供します。Relativity RCA問題集に合格しないなら、180日内で全額返金します。あるいは、他の科目の試験を変えていいです。
RCA関連資格知識: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/RCA-mondaishu