BONUS！！！ Xhs1991 CFE-Lawダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZaAjYrndeEHdiA2nnNAtVMzpGSl50tl5
CFE-Law学習資料では、すべてのお客様が選択できる3つの異なるバージョンを設計しています。 3つの異なるバージョンには、PDFバージョン、ソフトウェアバージョン、オンラインバージョンが含まれ、お客様が質問を解決し、すべてのニーズを満たすのに役立ちます。 CFE-Law学習資料の3つの異なるバージョンはすべてのお客様に同じデモを提供しますが、すべてのお客様の異なる固有のニーズを満たす特定の機能も備えています。 CFE-Law学習教材のオンラインバージョンの最も重要な機能は実用性です。
ACFE CFE-Law（Certified Fraud Examiner）認定試験は、詐欺調査の分野における知識と専門性を証明する専門認定資格です。この試験は、銀行、医療、政府など様々な産業において詐欺を検出、調査、予防する能力を試すよう設計されています。この資格は業界で高く評価されており、詐欺調査の分野における卓越性のマークとして世界的に認められています。
Xhs1991のACFE CFE-Law認定試験の問題集について知っていますか？なぜCFE-Law練習問題集を使った人達は口をきわめてほめたたえますか？本当に効果があるかどうかを試したいですか？では、Xhs1991のサイトを訪問してACFE CFE-Law認定試験の対策問題集をダウンロードしてください。ACFE CFE-Law認証試験に関連する各問題集はデモ版を提供されていますから、先ず体験して、もしよければ、あなたが愛用する版を購入することができます。ACFE CFE-Law試験練習問題集を購入して後、また一年間の無料更新サービスを得ることもできます。一年以内に、あなたが持っている資料を更新したい限り、Xhs1991は最新バージョンの問題集を捧げます。この勉強資料があれば、楽にACFE CFE-Law認定試験に合格することができます。
ACFE CFE-Law 認定試験は、法執行、会計、監査など関連分野で仕事をしているプロフェッショナルを含む多様な人々が受験資格を持ちます。試験を受験するためには、最低でも学士号以上の学歴、詐欺調査に関連する分野での最低2年の専門経験など、ある程度の教育と専門能力を持つ必要があります。試験は、それぞれ2時間の四つのセクションから成り、多肢選択問題やケーススタディが含まれています。試験に合格すると、CFE-Law 認定を取得でき、有効期間は2年で、継続的な教育を受けることが必要です。
質問 # 186
In jurisdictions that allow for corporate criminal liability which of the following is typically required for the corporation to be vicariously liable for the acts of one of its employees?
正解：D
解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.
The correct answer is D: The employee was acting within the scope of their employment.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 1: Overview of the Legal System
- criminal
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
質問 # 187
While performing due diligence on a potential vendor, a company finds the vendor's name on a government list. The list states that the vendor is prohibited from bidding on government contracts for three years. Which type of administrative penalty was imposed against the vendor?
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is C. Debarment. In fraud, corruption, and procurement-related enforcement, debarment is the administrative penalty that bars a person or company from participating in government contracting for a specified period. The key fact in this question is that the vendor is prohibited from bidding on government contracts for three years. That is the classic effect of a debarment order.
This differs from license suspension or license revocation, which relate to permission to engage in a regulated activity or profession, not specifically to eligibility for public contracting. Delisting is also not the most accurate term here because it usually refers more generally to removal from an approved list or roster, while debarment specifically denotes exclusion from government contracts or procurement opportunities. The CFE Law materials discuss debarment as a significant administrative consequence in anti-corruption enforcement contexts, particularly where misconduct affects public contracting and business with government entities. A time-limited ban on bidding is therefore best described as debarment, not a licensing action. Because the question directly describes exclusion from government contract bidding for a stated period, C is the most accurate answer.
質問 # 188
Which of the following is NOT a right of the accused under the United Nations' (UN) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)?
正解：B
解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, civil, the question asks about UN, ICCPR, NOT.
The correct answer is C: Right to a trial by jury.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 1: Overview of the Legal System
- criminal
- civil
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
質問 # 189
Which of the following statements concerning money services businesses MSBs is MOST ACCURATE?
正解：D
解説：
Under the ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section, specifically in the Money Laundering chapter , money services businesses MSBs are non-bank financial institutions that provide services such as currency exchange, money transmission, check cashing, issuing or selling money orders, and dealing in stored value.
These entities are specifically recognized in anti-money laundering frameworks because of their exposure to cash-based and cross-border transactions.
A currency exchange clearly falls within the definition of an MSB because it engages in the exchange of one currency for another, often involving large volumes of cash transactions. Such businesses are subject to anti- money laundering compliance requirements, including customer identification procedures, recordkeeping, and reporting of suspicious transactions.
Depository institutions, including commercial or investment banks, are generally regulated as banks rather than MSBs. Furthermore, MSBs are often considered higher risk for money laundering due to the volume of cash transactions and international transfers they process. While MSBs are regulated, they do not typically have stricter regulations than full-service banks, which are subject to comprehensive prudential and AML supervision.
Therefore, the most accurate statement is that a currency exchange is classified as an MSB.
質問 # 190
Mary and Keith live in different countries. Mary believes she has a legal cause of action against Keith.
Because Keith is the defendant, he may file the lawsuit in any court, in either of the countries where he or Mary lives.
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is B. False. A defendant does not ordinarily file the initial lawsuit. In a civil action, the plaintiff-here, Mary-is the party who begins the case by filing a complaint or similar pleading in a court that has proper jurisdiction. The CFE Law materials explain that civil actions generally begin with the filing of a pleading by the plaintiff, usually in the jurisdiction where the defendant resides or where the claim arose.
That directly contradicts the statement in the question.
The statement is also inaccurate because a lawsuit cannot simply be filed in any court in either country. A proper court must have jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter, and venue rules must also be satisfied. In cross-border disputes, those issues can become even more complex, especially where the parties live in different countries. The core error, however, is enough to make the statement false: Keith, as the defendant, does not get to initiate the case merely because he is the defendant. Mary, as the party claiming legal relief, would normally be the one to file. Therefore, under basic civil procedure principles used in the CFE Law topics, the answer is False.
質問 # 191
......
CFE-Law復習解答例: https://www.xhs1991.com/CFE-Law.html
BONUS！！！ Xhs1991 CFE-Lawダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZaAjYrndeEHdiA2nnNAtVMzpGSl50tl5