DOWNLOAD the newest Real4dumps SD-WAN-Engineer PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16fEI2eVJpDrdqjRVs1fO2PkUMmFEopMP
Our latest SD-WAN-Engineer exam dump is comprehensive, covering all the learning content you need to pass the qualifying exams. Users with qualifying exams can easily access our web site, get their favorite latest SD-WAN-Engineer study guide, and before downloading the data, users can also make a free demo for an accurate choice. Users can easily pass the exam by learning our SD-WAN-Engineer practice materials, and can learn some new knowledge, is the so-called live to learn old. Believe in yourself, choosing the SD-WAN-Engineer Study Guide is the wisest decision. So far, the SD-WAN-Engineer practice materials have almost covered all the official test of useful materials, before our products on the Internet, all the study materials are subject to rigorous expert review, so you do not have to worry about quality problems of our latest SD-WAN-Engineer exam dump, focus on the review pass the qualification exam. I believe that through these careful preparation, you will be able to pass the exam.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
>> Reliable SD-WAN-Engineer Braindumps <<
Pass rate is 98.45% for SD-WAN-Engineer learning materials, which helps us gain plenty of customers. You can pass the exam and obtain the certification successfully if you choose us. SD-WAN-Engineer exam braindumps contain both questions and answers, and it’s convenient for you to check the answers after practicing. You can try free demo before buying SD-WAN-Engineer Exam Materials, so that you can know what the complete version is like. We provide you with free update for 365 days after purchasing, and the update version for SD-WAN-Engineer exam dumps will be sent to you automatically. You just need to check your email and change your learning ways according to new changes.
NEW QUESTION # 49
When identifying devices for IoT classification purposes, which two methods does Prisma SD-WAN use to discover devices that are not directly connected to the branch ION? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
Prisma SD-WAN (formerly CloudGenix) integrates with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to provide comprehensive visibility into all devices at a branch, including those that are not directly connected to the ION device. While the ION automatically detects and classifies devices connected directly to its interfaces via traffic inspection (DPI), DHCP, and ARP analysis, gaining visibility into off-branch devices (devices connected to downstream switches or access points) requires additional discovery mechanisms that can query the network infrastructure or ingest its logs.
1. SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol): This is the primary active discovery method for off- branch devices. The Prisma SD-WAN ION device acts as a sensor that actively polls local network switches and wireless controllers using SNMP. By querying the ARP tables and MAC address tables (Bridge MIBs) of these intermediate network devices, the ION can identify endpoints that are connected to the switch ports, even if those endpoints are not currently sending traffic through the ION. This allows the system to map the topology and discover silent or lateral-traffic-only devices.
2. Syslog: In conjunction with SNMP, the IoT Security solution can utilize Syslog messages to discover and profile devices. Network infrastructure devices (like switches and WLAN controllers) can be configured to send Syslog messages to the collection point (which enables the IoT Security service) whenever a device connects or disconnects (e.g., port up/down events, DHCP snooping logs, or 802.1x authentication logs).
These logs provide real-time data about device presence and identity (MAC/IP mappings) for devices that are not directly adjacent to the ION, ensuring 100% visibility across the branch network segments. LLDP (A) and CDP (B) are typically Link Layer discovery protocols used for discovering directly connected neighbors and do not propagate beyond the immediate link, making them unsuitable for discovering devices multiple hops away or behind a switch.
NEW QUESTION # 50
There are periodic complaints about the poor performance of a real-time application.
What can be inferred about the performance issue, based on the Network Transfer Time (NTT) and Server Response Time (SRT) image below?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In Prisma SD-WAN, application performance is monitored through distinct metrics that separate network health from application health. The provided graph displays Network Transfer Time (NTT) in blue and Server Response Time (SRT) in orange. NTT measures the round-trip time of packets traversing the WAN fabric, while SRT measures the time elapsed from when the server receives a request to when it sends the first response packet.
Analysis of the telemetry data shows that the NTT (blue line) remains consistently low and stable, generally staying below 100 milliseconds throughout the capture period. This indicates that the SD-WAN path and underlying network circuits are not the source of the latency. Conversely, the SRT (orange line) exhibits significant and erratic spikes, reaching as high as 450 to 475 milliseconds. These spikes occur while the network latency (NTT) remains flat.
Because the latency increases are isolated to the SRT metric, the root cause is confirmed to be on the Application Server side. This pattern typically suggests that the server is struggling with resource exhaustion, high CPU utilization, or database query delays during peak processing times. For a real-time application, these SRT spikes translate directly to jitter and "lag" for the end-user. By distinguishing between these two metrics, Prisma SD-WAN allows network administrators to prove that the network is performing within SLA and shift the troubleshooting focus to the application or server management teams, significantly reducing mean time to innocence (MTTI).
NEW QUESTION # 51
When allocating Aggregate Bandwidth for a Prisma Access "Remote Network" deployment (connecting 50 branch sites), how is the bandwidth license enforced?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
Prisma Access manages Remote Network bandwidth using an Aggregate Bandwidth licensing model.
Compute Locations: When you purchase bandwidth (e.g., 1 Gbps), you allocate it to specific Prisma Access Compute Locations (e.g., US West, Europe Central).
Shared Pool: All branch sites (Remote Networks) that connect to that specific Compute Location share the allocated bandwidth pool. For example, if you allocate 500 Mbps to "US West" and connect 10 branches to it, they compete for that 500 Mbps aggregate.
Bursting: An individual branch is not strictly rate-limited to a "slice" (e.g., 50 Mbps) unless you explicitly configure QoS guarantees. By default, a single branch can burst and consume a large portion of the aggregate pool if other branches are idle. The enforcement happens at the Region/Compute Node level, ensuring the total throughput does not exceed the licensed capacity for that region.
NEW QUESTION # 52
When an ION device has been claimed, the cloud-based controller generates and communicates with the device by which method?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In the Prisma SD-WAN (formerly CloudGenix) architecture, the security and authenticity of device-to- controller communication are paramount. When a new ION (Instant-On Network) device is powered on and connected to the internet, it initiates a secure "phone home" process to the Prisma SD-WAN Cloud Controller.
To ensure that the controller is communicating with a genuine Palo Alto Networks hardware or software instance, the system utilizes a Manufacturer Installed Certificate (MIC).
The MIC is a unique digital certificate burned into the hardware's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) or secure storage during the manufacturing process. This certificate acts as the device's foundational identity. When a customer "claims" a device in the Prisma SD-WAN portal using its serial number, the controller maps that serial number to the specific MIC associated with that unit.
Once the device is claimed and attempts to connect, a mutual TLS (mTLS) handshake occurs. The ION device presents its MIC to the controller to prove its identity, and the controller validates this against its records. This method eliminates the need for manual staging, pre-configuration, or the complexity of managing a Customer Installed Certificate (CIC) or a private Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) during the initial deployment phase. By leveraging the MIC, Prisma SD-WAN achieves true Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP), ensuring that only authorized, authentic devices can join the fabric and receive configuration policies, thereby maintaining a secure and automated onboarding workflow.
NEW QUESTION # 53
A network engineer is able to ping and traceroute from SD-WAN branch IP 192.168.1.123 to servers in primary data center - DC1, but is unable to ping or traceroute to a server 10.2.2.22 in the newly configured secondary data center, DC2.
The DC2 ION device is advertising the branch IP subnet 192.168.1.0/24 to the DC2 core via eBGP Core Peer.
The DC2 data center site has site prefix 10.2.2.0/23 configured.
Which configuration will resolve the issue in this scenario?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, the routing of traffic between branches and Data Centers (DCs) relies on the proper synchronization between the AppFabric (the overlay) and the local routing protocols (the underlay
/LAN side). In this scenario, the branch can successfully reach DC1, indicating the branch ION is correctly participating in the fabric. However, traffic to DC2 (10.2.2.22) is failing.
The DC2 site has the site prefix 10.2.2.0/23 configured. In Prisma SD-WAN, defining a site prefix informs the Controller that this specific subnet "belongs" to that site, causing the Controller to advertise reachability for this prefix to all other ION devices in the fabric. Consequently, when the branch ION (192.168.1.123) attempts to reach 10.2.2.22, it correctly identifies DC2 as the destination and encapsulates the traffic toward the DC2 ION.
The bottleneck occurs once the packet arrives at the DC2 ION. While the ION is advertising the branch subnet (192.168.1.0/24) to the DC Core (ensuring the return path), the ION itself must know how to forward the incoming traffic from the branch to the internal DC network. If the DC2 ION does not have a specific route in its local routing table for the 10.2.2.0/23 subnet pointing to the DC Core's internal interface, the packet will be dropped.
According to Palo Alto Networks best practices for Data Center ION deployment, a static default route (0.0.0.0/0) should be configured on the ION device pointing toward the DC Core's next-hop IP address. This ensures that any traffic received from the AppFabric destined for internal DC resources-which are not directly connected to the ION-is successfully handed off to the core switching fabric for final delivery.
Adding this default route (Option A) resolves the reachability issue by providing the "last-hop" routing instruction within the DC.
NEW QUESTION # 54
......
In today’s society, there are increasingly thousands of people put a priority to acquire certificates to enhance their abilities. With a total new perspective, our SD-WAN-Engineer study materials have been designed to serve most of the office workers who aim at getting the SD-WAN-Engineer exam certification. Moreover, our SD-WAN-Engineer Exam Questions have been expanded capabilities through partnership with a network of reliable local companies in distribution, software and product referencing for a better development. We are helping you pass the SD-WAN-Engineer exam successfully has been given priority to our agenda.
SD-WAN-Engineer Valid Test Registration: https://www.real4dumps.com/SD-WAN-Engineer_examcollection.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Real4dumps SD-WAN-Engineer dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16fEI2eVJpDrdqjRVs1fO2PkUMmFEopMP