What's more, part of that Prep4sureExam 156-590 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FMdveG2KW0Evz4iS9P3oTixa74IkM4G3
If you fail in the exam, we will refund you in full immediately at one time. After you buy our Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) exam torrent you have little possibility to fail in exam because our passing rate is very high. But if you are unfortunate to fail in the exam we will refund you immediately in full and the process is very simple. If only you provide the scanning copy of the 156-590 failure marks we will refund you immediately. If you have any doubts about the refund or there are any problems happening in the process of refund you can contact us by mails or contact our online customer service personnel and we will reply and solve your doubts or questions timely. We provide the best service and 156-590 Test Torrent to you to make you pass the exam fluently but if you fail in we will refund you in full and we won’t let your money and time be wasted.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Threat Prevention Overview and Architecture | 10% | - Threat Prevention architecture and components - Check Point Threat Prevention solution overview - Security Gateway integration with Threat Prevention |
| Threat Emulation (SandBlast) | 15% | - Threat Emulation policy configuration - Threat Emulation architecture and deployment - Zero-day threat protection - File emulation process and verdicts |
| Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus | 15% | - Configuring Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus policies - Bot detection mechanisms - Anti-Virus scanning methods (streamed vs. traditional) - Bot and malware signature updates |
| Threat Prevention Policy | 20% | - Threat Prevention action settings - Applying Threat Prevention policy layers - Profile-based vs. rule-based configurations - Creating and configuring Threat Prevention profiles |
| Threat Prevention Dashboard and Monitoring | 10% | - Using SmartConsole for monitoring - Threat Prevention statistics and trends - Threat Prevention logs and reporting - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues |
| IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) | 20% | - IPS policy configuration and tuning - IPS logging and alerts - IPS architecture and deployment modes - IPS signatures and protections - IPS exceptions and whitelisting |
| Threat Extraction | 10% | - Threat Extraction policy configuration - PDF, Office document, and archive sanitization - Threat Extraction (Sanboxing) concepts |
Our supporter of 156-590 study guide has exceeded tens of thousands around the world, which directly reflects the quality of them. Because the exam may put a heavy burden on your shoulder while our 156-590 practice materials can relieve you of those troubles with time passing by. Just spent some time regularly on our 156-590 Exam simulation, your possibility of getting it will be improved greatly. For your information, the passing rate of our 156-590 training engine is over 98% up to now.
NEW QUESTION # 20
Task: Configure exceptions for Anti-Virus to ignore a known safe file hash.
Answer:
Explanation:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Open SmartConsole > Threat Prevention > Protections.
2- Go to "Anti-Virus" protections.
3- Create a new exception using file hash under "Files & Hashes."
4- Set action to "Ignore" or "Detect."
5- Save, apply to profile, publish, and install policy.
NEW QUESTION # 21
Task: Troubleshoot policy installation failure.
Answer:
Explanation:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- In SmartConsole, attempt policy install again and note error.
2- View install_policy.elg in $FWDIR/log/.
3- Verify SIC is active.
4- Ensure policy contains no rulebase errors.
5- Re-push after resolving syntax or connectivity issues.
NEW QUESTION # 22
What happens to traffic that matches the Access Control Policy but not the Threat Prevention Policy?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. The traffic is not dropped. It is simply not inspected by the Threat Prevention Engine . Access Control and Threat Prevention are separate enforcement stages. The Access Control policy first decides whether the connection is allowed, rejected, or dropped. If Access Control accepts the connection, Threat Prevention is then applied only if the connection matches a Threat Prevention rule and therefore receives a Threat Prevention profile. Check Point documentation describes Threat Prevention policy as the mechanism used to activate only the protections needed and prevent attacks that most threaten the network. It also explains that Threat Prevention policy layers calculate their action separately and that in a single layer, the first matched rule is enforced.
Therefore, if accepted traffic does not match the Threat Prevention rulebase, no Threat Prevention profile is selected for that connection. The traffic is not blocked merely because of the non-match; it passes according to the Access Control decision, but without Threat Prevention inspection. Option A is too aggressive and incorrect. Option B incorrectly assumes logging. Option C is directionally true but incomplete because the key point is that Threat Prevention inspection is not applied. Reference topics: Access Control before Threat Prevention, Threat Prevention Rule Base, profile selection, unmatched traffic, ordered layer evaluation.
NEW QUESTION # 23
What are examples of evidence of compromises from inside network in conjunction with Bot-infected systems?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Users surfing the website directly by IP address or using domains registered within the last 30 days . Anti-Bot is focused on post-infection compromise evidence: it identifies hosts that may already be infected and attempts to prevent command-and-control communication or other botnet behavior. Check Point documentation describes Anti-Bot as a Threat Prevention component that blocks botnet behavior and communication to Command and Control centers, while the broader Threat Prevention solution provides multi-layered pre- and post-infection defense.
Direct IP browsing and use of newly registered domains are suspicious because malware frequently avoids mature domain reputation controls, rotates infrastructure quickly, or contacts IP-based C2 endpoints directly to bypass domain-based filtering. Domains registered within a recent window are a common risk indicator because malicious campaigns often use disposable infrastructure with short operational lifetimes. Option B is not inherently evidence of bot infection; explicit proxy use may be a network design choice. Option C describes normal intranet access patterns. Option D may indicate weak encryption hygiene but is not specific evidence of compromise. In Anti-Bot analysis, indicators such as suspicious destinations, direct IP access, newly observed domains, and C2-like behavior help identify infected internal hosts. Reference topics: Anti- Bot, post-infection detection, Command and Control communication, suspicious domains, infected-host analysis.
NEW QUESTION # 24
What is the name of the default Threat Prevention Profile?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Optimized . In Check Point Threat Prevention, profiles define how the gateway applies protections across blades such as IPS, Anti-Bot, Anti-Virus, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction.
The default profile is Optimized , because it balances effective security with acceptable gateway performance. Check Point documentation states that the Optimized profile is activated by default and that it gives excellent security with good gateway performance.
This design reflects the practical tradeoff in enterprise Threat Prevention: not every protection should be enabled at the most aggressive setting on every gateway, because high-impact protections can increase CPU consumption, latency, and inspection overhead. The Optimized profile uses criteria such as protection severity, confidence, and performance impact to activate protections that are broadly useful without creating unnecessary operational cost. Basic is less aggressive and is intended for lower-impact protection coverage.
Strict provides wider coverage but can affect performance more significantly. Standard is not one of the default Threat Prevention profiles in this context. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Profiles, default profile behavior, Optimized Protection Profile settings, blade activation, security/performance balance.
NEW QUESTION # 25
......
The receptiveness of three novel relationships for CheckPoint 156-590 exam licenses clients to rehearse themselves in various conditions. Free demos are accessible for download to look at in work areas for Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) (156-590) Exam. CheckPoint 156-590 Dumps awards you the whole day, constant client affiliation, and 365 days of free updates.
156-590 Test Fee: https://www.prep4sureexam.com/156-590-dumps-torrent.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Prep4sureExam 156-590 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FMdveG2KW0Evz4iS9P3oTixa74IkM4G3