P.S. Free & New 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Actual4Cert: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uZdao0rIgSGFEa98fxAoV08Yc9w2yAi1
Some customers might worry that passing the exam is a time-consuming process. Now our 312-97 actual test guide can make you the whole relax down, with all the troubles left behind. Involving all types of questions in accordance with the real exam content, our 312-97 exam questions are compiled to meet all of your requirements. The comprehensive coverage would be beneficial for you to pass the exam. Only need to spend about 20-30 hours practicing our 312-97 study files can you be fully prepared for the exam. With deeply understand of core knowledge 312-97 actual test guide, you can overcome all the difficulties in the way. So our 312-97 exam questions would be an advisable choice for you.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Price: | $250 (USD) |
| Related Certifications: | CND (Certified Network Defender) CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based Questions, Multiple Choice |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde |
Free domo will be provided for 312-97 study materials, and you can know deeper what you will buy. We offer you free update for 365 days after you purchasing. And the latest version will be sent to your email address automatically. Therefore you can get the latest information of the 312-97 Exam Dumps. Besides, we have the technicians to examine the website at times, and it will provide you with a clean and safe shopping environment. You just need to buy 312-97 study materials with ease.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 100
(Charles Drew has been working as a DevSecOps team leader in an IT company located in Nashville, Tennessee. He would like to look at the applications from an attacker's perspective and make security a part of the organizations' culture. Imagine, you are working under Charles as a DevSecOps engineer. Charles has asked you to install ThreatPlaybook, which is a unified DevSecOps Framework that allows you to go from iterative, collaborative threat modeling to application security testing orchestration. After installation, you must configure ThreatPlaybook CLI; therefore, you have created a directory for the project and then you go to the current directory where you would like to configure ThreatPlaybook. Which of the following commands will you use to configure ThreatPlaybook? (Here, < your-email > represents your email id; < host info > represents IP address; and < port > represents the nginx port.))
Answer: D
Explanation:
ThreatPlaybook CLI is configured using the ThreatPlaybook configure command, which initializes the CLI with the required connection and user details. The -e option is used to specify the user's email address, the -h option defines the host information such as IP address or hostname, and the -p option specifies the port number. This configuration enables the CLI to securely communicate with the ThreatPlaybook service for orchestrating threat modeling and application security testing workflows. Options that use playbook configure are incorrect because the executable name is explicitly ThreatPlaybook. Options using -u instead of -h do not correctly specify host information. Configuring ThreatPlaybook during the Plan stage helps teams adopt an attacker's mindset early, embedding security into the organization's culture and ensuring threats are identified and addressed before development and deployment activities begin.
========
NEW QUESTION # 101
(Thomas Gibson has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and web applications related to law enforcement. To automatically execute a scan against the web apps, he would like to integrate InsightAppSec plugin with Jenkins. Therefore, Thomas generated a new API Key in the Insight platform. Now, he wants to install the plugin manually. How can Thomas install the InsightAppSec plugin manually in Jenkins?)
Answer: D
Explanation:
Jenkins plugins are distributed and installed as .hpi files. To manually install a plugin, administrators upload the .hpi file through the Jenkins Plugin Manager using the "Upload Plugin" option. This approach is commonly used in environments with restricted internet access or when custom plugin versions are required. .
war files are used for deploying the Jenkins application itself, not plugins, while .zip and .conf files are not recognized plugin formats. Installing the InsightAppSec plugin allows Jenkins pipelines to automatically trigger dynamic application security scans during the Build and Test stage. This integration ensures that web applications are continuously evaluated for vulnerabilities before deployment, supporting proactive security testing and risk reduction.
========
NEW QUESTION # 102
A DevSecOps team is working on an Azure DevOps project and wants to enhance security by configuring GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS). One of their primary concerns is the accidental exposure of sensitive information-such as API keys, credentials, and other confidential data-when developers push code to the repository. To mitigate this risk, the team is looking for a solution that can automatically detect and block sensitive information before it gets committed, ensuring that such data never reaches the repository. Which GHAS feature should the team enable to achieve this level of protection?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Secret Scanning Push Protection in GitHub Advanced Security scans pushes for secrets (API keys, credentials) and blocks the push before sensitive data ever reaches the repository-precisely the preventive control the team wants. Code scanning and dependency scanning analyze code and dependencies after push, and repository onboarding is a setup process, not a protection feature.
NEW QUESTION # 103
(Jordon Garrett has recently joined a startup IT company located in Chicago, Illinois, as a DevSecOps engineer. His team leader asked him to find a SAST tool that can secure the organization Azure environment.
Which of the following is a SAST tool that Jordon can select to secure his organization's Azure environment?.)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Coverity is a well-known Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool used to analyze source code for security vulnerabilities, coding errors, and quality issues. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports enterprise-scale environments, including cloud-based development on platforms such as Azure. Accurics focuses on Infrastructure as Code security, Tenable.io is a vulnerability management platform for infrastructure and assets, and DevSkim is a lightweight code scanning extension rather than a full SAST platform. Selecting Coverity enables deep static analysis of application code during the Code stage, helping teams detect vulnerabilities early and reduce remediation costs.
========
NEW QUESTION # 104
Sara Lindqvist, a DevSecOps engineer at a Helsinki healthtech company, must ensure that patient data used in the staging environment for testing does not expose real patient identities, while still preserving realistic data formats and referential integrity for QA testing. Which technique should Sara apply?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Data masking (or anonymization/pseudonymization) techniques replace or obscure sensitive fields such as names, national ID numbers, or medical record identifiers with realistic but non- identifying substitute values, while preserving data format, structure, and referential integrity needed for effective QA testing -- exactly satisfying Sara's dual requirement of privacy protection and testing realism. Fully replicating production data with no changes would expose real patient identities in a lower-security environment, violating privacy regulations like HIPAA or GDPR.
Disabling the staging environment entirely would prevent QA testing altogether, which is not a viable solution to the data privacy problem. Encrypting the entire database with a single shared key visible to all developers does not actually anonymize the data -- anyone with that key could still view real patient identities, and broad key visibility itself creates a serious exposure risk.
Since Sara needs privacy-preserving yet realistic test data, data masking/anonymization is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 105
......
312-97 Reliable Test Testking: https://www.actual4cert.com/312-97-real-questions.html
P.S. Free 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Actual4Cert: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uZdao0rIgSGFEa98fxAoV08Yc9w2yAi1