さらに、Jpexam NP-Con-102ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-6f3mDWChFQC9DfK15LpqpOEGextP8cC
まだどうのようにSalesforce NP-Con-102資格認定試験にパースすると煩悩していますか。現時点で我々サイトJpexamを通して、ようやくこの問題を心配することがありませんよ。Jpexamは数年にわたりSalesforce NP-Con-102資格認定試験の研究に取り組んで、量豊かな問題庫があるし、豊富な経験を持ってあなたが認定試験に効率的に合格するのを助けます。NP-Con-102資格認定試験に合格できるかどうかには、重要なのは正確の方法で、復習教材の量ではありません。だから、JpexamはあなたがSalesforce NP-Con-102資格認定試験にパースする正確の方法です。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Fundraising and Engagement | - Donor Management
|
| Reporting, Analytics, and Integration | - Reporting and Dashboards
|
| Program and Service Management | - Program Lifecycle Management
|
| Case Management and Service Delivery | - Service and Case Tracking
|
| Nonprofit Cloud Fundamentals | - Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud Data Model
|
>> Salesforce NP-Con-102受験料過去問 <<
すべての顧客のニーズを満たすために、当社はこの分野で多くの主要な専門家と教授を採用しました。これらの専門家と教授は、お客様向けに高品質のNP-Con-102試験問題を設計しました。当社の製品がすべての人々に適していると約束できます。 NP-Con-102実践教材を購入して真剣に検討する限り、短時間で試験に合格して認定を取得することをお約束します。 NP-Con-102試験の質問を選択してレビューに役立ててください。NP-Con-102スタディガイドから多くのメリットを得ることができます。
質問 # 61
A board member introduced a high-net-worth individual to the work of the nonprofit. The individual made a donation at an event. The fundraising manager wants to record this information in Salesforce. It is important the donation is hard credited to the individual while ensuring this donation, as well as any future donations from the individual, are soft-credited to the board member. The board member and the individual already exist as contacts in Salesforce. How should the data be entered?
正解：C
解説：
This requirement involves two parts: a one-time transaction and an automated long-term "influence" tracking.
In NPSP, this is best accomplished by using the Relationship object's advanced soft-credit capabilities.
Step-by-Step Implementation:
* Define the Automated Soft Credit: The consultant should create a Relationship record between the Board Member and the Donor.
* Set the Related Opportunity Contact Role: On this Relationship record, there is a field called Related Opportunity Contact Role. The consultant should select Soft Credit (or a custom role like
"Solicitor").
* The Automation Logic: By setting this field on the relationship, NPSP's trigger framework is instructed that every time a donation is created where the donor is the "Primary Contact," the person on the other end of the relationship should automatically be added to that donation as an Opportunity Contact Role with the specified soft 3credit role.45
* Result: When the fundraiser creates the current donation, the board member is automatically soft- credited. For every future donation the do6nor makes, the system will continue to grant that soft credit automatically, satisfying th7e requirement to track all future gifts without manual intervention.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option A and D: These suggest adding the soft credit manually to the current donation. While this works for the current gift, it does not address the "any future donations" requirement, which would require the fundraiser to remember to do it every single time.
* Option C: Partial Soft Credits are used for splitting gifts among multiple people (e.g., $50 to person A, $50 to person B). It is more complex than needed here and does not have the automated "future" triggering logic found in the Relationship-based soft credit model.
質問 # 62
A nonprofit hired a consultant to restart a stalled implementation. The nonprofit identified needs by documenting its Salesforce vision and pain points and by defining specific goals with user stories. What are two components of a user story the nonprofit should consider? (Choose 2)
正解：B、C
解説：
User stories are the "building blocks" of an Agile implementation. A well-written user story follows the format: "As a [persona], I want to [action], so that [value/benefit]." To ensure a stalled project gets back on track, two critical components are alignment and prioritization.
* Vision Alignment (B): Every story must have a purpose that contributes to the overall Implementation Vision. If a nonprofit's vision is "Improving Donor Retention," but a user story is created for "Automating Facilities Management," the consultant must evaluate if that story is a distraction. Aligning stories to the vision ensures the consultant builds what the organization actually needs to succeed, rather than just what users want.
* Priority (C): In any implementation, there is limited time and budget. Assigning a priority (often using the MoSCoW method: Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) is essential. It allows the consultant and the nonprofit to focus on mission-critical features first, ensuring that if the project runs out of resources, the most valuable parts of the system are already delivered.
Why other options are less critical:
* Configuration Instructions (Option A): This is a mistake. User stories describe the requirement (the
"What"), while technical documentation describes the solution (the "How"). Putting configuration steps in a user story makes it rigid and difficult for a developer to suggest better technical alternatives.
* Epics (Option D): While epics are useful for grouping stories, they are a structural tool for project management rather than a "component" of the story's internal logic or value definition. Alignment and Priority are what drive project success.
質問 # 63
A nonprofit needs to track key information for grants it applies for and receives, such as deadline dates, activity completion dates, and descriptions. In addition, the nonprofit wants to track actions completed and view the next deadline date on the Opportunity. Which feature should the consultant recommend?
正解：C
解説：
For a nonprofit engaged in Grant Seeking, the Deliverables object in NPSP is the specific tool designed to manage the high-stakes requirements of institutional funding.34 Why Deliverables (D) are the best fit:56
* Grant-Specific 7Metadata: Unlike standard Tasks, Deliverables include fields specific to the gr8ant process, such as "Grantee Requirements," "Due Date," and "Requirement Description."
* Next Deadline Visibility: NPSP has built-in automation that identifies the "earliest" incomplete Deliverable and surfaces its date on the parent Opportunity record in the "Next Deliverable Date" field. This allows the fundraising team to see their upcoming deadlines at a glance without digging into related lists.
* Audit and Compliance: Deliverables allow the organization to track not just that a "Task" was finished, but that a specific legal or financial report was submitted. You can track "Submitted" and
"Confirmed" dates, which are vital for maintaining good standing with a funder.
While Engagement Plans (Option A) and Tasks (Option B) can be used for general "Moves Management," they lack the specialized fields and the automated "Next Deadline" rollup logic that makes Deliverables the gold standard for grant management in NPSP.
質問 # 64
An annual fund coordinator wants to create a report that identifies which individual donors have yet to make a gift toward the Annual Fund Campaign this year. It is important that the annual giving coordinator avoids soliciting any individuals who are attending an upcoming gala. The nonprofit uses Campaigns to track event attendance. What should a consultant add to the report to exclude gala attendees?
正解：B
解説：
This is a "Who Has NOT" reporting requirement, which is the primary use case for Cross Filters in Salesforce.
How to build this report:
* Base Report: Create a report of Contacts (or "Contacts with Opportunities").
* Annual Fund Filter: Set the standard report filters to show only those who have $0 in giving for the current year.
* The Exclusion (Cross Filter): Click the "Filters" dropdown and select Add Cross Filter.
* Configuration: * Set the filter to: Contacts WITHOUT Campaign Members.
* Add a sub-filter to the cross filter: Campaign Name EQUALS [Upcoming Gala Name].
* Result: The report will now list only people who are donors but are not currently registered for the Gala.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Filter Logic (Option A): This is used for "AND/OR" statements between existing fields (e.g., 1 AND (2 OR 3)). It cannot easily look "across" to the Campaign Member object to check for the absence of a record.
* Summary Formula (Option C) and Bucket Field (Option D): These are used for calculating or grouping data that is present in the report; they cannot be used to exclude records based on their relationship to other objects.
質問 # 65
The development director wants all users to only see Engagement Plans on Opportunity records for donations with an Amount greater than 10,000. How should this be accomplished?
正解：B
解説：
To meet this requirement, a consultant should leverage Dynamic Lightning Pages, specifically using Component Visibility Filters. This allows for a declarative solution that does not require multiple page layouts or custom code.
Step-by-Step Implementation:
* Edit the Page: Navigate to an Opportunity record and select Edit Page from the Setup (gear) icon to open the Lightning App Builder.
* Add the Component: Drag the Related List - Single component onto the page layout.
* Configure the Component: In the component properties sidebar, set the Related List to "Engagement Plans."
* Set Visibility Filter: Scroll down to the Set Component Visibility section and click + Add Filter.
* Define Criteria: * Field: Amount
* Operator: Greater Than
* Value: 10,000
* Save and Activate: Save the page. When "All Users" (per the requirement) view an Opportunity, the Engagement Plan related list will simply be invisible if the amount is $10,000 or less. If it is $10,001 or more, the component will appear.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option A: Assigning the page only to the development director's profile violates the requirement that
"all users" should see it when the criteria is met.
* Option B: This is an overly complex and disjointed user experience that doesn't actually filter the view based on the specific Opportunity's amount.
* Option C: A custom component is unnecessary "Technical Debt" since standard functionality meets the requirement perfectly.
質問 # 66
......
NP-Con-102試験に合格して証明書を取得する方法に関する質問を検討していますか？最良の答えは、NP-Con-102クイズトレントをダウンロードして学習することです。 NP-Con-102試験の質問は、必要なものを短時間で取得するのに役立ちます。 NP-Con-102トレーニング準備を購入した後、ダウンロードしてインストールするのに少し時間が必要です。その後、学習するのに約20〜30時間かかります。 NP-Con-102試験ガイドをご覧いただき、貴重な時間を割いていただければ幸いです。
NP-Con-102認定テキスト: https://www.jpexam.com/NP-Con-102_exam.html
ちなみに、Jpexam NP-Con-102の一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-6f3mDWChFQC9DfK15LpqpOEGextP8cC