P.S. Free 2026 National Payroll Institute PF1 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamTorrent: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m0VXk6UnrZwpnCcuOFvY1iyUqxb3Qe-c
Full refund is available if you fail to pass the exam in your first attempt after buying PF1 exam bootcamp from us, and we will refund your money, In addition, PF1 exam dumps contain both questions and answers, and it’s convenient for you to check the answers after practicing. PF1 exam botcamp cover most of the knowledge points of the exam, and you can master the major knowledge points as well as improve your professional ability in the process of training. We have online and offline chat service for PF1 Exam Dumps, and if you have any questions, you can consult us.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Earnings, Deductions, and Taxation | - Types of earnings
|
| Topic 2: Payroll Records and Compliance Reporting | - Government reporting
|
| Topic 3: Payroll Fundamentals and Compliance Framework | - Payroll system overview in Canada
|
If there is any issue while using our PF1 updated exam product, contact our customer support. We will resolve your issues related to the PF1 practice material as soon as possible. For quick and successful Payroll Fundamentals 1Exam test preparation, download PF1 Real Exam dumps today.
NEW QUESTION # 42
Feraz Dalia is due $12,523.00 in legislated wages in lieu of notice that will be added to his last weekly pay of
$1,080.00. Calculate Feraz's Employment Insurance (EI) premium, if his employer is situated in Saskatchewan and the yearly maximum contribution will not be exceeded.
Answer:
Explanation:
$221.73 (employee EI premium)
Explanation:
In Saskatchewan (outside Quebec), EI premiums are deducted at the 2026 employee EI premium rate of $1.63 per $100 of insurable earnings (1.63%).
CRA guidance confirms that wages in lieu of termination notice are subject to EI premiums, and to determine statutory deductions you include the wages in lieu with the regular income (if any) for the pay period.
Step 1: Determine total insurable earnings in the final pay (assuming both amounts are insurable and the annual maximum won't be exceeded):
$12,523.00 + $1,080.00 = $13,603.00.
Step 2: Calculate EI premium:
$13,603.00 × 1.63% = $13,603.00 × 0.0163 = $221.7289, which rounds to $221.73.
So, the EI premium to deduct from Feraz's pay for this combined payment is $221.73.
NEW QUESTION # 43
In Block 12 of the Record of Employment, the final pay period ending date for employees who are paid solely by commission or are paid salary plus irregularly paid commission will be:
Answer: A
Explanation:
Service Canada treats commission salespeople (paid solely by commission or salary plus irregularly paid commission) as a special ROE situation where the weekly averaging formula is used. In that scenario, the ROE Guide states that for Block 12 (Final pay period ending date) you must use the Saturday of the week that contains the last day for which paid (Block 11).
This is different from the usual rule for most employees, where Block 12 is simply the end date of the final pay period that includes the Block 11 date (and it can't be earlier than Block 11).
The key reason is consistency in applying the weekly averaging approach: even if the employer's actual payroll cycle is not weekly, commission-only/irregular-commission employees are reported using a weekly framework for ROE purposes. Payroll should therefore align Block 12 to the correct "weekly" period end (Saturday) when that rule applies, to avoid ROE errors and Service Canada follow-up.
NEW QUESTION # 44
The employee-employer relationship is deemed to be severed when:
Answer: D
Explanation:
In ROE administration, the key concept is whether the employment relationship is still "active" (that is, whether there is an ongoing expectation the employee will work again). Service Canada's ROE guidance ties ROE issuance to an interruption of earnings and specifically identifies situations where an employee is no longer on the employer's active employment list (for example, no expectation of future work) as a trigger for issuing an ROE.
Options A and B describe circumstances that can still align with an ongoing employment relationship. For example, employees may remain eligible for certain benefits after a last day worked, and a right to recall means the employer may still consider the employee attached to the workplace (often still "active" depending on the arrangement). In contrast, when there is no expectation of work to be performed, the relationship is effectively ended for ROE purposes, and the employer generally proceeds with separation reporting and ROE completion based on the interruption of earnings rules.
NEW QUESTION # 45
Rosa joined Avion Electronics in April 1983. Her employment was terminated on November 30, 2015 and she was paid a $62,500.00 retiring allowance. Rosa joined her company's pension plan in 1986 and was fully vested on termination of employment. Calculate the non-eligible portion of the retiring allowance.
Answer:
Explanation:
$32,000.00 non-eligible portion
Explanation:
CRA requires separating a retiring allowance into an eligible and non-eligible portion. The eligible portion is the maximum that can be transferred to an RRSP/RPP under the special rules (without using regular RRSP room). The formula is: $2,000 for each year (or part-year) of service before 1996, plus an additional $1,500 for each year (or part-year) before 1989 in which the employee had no employer pension/DPSP benefit vested at the time of payment (or previously paid).
Rosa worked from 1983 to 1995 (inclusive) for pre-1996 service: 13 years × $2,000 = $26,000.
For the extra pre-1989 amount: she joined the pension plan in 1986 and was fully vested when paid the retiring allowance in 2015, so 1986-1988 do not qualify for the extra $1,500. However, 1983-1985 were years before 1989 when she had no vested employer pension benefit, so 3 years × $1,500 = $4,500.
Eligible portion = $26,000 + $4,500 = $30,500.
Non-eligible portion = $62,500 # $30,500 = $32,000.
NEW QUESTION # 46
By the authority of which Act can the Canada Revenue Agency garnish the wages of an employee who has failed to pay Employment Insurance premiums, Canada Pension Plan contributions, or income tax deductions?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The CRA's wage garnishment tool is commonly issued as a Requirement to Pay (RTP) (and related instruments such as ERTP/DTP), which directs a third party (often the employer) to redirect amounts that would otherwise be paid to the employee, and send them to the government instead. CRA guidance explains that when an employee owes money, the CRA can send the employer a requirement to pay notice, and the employer must remit the amounts as instructed (or the employer can become liable).
The legal authority for the CRA to issue a Requirement to Pay is found in the Income Tax Act, including section 224, which sets out the mechanism and consequences for non-compliance.
In payroll operations, this is a communication-and-compliance issue: payroll must correctly interpret the notice, apply the withholding/remittance as directed, and communicate impacts to internal stakeholders (HR
/finance) and, where appropriate, the affected employee-while ensuring the remittance is made exactly as the CRA notice requires.
NEW QUESTION # 47
......
In order to cater to the different needs of people from different countries in the international market, we have prepared three kinds of versions of our PF1 learning questions in this website. And we can assure you that you will get the latest version of our PF1 Training Materials for free from our company in the whole year after payment on PF1 practice quiz. Last but not least, we will provide the most considerate after sale service for our customers on our PF1 exam dumps.
Valid Exam PF1 Registration: https://www.examtorrent.com/PF1-valid-vce-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New PF1 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamTorrent: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m0VXk6UnrZwpnCcuOFvY1iyUqxb3Qe-c