2026 Latest TrainingQuiz 312-97 PDF Dumps and 312-97 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ggLStZqPw5jr_ntK95UKzqE3i664jxJG
The EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) certification exam is one of the best credentials in the modern ECCouncil world. The EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) certification offers a unique opportunity for beginners or experienced professionals to demonstrate their expertise and knowledge with an industry-recognized certificate. With the ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Dumps, you can not only validate your skill set but also get solid proof of your proven expertise and knowledge.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Related Certifications: | CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) CND (Certified Network Defender) CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
Each format of the ECCouncil Certification Exams not only offers updated exam questions but also additional benefits. A free trial of the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam dumps prep material before purchasing, up to 1 year of free updates, and a money-back guarantee according to terms and conditions are benefits of buying EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) real questions today. A support team is also available 24/7 to answer any queries related to the ECCouncil 312-97 exam dumps.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 113
(Elizabeth Moss has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company located in San Diego, California. Due to the robust security and cost-effective service provided by AWS, her organization transferred all the workloads from on-prem to AWS cloud in 2017. Elizabeth would like to prevent committing AWS keys into repositories; therefore, she created a global git-templates directory using command line. Then, she created another directory, named it as hooks, wherein she created a file named pre- commit. In the pre-commit file, Elizabeth pasted the script that would prevent committing AWS keys into the repositories. She would like to ensure that the hook is executable. Which of the following command should Elizabeth run to make sure that the pre-commit hook is executable?)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Git hooks must have executable permissions to run automatically during Git operations such as commits. The standard way to make a file executable on Unix-like systems is by using the chmod command with the +x flag. In Elizabeth's setup, the pre-commit hook is located in the ~/.git-templates/hooks/ directory, so the correct command is chmod a+x ~/.git-templates/hooks/pre-commit. The a+x option grants execute permission to all users, ensuring that the hook runs regardless of the user context. Options using +e are invalid because e is not a recognized permission flag. Ensuring that the hook is executable during the Code stage helps prevent accidental exposure of AWS credentials by enforcing security checks before commits are finalized.
NEW QUESTION # 114
Ethan Roberts has been working as a backend developer in a fintech company. His team has built a Python-based web application. During a routine code review, Ethan noticed that some third-party dependencies in the application might have security vulnerabilities. To address this, he consulted Sophia Bennett, a DevSecOps specialist, to identify the insecure dependencies. Sophia utilized an SCA tool to scan for known vulnerabilities in Python libraries and successfully detected all the insecure dependencies.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Bandit is the Python security tool from the options: it scans Python code/dependencies for security issues and was used to identify insecure third-party libraries. Bundler-Audit targets Ruby gems, Retire.js targets JavaScript libraries, and Tenable.io is infrastructure vulnerability management-none fit Python dependency scanning.
NEW QUESTION # 115
Sophia, a DevSecOps engineer, is working on improving the security posture of her organization's cloud-native applications. She wants to integrate continuous threat modeling directly into the software development process to ensure that developers can identify security risks while writing code. To achieve this, she introduces a tool that allows developers to annotate source code with security concerns, generate data flow diagrams (DFDs), and create threat model reports dynamically. This approach enables real-time visibility into security risks and bridges the gap between development and security teams. Which tool should Sophia use to achieve this?
Answer: A
Explanation:
ThreatSpec lets developers annotate source code with security concerns (threats, mitigations, transfers) inline as comments, then generates data-flow diagrams and threat model reports dynamically-embedding continuous threat modeling directly into the development workflow, exactly as Sophia needs. Threagile models from YAML files, Bandit is a Python SAST tool, and Jira is issue tracking.
NEW QUESTION # 116
Aditi Sharma, a DevSecOps engineer at a Pune SaaS company, wants to define security policies as code - such as "no container may run with privileged: true" - that are automatically enforced by the Kubernetes API server before any non-compliant resource is admitted to the cluster. Which technology should Aditi use?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Open Policy Agent, typically deployed as Gatekeeper in Kubernetes, allows security and platform teams to define declarative "policy as code" rules -- such as disallowing privileged containers -- that are enforced by a validating admission webhook, automatically rejecting any resource creation request that violates policy before it is ever admitted to the cluster, exactly matching Aditi's requirement. Prometheus alerting rules generate notifications based on collected metrics crossing defined thresholds but do not proactively block non-compliant resources from being created. Grafana dashboards visualize metrics data for human review and have no enforcement capability whatsoever. A Jenkins build agent executes CI/CD pipeline jobs and is unrelated to Kubernetes admission-time policy enforcement. Since Aditi needs automated, pre-admission policy enforcement in Kubernetes, OPA/Gatekeeper is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 117
Mateus Rocha, a DevSecOps engineer at a Sao Paulo digital bank, wants to ensure that even if an attacker compromises one microservice's container, they cannot easily pivot to access other services' pods or the underlying Kubernetes API server. Which Kubernetes control most directly limits this lateral movement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Kubernetes NetworkPolicies define explicit rules governing which pods can communicate with which other pods, namespaces, or external endpoints (including the Kubernetes API server), allowing Mateus to enforce a default-deny posture that restricts lateral movement so that a compromised container cannot freely reach other services or sensitive control-plane endpoints.
Increasing the number of replicas affects availability and load distribution, not network-level segmentation or lateral movement prevention. The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler automatically scales replica counts based on resource metrics and has no security segmentation function.
Enabling verbose application logging may aid post-incident forensic investigation but does not actively prevent or limit an attacker's lateral movement in real time. Because Mateus needs to directly restrict pod-to-pod and pod-to-API-server communication, a NetworkPolicy is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 118
......
312-97 Valid Exam Test: https://www.trainingquiz.com/312-97-practice-quiz.html
2026 Latest TrainingQuiz 312-97 PDF Dumps and 312-97 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ggLStZqPw5jr_ntK95UKzqE3i664jxJG