What's more, part of that Real4exams 312-97 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GcHVvaf-YleiuugiNSMJuY8jWQFDtJ07
Our 312-97 guide questions boost many advantages and varied functions. You can have a free download and tryout of our product before the purchase and our purchase procedures are safe. Our software carries no viruses and we provide 3 versions for you to choose. You need little time to learn the 312-97 Exam Torrent and prepare the exam. Our passing rate and the hit rate is very high. After you pass the exam you will gain a lot of benefits such as enter in the big company and double your wage.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Related Certifications: | CND (Certified Network Defender) CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Scenario-based Questions |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
>> New ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Preparation <<
Real4exams resolves your issue and provides you with an updated and actual ECCouncil 312-97 Practice Test. You can successfully prepare for the 312-97 exam in a short time with the help of our latest exam questions. Our 312-97 Questions are original and help you concentrate on the key domains of the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) certification exam. Therefore, you can save time and ace the test by practicing with these updated 312-97 exam questions.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 102
Isabela Marques, a DevSecOps engineer at a Porto software consultancy, wants developers to receive immediate feedback about newly introduced vulnerabilities directly within their pull request, before a reviewer even looks at the code, rather than waiting for a separate nightly scan report. What practice best achieves this?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Integrating SAST and SCA tools directly into the pull request CI workflow allows automated scans to run as soon as a PR is opened or updated, posting results and annotations inline before a human reviewer even examines the code, which provides the fast, "shift-left" feedback loop Isabela wants. Scheduling a weekly manual penetration test provides feedback far too infrequently and too late relative to individual pull requests. Waiting for production incident reports is entirely reactive and represents the latest, most costly point at which to discover a vulnerability.
Running scans only after each quarterly release delays feedback by months, defeating the purpose of continuous, rapid developer feedback. Since Isabela wants immediate, PR-level automated vulnerability feedback, integrating SAST/SCA into the PR CI workflow is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 103
As a DevOps Engineer at a large enterprise software company, you are investigating a critical issue where multiple developers are reporting frequent code conflicts and failed integrations in the development pipeline. Upon further analysis, you discover that some teams are overwriting each other's changes, and there is no proper versioning system in place to track modifications. Developers are struggling to roll back to previous versions of the code when bugs are introduced, causing significant delays in the release cycle. To resolve this issue, you decide to implement a version control solution that allows developers to securely push, track, and manage code changes while supporting both distributed and centralized version control models. Which Azure DevOps service should you implement?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Repos provides Git-based version control in Azure DevOps (supporting distributed Git workflows and centralized TFVC), letting developers securely push, track, and manage changes, and roll back to prior versions-solving the code-conflict and versioning problems. Azure Pipelines builds/deploys, Boards tracks work, and Artifacts manages packages.
NEW QUESTION # 104
Robert Wheeler has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company for the past 5 years. His organization develops software products and web applications related to AutoCAD.
Rob would like to integrate Rapid7 tCell Next-Gen Cloud WAF and RASP Tool with AWS CloudFront to protect application by identifying suspicious actors, enforcing content security policies (CSPs), and securing against unvalidated HTTP redirections on web applications. How can Rob deploy the tCell agent as a CloudFormation stack into his organization AWS account?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When integrating security controls at the CDN edge with AWS CloudFront, the typical deployment model uses Lambda@Edge, which allows code to execute at CloudFront edge locations on viewer request/response or origin request/response events. Deploying the tCell agent "as a CloudFormation stack" describes packaging the required AWS resources (IAM roles, functions, permissions, and CloudFront associations) into infrastructure-as-code, but the actual attachment point for CloudFront request/response processing is Lambda@Edge. Option C correctly reflects this: "plugging into CloudFront through Lambda@Edge." Standard Lambda functions run in regional AWS environments and cannot directly run at CloudFront edge locations in the same way; therefore, "CloudFront through Lambda Function" is not the best match for edge enforcement needs like CSP handling and redirect protections. Options that claim "plugging into CloudFormation" misunderstand CloudFormation's role: it deploys resources, but it is not the runtime integration point. Hence, CloudFront + Lambda@Edge is the correct deployment approach.
NEW QUESTION # 105
A DevOps team is integrating Splunk with GitLab to monitor their CI/CD pipeline and build status. They have followed the integration steps, including installing the GitLab Add-on from Splunkbase, configuring a GitLab account with the URL and a Personal Access Token in Splunk, setting environment variables for the Splunk HTTP Event Collector (HEC) endpoint and token , and using curl commands in their GitLab pipeline to send data to Splunk. Despite completing the integration, they notice that some pipeline logs are missing in Splunk, while others appear correctly. Upon further investigation, they suspect the issue is related to data formatting and log handling in Splunk. What should the team check to resolve this issue?
Answer: D
Explanation:
When some logs arrive but others are missing or malformed, the issue is typically in sourcetype parsing: updating the gitlab_json source type settings to properly handle JSON and increasing TRUNCATE values prevents long events from being cut off, resolving the missing/mangled pipeline logs. Reinstalling the add-on or manual uploads don't address parsing, and token privileges don't affect event truncation.
NEW QUESTION # 106
A gaming startup implemented an SCA tool in its CI/CD pipeline to enhance security during the build phase. While the tool successfully identified vulnerabilities in dependencies, the security team struggled to assess the actual risk posed by these findings. Without insight into how the detected vulnerabilities impacted the application's runtime behavior, prioritization became difficult, leading to inefficiencies in remediation efforts. What is the primary issue the team is facing?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The core problem is lack of context: SCA listed vulnerable dependencies, but without runtime/application context (whether the vulnerable code path is reachable or exploitable), the team couldn't assess real risk or prioritize remediation. The findings existed (so automation and the database worked), and version control is irrelevant.
NEW QUESTION # 107
......
312-97 Passing Score Feedback: https://www.real4exams.com/312-97_braindumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Real4exams 312-97 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GcHVvaf-YleiuugiNSMJuY8jWQFDtJ07