Get the Most Recent Cisco 300-420 Exam Questions for Guaranteed Success

What's more, part of that DumpsFree 300-420 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=13nBdsh3mVYklncEdxoe4s0DDO9FdWoPx

No matter when you need help on our 300-420 training questions, the after-sale service staffs in our company share a passion for you, an intense focus on teamwork, speed and agility, and a commitment to trust and respect for all individuals. At present, our company is a leading global provider of 300-420 Preparation exam in the international market. And as you know, the first-class quality comes with the first-class service. So you will find our 300-420 is the best in every detail!

Cisco 300-420 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Objectives
Topic 1: Network Automation and Programmability	- API-driven network automation concepts - Controller-based networking design
Topic 2: WAN and Edge Connectivity Design	- SD-WAN architecture and design considerations - Traditional WAN and internet edge design
Topic 3: Enterprise Network Design Principles	- Scalability and high availability design - Design methodologies and best practices
Topic 4: Security Design in Enterprise Networks	- VPN and perimeter security architecture - Segmentation and access control design
Topic 5: Network Services Design	- Routing protocols design (OSPF, EIGRP, BGP) - Multicast and QoS design considerations
Topic 6: Enterprise Campus Network Design	- Campus LAN architecture - Spine-leaf and hierarchical design models

>> Passing 300-420 Score Feedback <<

300-420 Actual Dumps | Reliable 300-420 Dumps

DumpsFree is one of the only few platforms offering updated Cisco exam preparatory products for the 300-420 at an affordable rate. Our Cisco 300-420 exam questions preparation products help you know your weaknesses before the actual Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks exam. Cisco 300-420 Exam Questions preparation materials are affordable for everyone. Moreover, we give you free updates for 365 days. DumpsFree offers reliable, updated Cisco Exam Questions at an affordable price and also gives a 30% discount on all Cisco exam questions.

Cisco Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks Sample Questions (Q359-Q364):

NEW QUESTION # 359
Drag and Drop Question
Drag and drop the types of WAN connectivity from the left onto the connectivity use cases on the right.

Answer:

Explanation:

NEW QUESTION # 360
A company's branch location uses redundant routers and links for connectivity to the headquarters. Also, to use the entire available bandwidth, the branch uses a dynamic routing protocol. An architect must design a multicast streaming solution to avoid RPF check failures because of the current network design. Which deployment model must the architect choose?

A. PIM-BSR
B. PIM-SSM
C. PIM-SM
D. BIDIR-PIM

Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 361
An engineer is designing a Layer 3 campus network running EIGRP between the core, aggregation, and access layers. The access layer switches will be connected to the aggregation layer using Layer 3 copper connections. The engineer wants to improve convergence time for access layer switch failures. Which technique must the design include?

A. EIGRP summarization from core to aggregation layer
B. enabling BFD for EIGRP on the access layer uplinks
C. reducing the EIGRP Hello / Hold timer values
D. EIGRP summarization from access to aggregation layer

Answer: B

Explanation:
BFD for EIGRP is the strongest design option for improving convergence after access-layer switch or uplink failure on Layer 3 links. EIGRP hello and hold timers can detect failures, but aggressive timer reduction increases control-plane chatter and still may not provide consistent subsecond detection across platforms.
Cisco BFD is specifically designed to provide rapid forwarding-path failure detection for routing protocols, including EIGRP, independent of the routing protocol hello mechanism. On point-to-point Layer 3 uplinks, BFD can notify EIGRP quickly when a neighbor path fails, allowing DUAL to react without waiting for the EIGRP hold timer. Summarization from access to aggregation is useful for query scoping and stability, but it does not directly detect an access switch failure faster. Summarization from core to aggregation has even less relevance to access uplink failure detection. Therefore, the design should enable BFD for EIGRP on the access-layer uplinks, with timer values chosen carefully according to platform capability and operational stability. Reference topics: EIGRP convergence, BFD, routed access, failure detection, DUAL.

NEW QUESTION # 362
Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer must design a WAN solution so that ISP-1 is always preferred over ISP-2. The path via ISP-2 is considered as a backup and must be used only when the path to ISP-1 is down. Which solution must the engineer choose?

A. R1:
- Routes advertised to ISP-1: 0x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-1: LOW local-preference
- Routes advertised to R2: community NO-ADVERTISE
- Routes received from R2: no action
R2:
- Routes advertised to ISP-2: 5x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-2: HIGH local-preference
- Routes advertised to R1: no action
- Routes received from R1: community NO-ADVERTISE
B. R1:
- Routes advertised to ISP-1: 0x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-1: HIGH local-preference
- Routes advertised to R2: community NO-EXPORT
- Routes received from R2: no action
R2:
- Routes advertised to ISP-2: 5x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-2: LOW local-preference
- Routes advertised to R1: no action
- Routes received from R1: no action
C. R1:
- Routes advertised to ISP-1: 5x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-1: LOW local-preference
- Routes advertised to R2: community NO-ADVERTISE
- Routes received from R2: no action
R2:
- Routes advertised to ISP-2: 0x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-2: HIGH local-preference
- Routes advertised to R1: community NO-EXPORT
- Routes received from R1: no action
D. R1:
- Routes advertised to ISP-1: 0x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-1: HIGH local-preference
- Routes advertised to R2: no action
- Routes received from R2: community NO-EXPORT
R2:
- Routes advertised to ISP-2:5x AS-path prepend
- Routes received from ISP-2: LOW local-preference
- Routes advertised to R1: community NO-ADVERTISE
- Routes received from R1: no action

Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 363
An engineer must design an in-band management solution for a customer with branch sites. The solution must allow remote management of the branch sites using management protocols over an MPLS WAN. Queueing is implemented at the remote sites using these classes:

How must the solution prioritize the management traffic over the WAN?

A. Mark the traffic with DSCP CS2 and map into Class2 with a minimum bandwidth assigned by reducing the bandwidth available to Class3
B. Mark the traffic with DSCP CS6 and map into Class1 with a minimum bandwidth assigned by reducing the bandwidth available to Class2
C. Mark the traffic with DSCP CS1 and map into Class2 with a minimum bandwidth assigned by reducing the bandwidth available to CIass3.
D. Mark the traffic with DSCP EF and map into Class1 with a minimum bandwidth assigned by reducing the bandwidth available to Class2.

Answer: A

Explanation:
For in-band management over the production WAN, the proper marking is DSCP CS2 mapped into the management or operations class with a minimum bandwidth guarantee. Cisco enterprise QoS guidance separates network control traffic from network management traffic. Routing protocol and control-plane traffic should not be diluted by ordinary management flows. CS6 is typically reserved for routing and network- control traffic; EF is reserved for low-latency voice bearer traffic; CS1 is commonly used for scavenger or low-priority traffic. Network management flows such as SSH, SNMP, NTP, FTP-based maintenance, and syslog require reliable delivery, but they should not starve business traffic or real-time services. Therefore, marking with CS2 and mapping the traffic into Class2 is the correct design choice. The bandwidth adjustment should come from a lower-priority class, not from the routing/control or real-time class. Because this is in- band management, the architect must also ensure access control, source restrictions, AAA, logging, and management-plane protection. QoS classification alone does not secure management access; it only gives the traffic an appropriate forwarding treatment over the MPLS WAN. Reference topics: in-band management, DSCP CS2, enterprise QoS classes, management-plane traffic.

NEW QUESTION # 364
......

DumpsFree is a reliable site offering the 300-420 valid study material supported by 100% pass rate and full money back guarantee. Besides, our 300-420 training material is with the high quality and can simulate the actual test environment, which make you feel in the real test situation. You can get the latest information about the 300-420 real test, because our DumpsFree will give you one year free update. You can be confident to face any difficulties in the 300-420 actual test no matter any changes.

300-420 Actual Dumps: https://www.dumpsfree.com/300-420-valid-exam.html

BONUS!!! Download part of DumpsFree 300-420 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=13nBdsh3mVYklncEdxoe4s0DDO9FdWoPx