In this high-speed world, a waste of time is equal to a waste of money. As an electronic product, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization real study dumps have the distinct advantage of fast delivery. Once our customers pay successfully, we will check about your email address and other information to avoid any error, and send you the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Prep Guide in 5-10 minutes, so you can get our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions at first time. And then you can start your study after downloading the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions in the email attachments.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Coverage optimization methods - Interference analysis and mitigation - Handover optimization - Load balancing techniques - Parameter tuning best practices - Capacity optimization strategies |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Network failure identification and resolution - Optimization case studies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Root cause analysis methodologies - Common performance issues diagnosis |
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Automated optimization features - Report generation and interpretation - Configuration management for optimization - Nokia NetAct and performance tools |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Threshold configuration and alerting - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Performance data collection and analysis - KPI definition and measurement - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - Single RAN integration principles - SRAN solution components and functions - Radio access concepts and principles |
>> SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Materials <<
If you are a college student, you can learn and use online resources through the student learning platform over the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study materials. And for an office worker, the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study engine is desighed to their different learning arrangement as well, such extensive audience greatly improved the core competitiveness of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice quiz, which is according to their aptitude, on-demand, maximum to provide users with better suited to their specific circumstances.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.
NEW QUESTION # 26
The CB009425 feature provides several enhancements to improve the transmission link budget for VoNR, offering a better customer experience. Which statements are correct regarding this feature?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D.
The feature is focused on improving VoNR link robustness and user experience, especially near the cell edge or in difficult RF conditions. VoNR is sensitive to packet loss, delay, and uplink coverage limitations.
Therefore, link-budget improvement features commonly target BLER behavior, transport block sizing, and MCS robustness.
Statement A is correct because minimizing Packet Loss Rate, or PLR, directly improves VoNR speech quality and reduces mute, clipping, or robotic voice effects.
Statement B is correct because VoNR bearers can use specific initial BLER targets. A more suitable BLER target helps the scheduler choose a more robust MCS for voice traffic.
Statement C is correct because a configurable uplink minimum TBS, or Transport Block Size, helps ensure that small VoNR packets are transmitted efficiently and reliably.
Statement D is correct because MCS downgrade control can improve robustness by selecting a more conservative modulation and coding scheme for VoNR DRBs when radio conditions require it.
Therefore, all listed enhancements are part of the VoNR link-budget improvement concept:
A, B, C, and D.
NEW QUESTION # 27
A customer complains about coverage reduction after modernization of 4G TDD 4x4 sites to Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 with AEHC module 64T64R . Which of the following statements regarding RF design changes to increase the coverage is correct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In a Concurrent mMIMO B41/n41 AEHC 64T64R deployment, LTE and NR share the same Massive MIMO active antenna system. Public Nokia material identifies AEHC as an AirScale Massive MIMO
64T64R B41 radio product, and Nokia's AirScale Massive MIMO portfolio is designed for high-capacity 5G
/RAN deployments.
Unlike a passive antenna system where coverage is changed mainly by physical/electrical RET, Massive MIMO coverage is strongly influenced by beamforming profiles and beamforming weight parameters . In concurrent LTE/NR operation, the RF design must consider the shared active antenna behavior, not independent passive RET-style tilt control per technology.
Therefore, for concurrent 4G/5G mMIMO coverage adjustment, the correct statement is:
The tilt/coverage behavior for both 4G and 5G is controlled by mMIMOSecSectorBFProfName and beamforming weight profile parameters.
NEW QUESTION # 28
What is the mandatory prerequisite to implement DSS , or Dynamic Spectrum Sharing ?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is D .
DSS allows LTE and 5G NR to share the same spectrum dynamically , instead of requiring a separate dedicated NR carrier. Therefore, dedicated NR spectrum is not mandatory. DSS is also not limited to TDD only; it is commonly used in FDD spectrum refarming scenarios as well. Public RAN references describe DSS as a mechanism where LTE and NR coexist in the same frequency band and share spectrum dynamically.
From an SRAN architecture point of view, the mandatory deployment condition is that the radio platform must support LTE and NR coexistence on the same radio resources. That requires RF module sharing or a DSS-capable shared radio configuration.
So the correct prerequisite is:
RF module sharing.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
NEW QUESTION # 30
......
At any point in the process of buying our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam braindumps, the customer does not need to check the status of the purchase order, because as long as you have paid for it, then you can get it in a second. With all those efficiency, our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study engine is suitable in this high-speed society. With strong strength in this career, we can claim that you can only study our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning guide for 20 to 30 hours, you can pass your SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam with 100% guarantee.
SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Certification Materials: https://www.braindumpstudy.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization_braindumps.html