BONUS!!! 免費下載VCESoft ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考試題庫的完整版：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1p068wbyOwl-aNWT9o4ruLu2kS3z_HROH
如果您在使用我們的PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考古題失敗了，我們承諾給您全額退款，您需要的是像我們發送你失敗的ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考試成績單來申請退款就可以了。經過我們確認之后，就會處理您的請求，這樣客戶擁有足夠的保障放心購買我們的PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考古題。選擇我們的ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor題庫資料可以保證你可以在短時間內學習及加強IT專業方面的知識，所以信任VCESoft是您最佳的選擇！
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Planning and Initiating an Audit | - Audit program and planning activities
|
| Topic 2: Conducting an Audit | - Audit execution
|
| Topic 3: Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 | - ISO/IEC 27001 requirements (Clauses 4–10)
|
| Topic 4: Fundamentals of Information Security Auditing | - Audit principles based on ISO 19011
|
| Topic 5: Closing the Audit | - Audit reporting and follow-up
|
>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor測試題庫 <<
作為IT業界的頂級公司，PECB 通過其認證確定了產品專家的標準，可以說 PECB 在業界的聲望和 PECB 產品的市場佔有率提升了其認證工程師的含金量，一個 PECB 認證工程師獲取在優秀企業工作的機會比普通工程師大60％－80％，平均薪水高出30％-50％。世界500強企業中，有超過2/3的企業選擇了PECB電子商務軟體產品作為其核心的運用。因此，獲得ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 的證照，即使在強手林立的競爭環境中，你同樣能夠脫穎而出。
問題 #57
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home (ABC) that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify the information security of ABC's healthcare mobile app development, support, and lifecycle process. During the audit, you learned the organization outsourced the mobile app development to a professional software development company with CMMI Level 5, ITSM (ISO/IEC 20000-1), BCMS (ISO 22301) and ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) certified.
The IT Manager presented the software security management procedure and summarised the process as following:
The mobile app development shall adopt "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles, as a minimum. The following security functions for personal data protection shall be available:
Access control.
Personal data encryption, i.e., Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm, key lengths: 256 bits; and Personal data pseudonymization.
Vulnerability checked and no security backdoor
You sample the latest Mobile App Test report, details as follows:
You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorised to approve the test.
The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure.
The reason why the encryption and pseudonymisation functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.
You are preparing the audit findings. Select the correct option.
答案：B
解題說明：
The correct option is D. There is a nonconformity (NC). The Service Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30). The IT Manager should have approved the test results according to the software security management procedure, not the Service Manager. The Service Manager's decision to accept the failed security tests also violates the "security-by-design" and "security-by-default" principles that the organization adopted. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant. The organization and developer did perform acceptance tests, but they failed (B, C). The Service Manager's decision to continue the service does not justify the nonconformity (A). Reference: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Clause 8.1 \n2: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, Domain 5: Conducting an ISO/IEC 27001 audit
問題 #58
Match the correct responsibility with each participant of a second-party audit:
答案：
解題說明：
Explanation:
The correct responsibility with each participant of a second-party audit is:
* Prepares the audit report: Audit Team Leader. The audit team leader is responsible for coordinating the audit activities, communicating with the auditee and the customer, and preparing and delivering the audit report that summarizes the audit findings and conclusions1.
* Prepares audit checklists for use during the audit: Auditor. The auditor is responsible for collecting and verifying objective evidence during the audit, using audit checklists as a tool to guide the audit process and ensure that all relevant aspects of the audit criteria are covered1.
* Supports an auditor and provides feedback on their experience: Auditor in training. The auditor in training is a person who is learning how to perform audits under the supervision of an experienced auditor. The auditor in training supports the auditor by observing and participating in the audit activities, and provides feedback on their experience to improve their skills and competence1.
* Follows-up on audit findings within an agreed timeframe: Auditee. The auditee is the organisation that is being audited by the customer or a third party on behalf of the customer. The auditee is responsible for providing access and cooperation to the auditors, and for following up on the audit findings within an agreed timeframe, by implementing corrective actions or improvement measures as needed1.
* Provides an independent account of the audit but does not participate in the audit: Observer. The observer is a person who accompanies the audit team but does not participate in the audit activities. The observer may be a representative of the customer, a regulatory body, or another interested party. The observer provides an independent account of the audit but does not interfere with or influence the audit process or outcome1.
* Escorts the auditors but does not participate in the audit: Guide. The guide is a person who is appointed by the auditee to assist the audit team during the audit. The guide may escort the auditors to different locations, facilitate access to information and personnel, or provide clarification or explanation as requested by the auditors. The guide does not participate in the audit or influence its results1.
問題 #59
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:
Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.
答案：B
解題說明：
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
* Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
* Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
* Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC
17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
* Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
* Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
問題 #60
What type of measure involves the stopping of possible consequences of security incidents?
答案：A
解題說明：
A repressive measure is a type of measure that involves the stopping of possible consequences of security incidents. A security incident is an event that compromises the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets3. A repressive measure is a measure that aims to prevent or reduce the harm caused by a security incident after it has occurred. Examples of repressive measures include blocking malicious IP addresses, revoking user access rights, isolating infected systems, or restoring data from backups4. Repressive measures are different from preventive measures, which are measures that aim to avoid or reduce the likelihood of a security incident before it occurs. Examples of preventive measures include installing antivirus software, enforcing password policies, encrypting sensitive data, or conducting security awareness training4. Therefore, the correct answer is C. Reference: ISO/IEC 27000:2022, clause 3.25; Lepide.
問題 #61
Scenario 6: Cyber ACrypt is a cybersecurity company that provides endpoint protection by offering anti- malware and device security, asset life cycle management, and device encryption. To validate its ISMS against ISO/IEC 27001 and demonstrate its commitment to cybersecurity excellence, the company underwent a meticulous audit process led by John, the appointed audit team leader.
Upon accepting the audit mandate, John promptly organized a meeting to outline the audit plan and team roles This phase was crucial for aligning the team with the audit's objectives and scope However, the initial presentation to Cyber ACrypt's staff revealed a significant gap in understanding the audit's scope and objectives, indicating potential readiness challenges within the company As the stage 1 audit commenced, the team prepared for on-site activities. They reviewed Cyber ACrypt's documented information, including the information security policy and operational procedures ensuring each piece conformed to and was standardized in format with author identification, production date, version number, and approval date Additionally, the audit team ensured that each document contained the information required by the respective clause of the standard This phase revealed that a detailed audit of the documentation describing task execution was unnecessary, streamlining the process and focusing the team's efforts on critical areas During the phase of conducting on-site activities, the team evaluated management responsibility for the Cyber Acrypt's policies This thorough examination aimed to ascertain continual improvement and adherence to ISMS requirements Subsequently, in the document, the stage 1 audit outputs phase, the audit team meticulously documented their findings, underscoring their conclusions regarding the fulfillment of the stage 1 objectives. This documentation was vital for the audit team and Cyber ACrypt to understand the preliminary audit outcomes and areas requiring attention.
The audit team also decided to conduct interviews with key interested parties. This decision was motivated by the objective of collecting robust audit evidence to validate the management system's compliance with ISO
/IEC 27001 requirements. Engaging with interested parties across various levels of Cyber ACrypt provided the audit team with invaluable perspectives and an understanding of the ISMS's implementation and effectiveness.
The stage 1 audit report unveiled critical areas of concern. The Statement of Applicability (SoA) and the ISMS policy were found to be lacking in several respects, including insufficient risk assessment, inadequate access controls, and lack of regular policy reviews. This prompted Cyber ACrypt to take immediate action to address these shortcomings. Their prompt response and modifications to the strategic documents reflected a strong commitment to achieving compliance.
The technical expertise introduced to bridge the audit team's cybersecurity knowledge gap played a pivotal role in identifying shortcomings in the risk assessment methodology and reviewing network architecture. This included evaluating firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems, and other network security measures, as well as assessing how Cyber ACrypt detects, responds to, and recovers from external and internal threats. Under John's supervision, the technical expert communicated the audit findings to the representatives of Cyber ACrypt. However, the audit team observed that the expert s objectivity might have been compromised due to receiving consultancy fees from the auditee. Considering the behavior of the technical expert during the audit, the audit team leader decided to discuss this concern with the certification body.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 6, was the objective of the interviews during the Stage 1 audit accordingly set by the audit team?
答案：C
解題說明：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
* A. Correct Answer:
* The primary goal of audit interviews is to validate compliance with ISO/IEC 27001.
* ISO 19011:2018 states that interviews are a method to gather audit evidence.
* B. Incorrect:
* KPIs are relevant for performance measurement, but interviews focus on compliance validation.
* C. Incorrect:
* Understanding business challenges is secondary; the primary objective is ISO/IEC 27001 compliance verification.
Relevant Standard Reference:
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.6 (Interviewing Techniques in Auditing)
問題 #62
......
如果你購買了VCESoft的教材，那麼你就獲得了一年免費更新的服務。當考古題被更新時，VCESoft會馬上將最新版的資料發送到你的郵箱。你也可以隨時要求我們為你提供最新版的考古題。如果你想瞭解最新的考試試題，即使你已經成功通過ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考試，VCESoft也會為你免費更新ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor考試考古題。
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor最新題庫資源: https://www.vcesoft.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-pdf.html
從Google Drive中免費下載最新的VCESoft ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF版考試題庫：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1p068wbyOwl-aNWT9o4ruLu2kS3z_HROH