Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험대비최신덤프모음집 & SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 100％시험패스공부자료

Itcertkr의 Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험덤프는 실제시험의 기출문제와 예상문제를 묶어둔 공부자료로서 시험문제커버율이 상당히 높습니다.IT업계에 계속 종사하려는 IT인사들은 부단히 유력한 자격증을 취득하고 자신의 자리를 보존해야 합니다. Itcertkr의 Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험덤프로 어려운 Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험을 쉽게 패스해보세요. IT자격증 취득이 여느때보다 여느일보다 쉬워져 자격증을 많이 따는 꿈을 실현해드립니다.

Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports10-15%- Configuration management for optimization
- Automated optimization features
- Nokia NetAct and performance tools
- Report generation and interpretation
SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals15-20%- Radio access concepts and principles
- SRAN network architecture overview
- Single RAN integration principles
- SRAN solution components and functions
Radio Network Performance Monitoring20-25%- Threshold configuration and alerting
- Performance data collection and analysis
- KPI definition and measurement
- Real-time network monitoring techniques
- Performance monitoring tools and dashboards
Radio Network Optimization Techniques25-30%- Coverage optimization methods
- Interference analysis and mitigation
- Capacity optimization strategies
- Load balancing techniques
- Parameter tuning best practices
- Handover optimization
Performance Troubleshooting20-25%- Optimization case studies
- Troubleshooting tools utilization
- Root cause analysis methodologies
- Network failure identification and resolution
- Common performance issues diagnosis

>> Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험대비 최신 덤프모음집 <<

SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 100％시험패스 공부자료 - SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization인증시험자료

Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험이 너무 어려워 보여서 오르지못할 산처럼 보이시나요? 그건Itcertkr의 Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험문제에 대비하여 제작한Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization덤프가 있다는 것을 모르고 있기때문입니다. Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험에 도전하고 싶으시다면 최강 시험패스율로 유명한Itcertkr의 Nokia인증 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization덤프로 시험공부를 해보세요.시간절약은 물론이고 가격도 착해서 간단한 시험패스에 딱 좋은 선택입니다.

최신 MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 무료샘플문제 (Q11-Q16):

질문 # 11
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.

정답：C

설명：
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.


질문 # 12
Which of these is a software solution targeted to provide NPO projects access to rich datasets, modern data analysis and visualization tools, with a high level of automation capability?

정답：D

설명：
The correct answer is D .
NPAS is the correct software solution in this context. A public technical source describes NPAS as providing access to rich datasets and modern data analysis and visualization tools , which matches the wording of the question closely.
In Nokia/NPO project context, this type of platform is used to support network planning and optimization activities by enabling data ingestion, analysis, visualization, and automation. This helps engineers work with large RAN datasets more efficiently during optimization, modernization, and performance-improvement projects.
The other options are not the best match:
GeoSynthesis is more associated with geospatial/planning-style use cases.
MantaRay SON is related to SON automation and optimization functions.
LTEPAT is more LTE-focused and does not match the described broad analytics platform role.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
NPAS.


질문 # 13
At which mark are all conditions fulfilled for energy saving , so the cell will be switched off? Refer to the image below.

정답：D

설명：
The correct answer is B , which corresponds to mark C in the diagram.
In the diagram, the energy-saving process follows these stages:
Before mark B , the cell is entering the power-saving period, but the required load condition has not yet been satisfied for the required duration.
At mark B , the measured load has gone below the configured threshold, but the cell is not switched off immediately. The system must confirm that the load remains below the required threshold for the configured time.
At mark C , the load has stayed below the required threshold for the required duration, shown as 5 minutes in the diagram. At this point, all conditions are fulfilled, and the cell can be switched off. The diagram also shows the state becoming:
energySavingState = energySaving
Marks D and E are already inside or near the later part of the power-saving period. Mark E is associated with operator suspension/exit behavior, not the initial moment when all switch-off conditions are first fulfilled.


질문 # 14
When selecting an LTE anchor layer for EN-DC , why is it important to check 3GPP band combinations ?

정답：A

설명：
The correct answer is B .
In 5G NSA EN-DC , the UE connects to LTE as the Master Cell Group , or anchor, and NR as the Secondary Cell Group . Not every LTE band can be paired with every NR band. The supported LTE-NR combinations are defined by 3GPP band-combination rules and must also be supported by the UE chipset and device capability.
For example, an operator may have LTE Band 3, Band 7, or Band 20 and NR n78, but only certain LTE-NR combinations may be valid for EN-DC. If the selected LTE anchor band is not supported in combination with the NR band, the UE will not be able to establish EN-DC even if LTE and NR coverage both exist.
Option C is not correct because dual-uplink support depends on UE capability and specific band-combination support; it cannot be guaranteed for all UE models. Option A and D are unrelated to the main purpose of checking 3GPP band combinations.
So the correct reason is:
To ensure that LTE and NR bands are compatible and allowed as EN-DC pairs.


질문 # 15
In a high-mobility network, the maximum cell size must be restricted to 33 km . Which PRACH format and restricted-set type should be used?

정답：D

설명：
The correct answer is Format 1 / Type B .
For PRACH planning, the selected preamble format must support the required cell radius. Format 0 is too short for a 33 km cell because it is typically suitable only up to around 14.5 km . Format 2 is also not suitable because its practical maximum cell radius is around 29.5 km , which is below the required 33 km . Therefore, a longer PRACH format is needed.
Because the scenario mentions high mobility , an unrestricted PRACH set is not preferred. High-mobility environments require a restricted set to handle Doppler effects and reduce ambiguity in PRACH preamble detection. Between the restricted-set options, Type B is the correct choice for this 33 km high-mobility case.
A matching Nokia-style question source also lists this exact scenario with Format 1 / Type B as option A.


질문 # 16
......

Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 시험환경에 적응하고 싶은 분은 pdf버전 구매시 온라인버전 또는 테스트엔진 버전을 추가구매하시면 됩니다. 문제는 pdf버전의 문제와 같지만 pdf버전의 문제를 마스터한후 실력테스 가능한 프로그램이기에Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization시험환경에 익숙해져 시험을 보다 릴렉스한 상태에서 볼수 있습니다.

SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization 100％시험패스 공부자료: https://www.itcertkr.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization_exam.html