P.S.TopexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 Medical Professional CCMダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xUfHf5bU-0oVp6aezqNnB-cfrlApkti-
持ってきた製品があなたにふさわしくないと感じることはよくありますか？ CCM学習ガイドを使用することに決めた場合、問題に遭遇することは決してないことを伝えたいと思います。私たちのCCM学習教材は、あなたが期待できない高品質を持っています。 CCM学習教材のガイダンスで経験を積むと、以前よりも短時間で過ごすことができ、明らかに進歩を感じることができます。また、CCMのテストクイズは、進歩に役立つことがわかります。 。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Quality and Outcomes Evaluation | - Quality improvement methods - Outcome measurement and evaluation |
| Topic 2: Rehabilitation and Disability Management | - Rehabilitation principles - Return-to-work planning |
| Topic 3: Ethics, Legal, and Regulatory Aspects | - Professional ethics in case management - Legal and regulatory compliance |
| Topic 4: Psychosocial and Support Systems | - Community resources and support systems - Psychosocial assessment |
| Topic 5: Care Delivery and Reimbursement Methods | - Healthcare delivery systems - Insurance and reimbursement structures |
Topexamは実環境であなたの本当のMedical Professional CCM試験に準備するプロセスを見つけられます。もしあなたが初心者だったら、または自分の知識や専門的なスキルを高めたいのなら、TopexamのMedical ProfessionalのCCM問題集があなたを助けることができ、一歩一歩でその念願を実現することにヘルプを差し上げます。TopexamのMedical ProfessionalのCCMは試験に関する全ての質問が解決して差し上げられます。それに一年間の無料更新サービスを提供しますから、Topexamのウェブサイトをご覧ください。
質問 # 76
(Under the FIDIC Red, Yellow, and Silver Books (edition 1999), which of the following entitlements of the Employer can result in a deduction of the Contract Price and Payment Certificates subject to Sub-Clause 2.5?
(2 correct answers apply))
正解：B、C
解説：
Under FIDIC 1999, Sub-Clause 2.5 [Employer's Claims] provides that the Employer is entitled to make claims against the Contractor, which may result in deductions from the Contract Price and from Interim Payment Certificates.
Option C is correct. Delay Damages (Sub-Clause 8.7) are a classic example of Employer's entitlement. If the Contractor fails to complete within the Time for Completion, the Employer is entitled to delay damages, which are typically deducted directly from payments due.
Option A is also correct. Under provisions relating to Nominated Subcontractors (Sub-Clause 5.4), if the Employer pays a nominated subcontractor directly (e.g., due to Contractor default), such payments may be recovered from the Contractor and deducted from the Contract Price via Sub-Clause 2.5.
Option B is incorrect because costs related to reviewing Contractor's Documents are generally part of the Engineer's duties and are not recoverable from the Contractor unless explicitly stated.
Option D is incorrect because the use of Employer's materials is typically accounted for within the contract pricing structure and not treated as a claim under Sub-Clause 2.5.
Thus, Sub-Clause 2.5 serves as a key mechanism for the Employer to recover amounts due through deductions, particularly in cases like delay damages and payments made on behalf of the Contractor.
質問 # 77
(Under FIDIC Red and Yellow Books (both editions) the Engineer must have received technical education. Is this statement true or false?)
正解：B
解説：
Under both FIDIC Red and Yellow Books (1999 and 2017 editions), the Engineer is defined as the person appointed by the Employer to carry out duties assigned under the Contract (Clause 3). However, FIDIC does not prescribe any specific qualification, such as requiring the Engineer to have a formal technical education.
The contract focuses on the role and functions of the Engineer rather than formal credentials. The Engineer is expected to act as a professional administrator of the contract, performing duties such as issuing instructions, certifying payments, making determinations, and acting neutrally when required (especially under FIDIC
2017, Clause 3.7). While in practice Engineers are typically qualified professionals (often engineers by training), this is a matter of industry practice, not a contractual requirement.
FIDIC intentionally avoids prescribing qualifications to allow flexibility for the Employer in appointing a suitable representative with the necessary competence and experience for the specific project. The emphasis is on capability and impartiality, rather than formal academic credentials.
Therefore, the statement is false because FIDIC contracts do not mandate that the Engineer must have received technical education
質問 # 78
(Golden Principle 2 states that " The Particular Conditions must be drafted clearly and unambiguously. " Which statement best underlines this Golden Principle in relation to the FIDIC Red, Yellow, and Silver Books (both editions)?)
正解：D
解説：
FIDIC Golden Principle 2 (GP2) emphasizes that Particular Conditions must be drafted clearly, precisely, and without ambiguity, ensuring that any modification to the General Conditions is transparent and easily understood.
Option D directly reflects this requirement. It highlights that any changes to the General Conditions must be explicitly referenced to the relevant Sub-Clauses and must clearly indicate the nature of the modification (addition, replacement, omission, etc.). This approach ensures traceability, avoids confusion, and preserves the contractual clarity essential for proper administration and dispute avoidance.
Options A, B, and C all contradict the Golden Principles by promoting ambiguity or informal modification practices. Allowing inconsistent clarifications, relying on implicit amendments, or incorporating changes via emails without properly integrating them into the Particular Conditions undermines contractual certainty and increases the risk of disputes.
From a contract management perspective, clear drafting of Particular Conditions is critical to maintaining the integrity of FIDIC contracts, ensuring that all Parties have a shared and precise understanding of their rights and obligations.
Thus, Option D best reflects the intent and application of FIDIC Golden Principle 2.
質問 # 79
(Which two FIDIC Books (edition 2017) should especially be considered for use if the Employer needs the Contractor to take responsibility for the design and execution of the project. The construction will involve substantial work underground or work in other areas which tenderers cannot inspect.
Choose all of the correct answers (multiple possibilities).)
正解：A、C
解説：
The key issue in this question is the allocation of design responsibility and the treatment of unforeseeable physical conditions (particularly relevant for underground works or inaccessible areas).
The Yellow Book 2017 is specifically designed for projects where the Contractor is responsible for both design and execution, while still maintaining a balanced risk allocation. Importantly, Sub-Clause 4.12
[Unforeseeable Physical Conditions] allows the Contractor to claim additional time and/or cost for conditions that could not reasonably have been foreseen. Therefore, for projects involving underground or uninspectable works, the Yellow Book is highly appropriate. Hence, Option A is correct.
The Silver Book 2017 (EPC/Turnkey) also places full responsibility for design and execution on the Contractor. However, it adopts a much stricter risk allocation: the Contractor generally bears the risk of unforeseen physical conditions. This makes it less suitable for projects with significant uncertainty-unless amendments are made. By modifying Sub-Clause 4.12 in the Particular Conditions to reallocate risk (e.g., allowing relief for unforeseeable conditions), the Silver Book can be adapted for such projects. Therefore, Option C is correct.
Option B (Red Book) is incorrect because design responsibility primarily lies with the Employer, not the Contractor.
Option D is incorrect because using the Silver Book without amendment would place excessive and potentially unmanageable risk on the Contractor in cases involving unknown subsurface conditions.
This reflects a core FIDIC principle: selecting the appropriate form depends heavily on risk allocation and the degree of uncertainty in site conditions.
質問 # 80
(In a FIDIC Red Book, the Employer shall have prepared (or have prepared by a design consultant) all the design for the Works. Which of the listed documents form the basis for this design (2 correct answers apply))
正解：A、D
解説：
Under the FIDIC Red Book (both 1999 and 2017 editions), the Employer is responsible for the design of the Works. This design is primarily communicated to the Contractor through key technical documents included in the Contract.
Option B (Specifications) is correct because Specifications define the technical requirements, standards, materials, workmanship, and performance criteria. They are a core component of the design documentation and directly guide how the Works are to be executed.
Option A (Bill of Quantities) is also correct. While primarily used for measurement and payment, the Bill of Quantities is derived from the design and reflects the quantified scope of the Works. It is intrinsically linked to the design and provides a structured breakdown of the elements required to construct the Works.
Option C is incorrect because the Breakdown of Lump-Sum is relevant to lump-sum contracts (e.g., Silver Book), not the Red Book's remeasurement approach.
Option D is incorrect as the Schedule of Subcontractors relates to execution planning, not design.
Option E is incorrect because the Contract Agreement is a legal document formalizing the contract, not a design document.
Thus, in Red Book contracts, the design basis is fundamentally established through the Specifications and the Bill of Quantities, supported typically by Drawings (though not listed here).
質問 # 81
......
CCM試験シミュレーションのコンテンツシステムは、専門家によって構築されています。 CCM学習教材のアフターサービスも専門家によって提供されます。製品の使用中に問題が発生した場合は、いつでも入手できます。 CCM準備の質問を選択すると、プロフェッショナルサービスにより、最適な方法でそれを使用し、それを最大限に活用し、最高の学習結果をもたらすことができます。弊社のCCM学習教材は、作成の最初の段階で、認定資格を取得するための専門的な態度を持っています。
CCM勉強ガイド: https://www.topexam.jp/CCM_shiken.html
P.S.TopexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 Medical Professional CCMダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xUfHf5bU-0oVp6aezqNnB-cfrlApkti-