P.S.CertShikenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 ACDIS CCDS-Oダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LidrdrTSULgU7_t4hGc4J3uAyN7-SDvc
CertShikenのIT業界専門家チームは彼らの経験と知識を利用して絶えないな試験対策材料の品質を高めて、受験者の需要を満たして、受験者のはじめてACDIS CCDS-O試験を順調に合格するを保証します。あなた達はCertShikenの商品を購入してもっともはやく正確に試験に関する情報を手に入れます。CertShikenの商品は試験問題を広くカーバして、認証試験の受験生が便利を提供し、しかも正確率100%です。そして、試験を安心に参加してください。
| Certification Vendor: | ACDIS |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist-Outpatient (CCDS-O) Exam |
| Exam Number: | CCDS-O |
| Related Certifications: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist (CCDS) |
| Exam Format: | Remotely proctored or test center delivery, Computer-based, Multiple-choice questions |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Passing Score: | 85 out of 120 scored questions |
| Real Exam Qty: | 140 (120 scored, 20 unscored) |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Price: | $280 (ACDIS members), $380 (non-members), +$100 international fee |
| Recommended Training: | CCDS-O Exam Candidate Handbook CCDS-O Official Study Guide |
| Exam Registration: | Prometric Scheduling ACDIS Certification Application |
| Sample Questions: | ACDIS CCDS-O Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based testing at Prometric centers or remote proctoring via ProProctor |
| Pre Condition: | RN, MD, DO, or HIM/coding certification (RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CRC, COC) + 2 years outpatient CDI experience; OR 1 year outpatient + 1 year inpatient CDI experience; minimum 2,000 hours per year |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://acdis.org/certification/ccds-o |
この世界は毎日変わっています。世界の激しい変化によって、CCDS-O試験の内容も変わっています。でも、弊社のCCDS-O試験参考書は古くなることを心配する必要がないです。CCDS-O試験参考書は定期的に更新されますからです。そして、弊社は定期的にCCDS-O試験参考書を検査し、問題の答えの正確率を確保しています。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
質問 # 29
Which of the following are appropriate clinical indicators to support a query related to alcohol dependency in remission?
正解：D
解説：
To support a query for alcohol dependence in remission, outpatient CDI practice looks for indicators that reflect a documented history of dependence plus evidence the patient is actively maintaining sobriety or being followed for recovery status. Attendance at AA meetings together with a documented history of excessive alcohol use is a strong, direct indicator of recovery efforts and ongoing monitoring of a prior substance use disorder. This combination supports clarifying whether the provider intends to diagnose alcohol dependence in remission (versus current dependence, use without dependence, or no current disorder). By contrast, cirrhosis and elevated liver enzymes (option A) can be caused by many etiologies and do not, by themselves, establish dependence or remission status. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distention (option D) are nonspecific and may suggest acute illness or liver disease but are not specific to remission. Occasional social drinking with recreational drug use (option C) suggests current substance use and would not support "in remission" without additional documentation. Therefore, option B best supports a remission-related query.
質問 # 30
If a patient is being seen for follow-up and the documentation indicates that the patient was admitted to the hospital 28 days ago with an acute cerebral infarction with remaining right-sided weakness, which of the following diagnoses would be MOST appropriate?
正解：D
解説：
In the outpatient follow-up setting, when the acute stroke event has occurred in the recent past and the patient is now being evaluated for residual deficits, documentation and coding should focus on the sequelae (late effects) rather than re-coding the acute infarction itself-unless the provider clearly states the stroke is still in the acute phase and being actively treated as such. ACDIS outpatient CDI principles stress selecting the diagnosis that best reflects the reason for today's encounter and the condition being assessed/managed. Here, the ongoing clinical issue driving follow-up care is the persistent neurologic deficit (right-sided weakness/hemiparesis) after the cerebral infarction. Option C is the most specific and clinically accurate because it captures (1) the relationship to the prior cerebral infarction ("following cerebral infarction") and (2) laterality and dominance ("right dominant side"), which improves code specificity and reflects functional impact. Option A incorrectly keeps the focus on an unspecified cerebral infarction rather than the residual deficit, and option D is too nonspecific compared with a clearly described hemiparesis.
質問 # 31
The primary purpose of the RADV program is to
正解：D
解説：
RADV (Risk Adjustment Data Validation) is a CMS audit program used in Medicare Advantage to confirm that diagnoses submitted for risk adjustment are supported by medical record documentation and meet reporting requirements. Its central aim is payment integrity-ensuring that risk-adjusted capitation payments to Medicare Advantage organizations are accurate based on valid, documented conditions. In outpatient CDI practice, RADV risk underscores why documentation must clearly support each reported diagnosis (e.g., condition evaluated/assessed/treated, clinically relevant, and properly documented by an eligible provider), because unsupported diagnoses can lead to payment recoupment and compliance exposure. RADV is not designed to assess medical necessity of the services provided (that is typically addressed through utilization review and other payer audits), nor is it focused on identifying overpayments to individual physicians (it targets plan-level risk adjustment payments). It also is separate from E/M leveling accuracy, which is governed by CPT/E/M guidelines and distinct audit processes. Therefore, the best definition of RADV's primary purpose is ensuring the integrity and accuracy of risk-adjusted payments.
質問 # 32
HCC category assignment methodology is similar to which of the following?
正解：C
解説：
HCC category assignment is most similar to DRG diagnostic category logic because both methods take detailed diagnosis coding and map it into clinically meaningful groupings used for payment or performance methodologies. In CMS-HCC risk adjustment, ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes map to Condition Categories (HCCs) that represent disease groups with expected cost and complexity, and the model applies rules such as hierarchies (to avoid double-counting related conditions) and, in some cases, interactions (to recognize added impact when certain conditions coexist). DRGs similarly group diagnoses (and procedures in the inpatient setting) into a limited number of categories intended to reflect resource consumption and clinical similarity, rather than paying strictly on every individual code. By contrast, 835 is a remittance advice transaction standard (payment explanation) and has nothing to do with clinical grouping methodology. ICD-10-PCS and CPT are procedure/service coding systems; they describe interventions performed, not the risk-category grouping of diagnoses. Therefore, DRG diagnostic categories are the closest conceptual match to HCC assignment methodology.
質問 # 33
Which of the following coding guidelines is MOST important for a provider to understand when selecting diagnosis codes for an office visit as opposed to an inpatient stay?
正解：B
解説：
A core outpatient guideline difference is how to handle uncertainty in diagnoses. In the inpatient setting, facilities may code diagnoses documented as "probable," "suspected," "likely," or "rule out" at discharge if they meet inpatient reporting rules. In outpatient/office settings, however, uncertain conditions generally are not coded as established diagnoses because the encounter is often focused on evaluation rather than confirmed final diagnoses. Instead, outpatient coding relies on confirmed conditions and/or signs and symptoms when a definitive diagnosis has not been made. This is why outpatient CDI education emphasizes precise provider language: if the clinician is still evaluating, they should document the symptom/abnormal finding and the assessment plan; if the condition is confirmed, they should state it clearly and link it to evaluation/management performed. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because chronic conditions may need to be reported whenever they are assessed/managed, "first-listed" is an outpatient concept distinct from inpatient "principal," and documentation should support all clinically relevant conditions addressed, not only the chief complaint.
質問 # 34
......
CCDS-O試験番号: https://www.certshiken.com/CCDS-O-shiken.html
2026年CertShikenの最新CCDS-O PDFダンプおよびCCDS-O試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LidrdrTSULgU7_t4hGc4J3uAyN7-SDvc