It-Passportsテストトレントを学習し、試験の準備をするのに20〜30時間しかかかりません。 CPHRM試験問題を購入した後、CPHRM試験トレントを学習し、主に仕事、家庭生活、学習に専念するために数時間を費やすだけです。 CPHRM試験問題の回答と質問は入念に選択され、試験の焦点をつかむため、試験の学習と準備に多くの時間を節約できます。合格率は98％以上と高いため、CPHRMガイドトレントを購入することで安心できます。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
CPHRM試験トレーニングの開発者は、受験者の視点に立って、各ユーザーがCPHRM学習教材を調整するための条件を満たします。さらに、CPHRMガイドの質問はどんどん安くなっており、より多く購入してより多くお届けします。購入する顧客が多いほど、割引は大きくなります。 CPHRMの実際の試験ガイドの優位性をユーザーに提供するために、思いやりのあるサービスも提供します。ユーザーはCPHRMの学習教材に関連する質問があり、すぐにスタッフの助けを得ることができますマナー。
質問 # 89
An organization's chief of orthopedics has scheduled an implant of a new artificial hip for the next day. The chief developed the artificial hip while working as a consultant for a medical device company. The device has not yet been approved by the FDA or the Institutional Review Board. The risk manager's best immediate course of action is to
正解：C
解説：
Under Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, the implantation of a medical device that lacks FDA approval and Institutional Review Board oversight presents significant legal and regulatory violations. Use of an unapproved device outside of an approved investigational protocol may violate federal regulations governing human subject research and medical device approval processes.
The risk manager's primary responsibility is to immediately mitigate regulatory and liability exposure.
Because the procedure is scheduled for the next day, urgent intervention is required. Contacting the FDA would not resolve the immediate risk. Verifying informed consent is insufficient, as patient consent cannot legitimize use of an unapproved device outside regulatory pathways. Calling a special IRB meeting would not retroactively authorize an unapproved device without appropriate investigational device exemption processes.
Escalating the issue to the chief of surgery to halt or cancel the procedure is the most appropriate immediate step. This ensures that organizational leadership addresses the compliance violation before patient harm occurs. Risk management objectives emphasize proactive prevention of regulatory breaches, protection of patient safety, and preservation of institutional integrity. Therefore, stopping the procedure is the correct and immediate action.
質問 # 90
An employer is not required to offer a reasonable accommodation to a job applicant with a qualified disability unless
正解：C
解説：
Under Health Care Risk Management principles aligned with ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities. However, the obligation to provide accommodation is generally triggered when the applicant or employee makes the employer aware of the need for accommodation.
The interactive process required by the ADA begins once the applicant requests an accommodation or discloses a need related to a disability. Employers are not required to speculate about potential disabilities or initiate accommodations without notice. While documentation may be requested to verify the disability in certain circumstances, proof is not the triggering requirement. Instead, the request itself initiates the employer' s duty to engage in good faith discussion to determine reasonable accommodation.
Withholding accommodation that creates an unsafe condition may raise separate workplace safety concerns, but that is not the threshold requirement under the ADA. Similarly, an employer's recognition alone does not automatically impose an obligation absent a request or clear disclosure.
Legal and regulatory objectives emphasize proper documentation, consistent application of ADA standards, and engagement in the interactive process once accommodation is requested. Therefore, the employer's duty arises when the applicant requests the accommodation.
質問 # 91
An appropriate way to complete the verification read-back of a complete order, as required by The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals, is to have the person receiving the order
正解：A
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards supported by ASHRM and The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals, the read-back process is designed to ensure accurate communication of verbal or telephone orders. The correct process requires the person receiving the order to first write down the complete order and then read it back to the prescribing practitioner for verification.
Writing the order down before reading it back reduces reliance on memory and decreases the risk of omission or transcription errors. The practitioner who gave the order must then confirm that the read-back is accurate.
This closed-loop communication process enhances patient safety and reduces medication and treatment errors associated with miscommunication.
Immediately repeating the information without documenting it does not meet the full verification requirement, as the written record must be confirmed. A witness is not required under the standard. Documenting the date and time is necessary for proper charting but does not constitute completion of the read-back verification itself.
Clinical and patient safety objectives emphasize clear, structured communication processes. Therefore, writing the information down before reading it back is the appropriate method to complete the verification process.
質問 # 92
When conducting an investigation of a liability claim, which of the following steps should be included?
* providing the RCA to the insurance company
* determining the applicable standard of care
* assessing the applicable legal principles
* obtaining an incident report from the claimant
正解：C
解説：
According to Health Care Risk Management standards established by ASHRM and the American Hospital Association Certification Center, investigation of a liability claim requires careful evaluation of both clinical and legal components. Determining the applicable standard of care is essential to assess whether the provider' s actions met accepted professional practice. This typically involves review of medical records, consultation with clinical experts, and comparison to established guidelines or customary practices within the specialty.
Assessing applicable legal principles is also critical. This includes analysis of duty, breach, causation, and damages, as well as jurisdiction-specific statutes of limitation, comparative negligence standards, and evidentiary considerations. Understanding the legal framework allows the risk manager to evaluate exposure and advise counsel appropriately.
Providing a root cause analysis to the insurance company may compromise privilege protections, depending on jurisdiction and policy structure. RCA documents are often protected under peer review or patient safety statutes and should not be disclosed without legal guidance. Obtaining an incident report from the claimant is not appropriate, as internal incident reports are generated by the organization and are not requested from claimants.
Claims and litigation objectives emphasize structured legal and clinical evaluation. Therefore, determining the standard of care and assessing applicable legal principles are required investigative steps.
質問 # 93
A 22-year-old man has been treated at a hospital for a psychiatric condition. His mother requests that a copy of the patient's medical record be released to her. The risk manager's advice to the medical records department should be to
正解：C
質問 # 94
......
CPHRM試験の参考資料のユーザーは、専門家、学生、高度な文化の学生など、幅広い分野をカバーしています。これは、CPHRM学習教材の言語形式が理解しやすいためです。どんな情報を勉強しても、初心者であることやデータを読んでいないことを心配する必要はありません。そして、CPHRMテストの質問は多くの専門家によって準備されています。 CPHRM学習ガイドの内容は、すべてのレベルの候補者にとって非常に簡単に理解できます。
CPHRM参考書勉強: https://www.it-passports.com/CPHRM.html