一つには、当社の最も先進的なオペレーションシステムであり、最速の配信速度を保証でき、お客様の個人情報は弊社のオペレーションシステムによって自動的に暗号化されます。また、AI-103の実際の試験のオンラインアプリバージョンを使用すると、あらゆる種類の電子デバイスに関するトレーニング資料の質問を気軽に練習できます。さらに、AI-103試験問題の助けを借りて、お客様の合格率は98％〜100％に達しました。近い将来、あなたの学習パートナーになることを楽しみにしています。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Implement computer vision solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze visual content
|
| Plan and manage Azure AI solutions | 25-30% | - Plan Azure AI resources
|
| Implement agentic solutions | 20-25% | - Manage agent operations
|
| Implement text analysis and information extraction solutions | 10-15% | - Analyze and extract information
|
| Implement generative AI solutions | 25-30% | - Optimize and evaluate models
|
試験を受けることでMicrosoft認定を取得することを期待する人が増えています。ただし、多くの人にとって試験は非常に困難です。特に正しい学習教材を選択せずに適切な方法を見つけた場合、AI-103試験に合格して関連する認定を取得することはより困難になります。関連する認定を効率的な方法で取得したい場合は、当社のAI-103学習教材を選択してください。弊社のAI-103学習教材が試験に合格し、簡単に認定を取得するのに役立ちます。
質問 # 49
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains a customer support agent built by using the Foundry Agent Service.
The agent uploads user-provided screenshots to Azure Storage through a ticketing tool and receives a blob URL for additional reasoning.
You need to use image moderation during agent runs and prevent harmful content from being returned during runs. Azure Al Content Safety must access the images by using the blob URL. The solution must follow the principle of least privilege.
What should you configure for Content Safety? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Guardrails: Select User input, Output, Tool response, and Tool call and set Action to Block.
Storage access: A system-assigned managed identity that is assigned the Storage Blob Data Contributor role The guardrail must be applied to User input, Output, Tool response, and Tool call with the action set to Block . Microsoft Foundry guardrails support four intervention points: user input, tool call, tool response, and output. This scenario includes user-provided screenshots, a ticketing tool that uploads images and returns blob URLs, and final agent responses. Applying blocking controls at all four points ensures harmful image-related content is inspected throughout the agent run and prevented from continuing or being returned to the user.
Microsoft's guardrails guidance also states that tool call and tool response controls are specifically required when harmful content can pass through agent tools.
For storage, configure the Azure AI Content Safety resource with a system-assigned managed identity and grant it Storage Blob Data Contributor on the storage account or container. The Content Safety image moderation quickstart states that images can be supplied by blob storage URL and that the Content Safety resource must be given storage access by enabling its system-assigned managed identity and assigning Storage Blob Data Contributor or Owner; Contributor is the least-privileged valid option shown. Reference topics: Foundry guardrails, agent intervention points, image moderation, managed identity, and Azure Storage RBAC.
質問 # 50
You have an Azure App Service app named App1 and provision a Microsoft Foundry Service resource named CSAccount1.
You need to configure App1 to access CSAccount1. The solution must minimize administrative effort.
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer/Course Guide/topics:
Among the supplied choices, the simplest configuration is the endpoint URI and subscription key .
Azure AI/Cognitive Services resources expose a resource endpoint and access keys. An application can call the appropriate service API and place the subscription key in the expected request header without implementing an OAuth token-acquisition flow or managing certificate authentication. This directly minimizes setup and administrative effort.
A SAS token is associated primarily with services such as Azure Storage and is not the standard authentication mechanism for a Foundry/Azure AI services endpoint.
A system-assigned managed identity is a strong production security option, but an X.509 certificate is not required for normal managed-identity authentication. Consequently option B combines unrelated mechanisms.
OAuth/Microsoft Entra authentication is generally preferable when the requirements prioritize keyless access and RBAC, but it requires identity and role configuration. The question specifically prioritizes minimal administrative effort , and option D represents the direct key-based access mechanism.
For production architectures where secret elimination is required, Microsoft recommends Microsoft Entra ID and managed identities when supported. The AI-103 Study Guide covers both managed identity and other authentication approaches under system security. Microsoft Learn
質問 # 51
You configure Azure AI Content Safety to moderate user-uploaded images in a generative application. During testing, a colleague claims an image returned a Violence severity score of 3.
Why is this result impossible?
正解：D
解説：
The Azure AI Content Safety image model uses a trimmed severity scale that returns only 0, 2, 4, and 6, so an odd value such as 3 cannot occur for image content. The text model uses the full 0 to 7 scale, which is where odd-numbered severities appear.
質問 # 52
Note: This section contains one or more sets of questions with the same scenario and problem. Each question presents a unique solution to the problem. You must determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. More than one solution in the set might solve the problem. It is also possible that none of the solutions in the set solve the problem.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return. As a result, these questions do not appear on the Review Screen.
You have a Microsoft Foundry project that contains an agent. The agent generates summaries from retrieved policy documents.
Users report that some responses omit required regulatory clauses, even when the clauses are present in the retrieved content.
You need to improve response completeness.
Solution: You add a reflection pass that regenerates the response if the required clauses are missing.
Does this meet the goal?
正解：A
解説：
Correct:
* You add a reflection pass that regenerates the response if the required clauses are missing.
This is Self-Correction Strategy: A reflection pass allows an agent to evaluate its own initial output against specified constraints (e.g., checking for the presence of mandatory regulatory clauses). If the required text is missing, the agent triggers a programmatic self-correction or regeneration loop to include them before final delivery.
Incorrect:
* You increase the value of the max_tokens parameter.
Increasing the max_tokens parameter prevents the response from being cut off mid-sentence due to length constraints. However, it does not force the model's logic to explicitly include missing information that it chose to leave out earlier in the text.
* You increase the value of the temperature parameter.
Raising the temperature parameter increases randomness and creativity. For rigid compliance tasks like summarizing regulatory documents, higher temperature actually increases the risk of hallucination and omission.
* You run an evaluation flow that scores responses for completeness and blocks responses that fall below a defined threshold.
Evaluation Flow Block: Running an evaluation flow to score completeness and blocking bad responses identifies and stops low-quality outputs, but it does not fix or actively improve the response completeness. It simply filters failures out of the system.
Reference:
https://pub.towardsai.net/reflection-with-llm-how-to-make-ai-review-its-own-work-2db122fca1d8
質問 # 53
Case Study 1 - Contoso, Ltd
Overview
Company Information
Contoso, Ltd is a multinational retail company that builds, deploys, and manages generative AI and agent-based solutions by using Microsoft Foundry.
Existing Environment
Identity Environment
Contoso uses Microsoft Entra ID for identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities that enable agents to access organizational resources and services.
Contoso recently formed a new AI engineering team named Agent1Dev Team to optimize and maintain existing AI solutions.
The team collaborates with solution architects, DevOps engineers, and security engineers to design, implement. monitor, and secure AI applications.
Contoso also has a team named Agent1Test Team that is responsible for validating AI solutions before the solution deployments.
Generative Environment
Contoso has a Microsoft Foundry deployment that contains two projects named Project1 and Project2.
Project1
Project1 contains a customer support agent named Agent1 that assists customers with product inquiries and troubleshooting requests.
Agent1 has the following configurations:
- Agent1 uses a base model deployment.
- A safety evaluation pipeline is NOT enabled.
- Tool invocation approval workflows are NOT enabled.
- Conversation memory constraints are NOT configured.
Agent1 interacts with customers by using digital support channels and answers general questions about Contoso products.
Project1 is deployed to an Azure region located in the European Union (EU).
Agent1Dev Team will use Project1 to optimize and maintain Agent1.
Project2
Project2 contains a deployed video generation model. The marketing department at Contoso has access to Project2 and plans to use the model to develop a video creation solution.
Development of the solution is incomplete.
Data Environment
Contoso stores product-related information in Azure resources that support AI applications.
The Azure environment contains an Azure Blob Storage account named storage1 that stores product detail sheets for all the Contoso products.
The product sheets include specifications, feature descriptions, and product support information that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions. The product sheets are stored in the PDF format.
Problem Statements
Contoso identifies the following issues:
- Agent1 has only general knowledge of the Contoso products.
- A recent chat interaction with Agent1 was analyzed for sentiment. The results of the analysis have NOT been processed yet.
- Agent1 does NOT use the detailed product information in the product sheets stored in storage1 when responding to customer questions.
- The finance department at Contoso reports that vendor invoices must be reviewed manually to ensure that the invoices match the terms defined in the vendor contracts. The invoices contain tables, logos, and varied layouts that make the documents difficult to process consistently.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to implement the following changes:
- Implement a solution for Project1 that analyzes the vendor invoices by evaluating both the visual layout and the textual content of the invoices, so that the invoice details can be verified against the vendor contract terms.
- Update the base model deployment used by Agent1 and standardize the model version to ensure continuity and consistent responses.
- Enable Agent1 to retrieve and use the detailed product information from the product sheets stored in storage1.
- Implement an indexing solution for the product sheets that Agent1 can use to answer customer questions.
- Complete the development of the video creation solution.
Technical Requirements
Contoso identifies the following technical requirements:
- The model deployment used by Agent1 must support scalable, high-throughput generative AI workloads and dynamically scale to handle variable customer support traffic, without requiring reserved throughput capacity.
- The product sheets must be processed by using an indexing pipeline that enables semantic and vector search, so that Agent1 can retrieve the relevant product information.
- Responses generated by using the product sheet information must be relevant, complete, and accurate.
- Agent1 must be able to use the product sheets to answer natural language questions about product details.
- The model version used by Agent1 must remain consistent to ensure stable responses.
- The data processed by the model must remain within the EU.
Security and Compliance Requirements
Contoso identifies the following security and compliance requirements:
- API keys must NOT be used to access Foundry-deployed models.
- Access to the Azure resources must follow the principle of least privilege.
- The developers at Contoso must authenticate to Microsoft Foundry resources by using Microsoft Entra authentication.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Dev Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Dev.
- Access to Project1 must be assigned to the members of Agent1Test Team by using a security group named SC_Agent1_Test.
- Agent1 must never reveal customer information, even if a document that contains customer data is added erroneously to the product sheet repository in storage1.
- The product sheets might contain images that include embedded text. Agent1 must be protected from malicious instructions potentially hidden within the images.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
- Users that interact with Agent1 must have a personalized experience in future interactions, including the ability for Agent1 to retain conversation context and recall relevant information from previous interactions.
- Agent1 must answer questions only about the products sold by Contoso.
You need to configure personalized user interactions for Agent1. The solution must meet the business requirements.
What should you include in the solution?
正解：A
解説：
Scenario, Business Requirements:
*-> Users that interact with Agent1 must have a personalized experience in future interactions, including the ability for Agent1 to retain conversation context and recall relevant information from previous interactions.
Agent1 must answer questions only about the products sold by Contoso.
To configure personalized user interactions that retain context and recall previous information, you should use the Memory in Foundry Agent Service.
Managed Long-Term Memory: This allows the agent to extract meaningful information from user conversations and store it as durable knowledge (e.g., user preferences or historical details) to be recalled across future interactions.
Scoped Memory Stores: By using the scope parameter when creating memory stores, you can segment memories to ensure a secure, personalized experience for distinct users.
Automatic Injection: The agent will automatically inject these learned facts and user profile details into the prompt before new interactions, eliminating the need to rehydrate context manually.
References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/agents/concepts/what-is-memory
質問 # 54
......
クライアントが厄介な問題に遭遇した場合、専門家にAI-103試験問題に関する長距離支援を提供するよう依頼します。カスタマーサービススタッフは1日と1年中働いているため、安心してカスタマーサービススタッフがオフラインになることを心配しないでください。また、クライアントは、思いやりのある快適なサービスをお楽しみいただけます。その後、専門家チームがそれらを入念に処理し、テストバンクにまとめます。 Googleのシステムは、定期的にAI-103試験実践ガイドの最新アップデートをお客様に送信します。
AI-103認証資格: https://www.xhs1991.com/AI-103.html