P.S. Kostenlose und neue Integration-Architect Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Fast2test verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1y2lK82WMpLtb8DAa3yX6cxvu5oZZScHi
Was andere sagen ist nicht so wichtig, was Sie empfinden ist am alle wichtigsten. Wir hoffen, dass Sie unsere Ehrlichkeit und Anstrengung empfinden. Deshalb bieten wir Ihnen kostenlose Demo der Salesforce Integration-Architect Prüfungsunterlagen. Probieren Sie bevor dem Kauf! Lassen Sie sich mehr beruhigen. Nach dem Kauf bieten wir Ihnen weiter Kundendienst. Wenn die Salesforce Integration-Architect Prüfungsunterlagen aktualisieren, geben wir Ihnen sofort Bescheid. Innerhalb einem Jahr können Sie kostenlose Aktualisierung der Salesforce Integration-Architect Prüfungsunterlagen genießen.
Die Salesforce Integration-Architect-Prüfung ist in zwei Teile unterteilt: die Multiple-Choice-Prüfung und die szenariobasierte Prüfung. Die Multiple-Choice-Prüfung ist ein 60-Fragen-Test, bei dem das Wissen des Kandidaten über Integrationskonzepte und Best Practices bewertet wird. Die szenariobasierte Prüfung ist ein praktischer Test, bei dem der Kandidat eine komplexe Integrationslösung mithilfe der Salesforce-Plattform entwirft und implementiert.
>> Integration-Architect Prüfungsfragen <<
In den letzten Jahren entwickelt sich die IT-Branche sehr schnell. Viele Leute fangen an, IT-Kenntnisse zu lernen. Sie geben viel Mühe aus, um eine bessere Zukunft zu haben. Die Salesforce Integration-Architect Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine unentbehrliche Zertifizierungsprüfung in der IT-Branche. Viele Leute machen sich große Sorgen um die Prüfung. Heute empfehle ich Ihnen einen gute Methode, nämlich, die Fragenkataloge zur Salesforce Integration-Architect Zertifizierungsprüfung von Fast2test zu kaufen. Sie können Ihnen helfen, die Salesforce Integration-Architect Zertifizierungsprüfung 100% zu bestehen. Sonst geben wir Ihnen eine volle Rückerstattung. Und Sie würden keine Verluste erleiden.
Salesforce Integration-Architect (Salesforce Certified Integration Architect) Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine Zertifizierung, die ein Fachwissen eines Fachmanns bei der Integration von Salesforce in andere Systeme zeigt. Die Prüfung soll das Wissen und die Fähigkeiten einer Person bei der Gestaltung und Implementierung komplexer Integrationslösungen testen, die Salesforce mit anderen Anwendungen, Systemen, Datenbanken und Technologien verbinden.
Die Salesforce Integration-Architect-Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine verteilte Prüfung, die aus 60 Fragen der Multiple-Choice-Fragen besteht. Die Prüfungsdauer beträgt 120 Minuten und die Kandidaten müssen mindestens 67% bewerten, um die Prüfung zu bestehen. Die Prüfungsgebühr beträgt 400 US -Dollar, und die Kandidaten können die Prüfung in einem prozentierten Testzentrum oder online ablegen.
45. Frage
What should an integration architect recommend to ensure all integrations to the Northern Trail Outfitters' company portal use SSL mutual authentication?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
To ensure that all integrations calling into a Salesforce portal are secured with Mutual Authentication, the architect must enable and configure specific platform-level security settings. The primary recommendation is to Enforce SSL/TLS Mutual Authentication for the relevant integration users.
Mutual Authentication (Two-way SSL) adds a layer of trust beyond the standard session-based authentication.
When enforced, the Salesforce server requires the calling client to present a valid CA-signed certificate that matches a certificate stored in the org. This ensures that only authorized systems with the correct private key can establish a connection.
To implement this, the architect must first work with Salesforce support to enable the feature. Once enabled, a Mutual Authentication Certificate must be uploaded to the org, and a specific user profile-cloned for integration purposes-must have the "Enforce SSL/TLS Mutual Authentication" permission enabled. This configuration forces the client to use port 8443 (the dedicated port for mutual TLS) for API calls, providing a highly secure, server-to-server connection that protects against impersonation and unauthorized data access.
46. Frage
A company needs to integrate a legacy on-premise application that can only support SOAP API. After the integration architect evaluates the requirements and volume, they determine that the Fire and Forget integration pattern will be most appropriate for sending data from Salesforce to the external application and getting response back in a strongly-typed format.
Which integration capabilities should be used to integrate the two systems?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
When integrating with a legacy SOAP-only application using a Fire and Forget pattern, Salesforce Outbound Messaging is the native, declarative choice.
Outbound Messaging is a platform feature that sends a SOAP message to a designated endpoint when specific criteria are met. It is inherently asynchronous and provides built-in reliability; if the legacy system is offline, Salesforce will automatically retry the delivery for up to 24 hours. This perfectly fits the "Fire and Forget" requirement.
For the strongly-typed response back (Remote Call-In), the Enterprise WSDL is the correct recommendation.1415
* Enterprise WSDL: This is a strongly-typed WSDL generated specifically for one org's metadata. It includes specific references to16 custom objects and fields, ensu17ring that the legacy system can communicate with Salesforce using a rigid, predictable data structure.
* Partner WSDL (Option C): This is a loosely-typed WSDL designed for developers building tools that must work across many different orgs; it is not ideal for an internal, strongly-typed legacy integration.
While Platform Events (Option B) are a modern alternative, they typically use REST or Streaming APIs, making them a less natural fit for an application that "can only support SOAP". By combining Outbound Messaging and the Enterprise WSDL, the architect provides a robust, SOAP-native solution that satisfies the business's technical constraints and reliability requirements.
47. Frage
A company that is a leading provider of courses and training delivers courses using third party trainers. The trainer for the company has to be verified from 10 different training accreditation verification agencies before providing training for the company. Each training accreditation agency has its own response time, whichcould take days to confirm a trainer.
The company decided to automate the trainer accreditation verification process by integrating to the agencies' web services.
What is the recommended approach to automate this process?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Answer D is valid because using middleware to handle the call out to the 10 different verification services is a scalable and reliable solution that can handle the complexity and variability of the integration. The middlewarecan orchestrate the calls to the different web services, consolidate the verification results, and handle any errors or retries. The middleware can then make a call-in to Salesforce and update the verificationstatus to "verified" using an API or a platform event12 Answer A is not valid because using Salesforce external service to make the call out to the 10 different verification services is not a feasible or efficient solution. Salesforce external service is a feature that allows invoking anexternal service from a flow and mapping its inputs and outputs to flow variables. However, this feature requires configuring an Apex action, a named credential, and an external service definition for each web service, which is not a low code solution. Moreover, this feature does not support checking the verification agencies untilthe result is verified, as it only invokes the external service once per flow interview3 Answer B is not valid because creating a trigger on the trainer record to make a callout to each verification agency is not a recommended or robust solution. Triggers are Apex code that execute before or after database events, such as insert, update, or delete. However, triggers cannot make callouts directly, as they are part of a database transaction and must complete quickly. To make a callout from a trigger, an asynchronous process such as a future method or a queueablejob must be used, which adds complexity and overhead to the integration. Moreover, triggershave limits on the number of callouts and asynchronous calls they can make per transaction, which may affect the scalability and reliability of the integration.
Answer C is not valid because making an Apex callout using @future annotation to make the call out to all different agencies is not a suitable or reliable solution. The @future annotation allows marking a method for execution at a later time when system resources become available. However, this annotation has several limitations and drawbacks, such as:
Future methods cannot return values, so they cannot update the trainer status to "verified" directly.
Future methods have limits on the number of callouts andfuture calls they can make per execution, which may affect the scalability and reliability of the integration.
Future methods run in their own thread and do not share any static variables or state with other methods, which makes it difficult to consolidatethe verification results from different agencies.
Future methods are not guaranteed to execute at a specific time or order, which may affect the timeliness and accuracy of the integration.
1: Orchestration Pattern 2: RemoteProcess Invocation-Request and Reply 3: External Services : Apex Developer Guide: Triggers : Apex Developer Guide: Using Future Methods
48. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public web site forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes.
Which two approaches will require the least amount of development effort?
Choose 2 answers
Antwort: A,C
49. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters wants to improve the quality of call-outs from Salesforce to their REST APIs. For this purpose, they will require all API clients/consumers to adhere to RESTAPI Markup Language (RAML) specifications that include field-level definition of every API request and response payload. RAML specs serve as interface contracts that Apex REST API Clients can rely on.
Which two design specifications should the Integration Architect include in the integration architecture to ensure that Apex REST API Clients unit tests confirm adherence to the RAML specs?
Choose 2 answers
Antwort: C,D
50. Frage
......
Integration-Architect Zertifizierungsprüfung: https://de.fast2test.com/Integration-Architect-premium-file.html
P.S. Kostenlose 2026 Salesforce Integration-Architect Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Fast2test verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1y2lK82WMpLtb8DAa3yX6cxvu5oZZScHi