Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Real Exam & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide

P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PracticeMaterial: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zQ_d-GbdxAFDuLzQlKkxXDHdPVrZFDF-

At PracticeMaterial, we strive hard to offer a comprehensive PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam questions preparation material bundle pack. The product available at PracticeMaterial includes PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps pdf and mock tests (desktop and web-based). Practice exams give an experience of taking the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) actual exam.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionObjectives
Topic 1: Conducting an Audit- Audit execution
  • 1. Nonconformity identification
    • 2. Interviewing techniques
      • 3. Evidence collection and verification
        Topic 2: Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001- ISO/IEC 27001 requirements (Clauses 4–10)
        • 1. Planning and risk management
          • 2. Context of the organization
            • 3. Leadership and commitment
              • 4. Performance evaluation
                • 5. Support and resources
                  • 6. Operation and controls
                    • 7. Improvement and corrective actions
                      Topic 3: Closing the Audit- Audit reporting and follow-up
                      • 1. Corrective action review
                        • 2. Audit report preparation
                          Topic 4: Fundamentals of Information Security Auditing- Audit principles based on ISO 19011
                          • 1. Integrity, fair presentation, due professional care
                            • 2. Confidentiality and independence
                              Topic 5: Planning and Initiating an Audit- Audit program and planning activities
                              • 1. Audit team selection
                                • 2. Defining audit objectives, scope, and criteria

                                  >> Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Real Exam <<

                                  New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide - New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Practice

                                  Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam torrent is available in PDF, software, and online three modes, which allowing you to switch learning materials on paper, on your phone or on your computer, and to study anywhere and anytime with the according version of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice test. Before you purchase the system, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test provides you with a free trial service, so that customers can fully understand our system before buying; after the online payment is successful, you can receive mail from customer service in 5 to 10 minutes, and then immediately begin to learn ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training prep.

                                  PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q112-Q117):

                                  NEW QUESTION # 112
                                  After completing Stage 1 and in preparation for a Stage 2 initial certification audit, the auditee informs the audit team leader that they wish to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites that have recently been acquired by the organisation.
                                  Considering this information, what action would you expect the audit team leader to take?

                                  Answer: C

                                  Explanation:
                                  According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, the audit team leader should obtain information about the additional sites to inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme, as this may affect the audit objectives, scope, criteria, duration, resources, and risks. The audit team leader should also review the audit plan and make any necessary adjustments in consultation with the auditee and the audit client1. Reference: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 27, section 4.3.2.2.


                                  NEW QUESTION # 113
                                  Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.
                                  Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic's security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments.
                                  Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.
                                  During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC
                                  27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.
                                  Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
                                  Question:
                                  According to Scenario 9, the auditor decided to conduct the extension audit during the surveillance audit.
                                  How do you define this situation?

                                  Answer: C

                                  Explanation:
                                  Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
                                  * A. Correct Answer:
                                  * ISO/IEC 17021-1 allows extension audits to be conducted alongside surveillance audits.
                                  * This reduces redundancy and cost while maintaining compliance.
                                  * B. Incorrect:
                                  * Certification bodies have the authority to approve extension audits.
                                  * C. Incorrect:
                                  * Extensions are not restricted to the second year-they can occur at any time during the certification cycle.
                                  Relevant Standard Reference:
                                  * ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.5 (Extension Audits During Surveillance)


                                  NEW QUESTION # 114
                                  What is the worst possible action that an employee may receive for sharing his or her password or access with others?

                                  Answer: B

                                  Explanation:
                                  The worst possible action that an employee may receive for sharing his or her password or access with others is termination, because this is a serious breach of the organization's information security policy and access control policy. Sharing password or access with others may allow unauthorized users to access sensitive or confidential information, or to perform malicious or fraudulent activities on behalf of the employee. The employee should keep his or her password or access confidential and secure, and should not disclose it to anyone under any circumstances. Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements], Example of an information security policy, Example of an access control policy


                                  NEW QUESTION # 115
                                  -------------------------is an asset like other important business assets has value to an organization and consequently needs to be protected.

                                  Answer: B

                                  Explanation:
                                  Explanation
                                  Information is an asset like other important business assets, as it has value to an organization and consequently needs to be protected. Information can be in any form, such as electronic, paper, or verbal. Information security is the protection of information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) | CQI | IRCA


                                  NEW QUESTION # 116
                                  You are carrying out your first third-party ISMS surveillance audit as an Audit Team Leader. You are presently in the auditee's data centre with another member of your audit team.
                                  You are currently in a large room that is subdivided into several smaller rooms, each of which has a numeric combination lock and swipe card reader on the door. You notice two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorised electrical repairs.
                                  You go to reception and ask to see the door access record for the client's suite. This indicates only one card was swiped. You ask the receptionist and they reply, "yes it's a common problem. We ask everyone to swipe their cards but with contractors especially, one tends to swipe and the rest simply 'tailgate' their way in" but we know who they are from the reception sign-in.
                                  Based on the scenario above which one of the following actions would you now take?

                                  Answer: H

                                  Explanation:
                                  According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control A.7.2 requires an organization to implement appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas1. The organization should define and document the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, and should monitor and record the use of such access rights1. Therefore, when auditing the organization's application of control A.7.2, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
                                  Based on the scenario above, the auditor should raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2, as the secure area is not adequately protected from unauthorized access. The auditor should provide the following evidence and justification for the nonconformity:
                                  * Evidence: The auditor observed two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorized electrical repairs. The auditor checked the door access record for the client's suite and found that only one card was swiped. The auditor asked the receptionist and was told that it was a common problem that contractors tend to swipe one card and tailgate their way in, but they were known from the reception sign-in.
                                  * Justification: This evidence indicates that the organization has not implemented appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas, as required by control A.7.2. The organization has not defined and documented the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, as there is no verification or authorization process for providing swipe cards and combination numbers to external contractors. The organization has not monitored and recorded the use of access rights to secure areas, as there is no mechanism to ensure that each individual swipes their card and enters their combination number before entering a secure area. The organization has relied on the reception sign-in as a means of identification, which is not sufficient or reliable for ensuring information security.
                                  The other options are not valid actions for auditing control A.7.2, as they are not related to the control or its requirements, or they are not appropriate or effective for addressing the nonconformity. For example:
                                  * Take no action: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformity, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems.
                                  * Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not supplier relationships. Control A.5.20 requires an organization to agree on information security requirements with suppliers that may access, process, store, communicate or provide IT infrastructure components for its information assets1. While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security in supplier relationships, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
                                  * Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not working in secure areas. Control A:7.6 requires an organization to define and apply security measures for working in secure areas1.
                                  While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security when working in secure areas, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
                                  * Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather attempts to find alternative or compensating controls that may mitigate its impact or likelihood. While additional arrangements such as CCTV may be useful for verifying individual access to secure areas, they do not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
                                  * Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may prevent or reduce its recurrence or severity. While accompanying contractors at all times when accessing secure facilities may be a good practice for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
                                  * Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may increase awareness or compliance with the existing controls. While having a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times may be a helpful reminder for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
                                  * Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather instructs the organization to take a corrective action that may not be effective or sufficient for ensuring information security. While writing to contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately may be a communication measure for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.
                                  7.2.
                                  References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


                                  NEW QUESTION # 117
                                  ......

                                  The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor latest question from our company can help people get their ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification in a short time. If you want to get the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification to improve your life, we can tell you there is no better alternative than our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions. The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor test torrent also offer a variety of learning modes for users to choose from, which can be used for multiple clients of computers and mobile phones to study online, as well as to print and print data for offline consolidation. Our product is affordable and good, if you choose our products, we can promise that our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Torrent will not let you down.

                                  New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide: https://www.practicematerial.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam-materials.html

                                  BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PracticeMaterial ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zQ_d-GbdxAFDuLzQlKkxXDHdPVrZFDF-