The emerging Nokia field creates a space for Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) certification exam holders to accelerate their careers. Many unfortunate candidates don't get the Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) certification because they prepare for its Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam questions from an Nokia 4A0-D03 exam that dumps outdated material. It results in a waste of time and money. You can develop your skills and join the list of experts by earning this Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) certification exam.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| BGP EVPN Control Plane Operations | - Multi-homing scenarios
|
| SR Linux Data Center Architecture | - Fabric design principles
|
| Data Center Interconnect (DCI) | - Interconnecting data centers with EVPN
|
| EVPN Fundamentals | - EVPN architecture and control plane
|
>> 4A0-D03 Certification Cost <<
If you are looking to be Nokia 4A0-D03 certified. VCEPrep is here to provide you with the best Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam dumps through which you can clear your Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) certification exam. We are providing practice exams in three formats including PDF which is the downloadable file from which you can study for your Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam questions and our Web-based application provides you the facility to assess yourself without installing any software on your device to prepare you for Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03)exam dumps.
NEW QUESTION # 12
Which of the following statements about PE-CE routing is FALSE?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
PE-CE routing is the mechanism used to exchange customer prefix reachability between a provider edge or data center leaf and the attached customer edge router. It can be implemented statically or dynamically. Static routing is operationally simple but does not scale well when many prefixes or frequent changes are involved. BGP is preferred for larger deployments because it supports policy, route filtering, attributes, and automated advertisement of changing reachability. In most EVPN PE-CE designs, eBGP is preferred because it creates a clean routing boundary between the PE and CE, with each device operating in a different autonomous system. Option D is false because the CE does not advertise BGP EVPN route type 5 updates to the PE. The CE advertises ordinary IPv4 or IPv6 unicast prefixes over the PE-CE routing session. The PE then imports those customer prefixes into the IP-VRF and advertises them into the EVPN overlay as route type 5 IP Prefix routes toward other PEs. This distinction matters: EVPN signaling is a PE-to-PE overlay function, not a CE-originated EVPN control-plane role. Reference: PE-CE routing, eBGP, EVPN RT-5 prefix advertisement.
NEW QUESTION # 13
Which of the following statements about the configuration of a distributed Layer 2 EVPN in a Nokia SR Linux is FALSE?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
A distributed Layer 2 EVPN in SR Linux is implemented using MAC-VRF network instances, EVPN control-plane signaling, and VXLAN data-plane encapsulation. A common mistake is assuming that every PE must use the same EVI value for the same L2 service. In SR Linux, the important operational requirement is that the correct EVPN routes are imported and exported using matching route-target policy, not necessarily that every PE has the same locally configured EVI. Therefore, option A is false. The route distinguisher can be automatically generated using local values such as the autonomous system number and EVI, giving each PE's EVPN routes uniqueness in MP-BGP. A MAC-VRF is associated with VXLAN encapsulation for its data-plane service mapping, and route targets may need to be manually configured when leaf routers are in different autonomous systems because automatic derivation may not produce matching import/export policy across AS boundaries. The key separation is this: the RD gives uniqueness, the route target controls service membership, and the EVI is a local service identifier rather than a universal mandatory match in all designs. Reference: SR Linux distributed L2 EVPN configuration, EVI, RD auto-generation, route-target policy.
NEW QUESTION # 14
Which of the following statements about configuring and using an integrated routing and bridging (IRB) interface is TRUE?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
An IRB interface is the logical connection point between a Layer 2 MAC-VRF and a Layer 3 IP-VRF. It provides the routed gateway function for hosts in the bridge domain while allowing traffic to move into the routed VRF for inter-subnet forwarding. The correct statement is that when an IRB sub-interface has multiple IP addresses, one can be designated as the primary. This is important because the primary address is used for normal gateway or subnet behavior when more than one address is present on the same routed interface context. Option A is inaccurate because the question is about an IRB sub-interface, not a generic subinterface selection between bridge or routed access modes. Option B is not the defining multi-homing model; EVPN multi-homing is implemented through Ethernet Segment association and MAC-VRF attachment behavior, not by adding multiple IRB subinterfaces for multi-homing. Option D is also wrong because the IRB is the shared logical link between the MAC-VRF and IP-VRF; the design does not require separate IRB subinterfaces on each side as independent constructs. Reference: SR Linux IRB configuration, MAC-VRF to IP-VRF interconnection, primary IP addressing.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Consider the exhibit.
Leaf1 and Leaf2 have the Ethernet segment configured to use the default election algorithm while Leaf3 and Leaf4 are configured to use the preference-based algorithm with Leaf3 having the higher preference value. The DF candidate list is the same on all leaf routers.
Which of the following leafs is the DF for mac-vrf103?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
Designated Forwarder election determines which PE forwards BUM traffic from the EVPN overlay toward a multi-homed Ethernet Segment for a given service. In this scenario, all leaf routers share the same DF candidate list for mac-vrf103, but the election configuration is not identical. Leaf1 and Leaf2 use the default algorithm, while Leaf3 and Leaf4 use the preference-based algorithm. Under preference-based DF election, the candidate with the highest configured preference is selected over lower-preference candidates, assuming the candidate list is valid and consistent. The question states that Leaf3 has the higher preference value compared with Leaf4. Therefore, Leaf3 becomes the DF for mac-vrf103. This is the correct outcome because the preference-based election explicitly overrides simple default behavior by assigning operator-defined priority to a PE. In production designs, this is useful when the operator wants deterministic forwarding placement, maintenance control, or service-specific primary-path selection rather than relying only on the default modulo-based DF selection process. Reference: EVPN DF election, preference-based algorithm, MAC-VRF service forwarding.
NEW QUESTION # 16
Consider the exhibit.
Which of the following is NOT configured on dcgw10 to support the Layer 3 VPN connectivity?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From [SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect/Course Guide/topics]:
In an integrated gateway-based data center interconnect design, the gateway must interwork between the data center EVPN/VXLAN domain and the WAN VPN transport domain. For Layer 3 VPN connectivity on a Nokia 7750 SR integrated gateway, the base BGP instance must support the relevant VPN address families, such as VPN-IPv4 and EVPN, because the gateway participates in control-plane exchange between the data center and WAN sides. The VPRN must also be associated with the WAN transport, normally through MPLS tunnel binding, and the VRF target must match the corresponding VPRN on the remote gateway so that VPN routes are imported and exported correctly. A routed VXLAN interface, however, is an SR Linux IP-VRF/VXLAN construct used for symmetric L3 EVPN forwarding inside a VXLAN-based data center fabric. In this question, dcgw10 is acting as the integrated WAN gateway for L3VPN connectivity, so a routed VXLAN interface is not the required configuration item on the VPRN instance. Reference: integrated gateway DCI, VPRN over MPLS, EVPN-to-VPN interworking.
NEW QUESTION # 17
......
You can try the Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam dumps demo before purchasing. If you like our Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam questions features, you can get the full version after payment. VCEPrep Nokia 4A0-D03 Dumps give surety to confidently pass the Nokia SR Linux EVPN and Data Center Interconnect (4A0-D03) exam on the first attempt.
Test 4A0-D03 Tutorials: https://www.vceprep.com/4A0-D03-latest-vce-prep.html