2026年GoShikenの最新112-57 PDFダンプおよび112-57試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_B3eeeLzwff3GSiZvz2xJU71Am7a8qSl
EC-COUNCILお客様にさまざまな種類の112-57練習用トレントを提供して学習させ、知識の蓄積と能力の向上を支援したいと考えています。また、112-57学習ガイドを使用して、すべてのユーザーの質問に最短時間で専門家が回答できることを保証します。もう1つ、散発的な時間を最大限に活用して知識と情報を吸収するお手伝いをします。つまり、112-57試験対策を目指している他の類似企業と比較して、112-57試験問題のサービスと品質は、お客様と潜在的なクライアントから高く評価されています。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
| トピック 6 |
|
| トピック 7 |
|
人はそれぞれの夢を持っています。あなたの夢は何でしょうか。昇進ですか。あるいは高給ですか。私の夢はEC-COUNCILの112-57認定試験に受かることです。この認証の証明書を持っていたら、全ての難問は解決できるようになりました。この試験に受かるのは難しいですが、大丈夫です。私はGoShikenのEC-COUNCILの112-57試験トレーニング資料を選びましたから。私が自分の夢を実現することを助けられますから。あなたもITに関する夢を持っていたら、速くGoShikenのEC-COUNCILの112-57試験トレーニング資料を選んでその夢を実現しましょう。GoShikenは絶対信頼できるサイトです。
質問 # 19
Which of the following file systems of Windows replaces the first letter of a deleted file name with the hex byte code "e5h"?
正解：D
解説：
InFAT (File Allocation Table)file systems (FAT12/16/32), directory entries are fixed-size records that include an8.3 filename field. When a file is deleted, FAT typically does not immediately erase the file's content; instead, it marks the directory entry as deleted by replacing thefirst character of the filenamewith the special marker byte0xE5(often written asE5h). This is a key forensic behavior because it means the file's metadata entry may still be present in the directory table, and the data clusters may remain recoverable until they are reused and overwritten. Examiners can often reconstruct the original filename's first character only through context or by correlating other artifacts, but the remainder of the directory entry (timestamps, size, starting cluster) can still assist recovery.
The other options do not match this mechanism.NTFSuses Master File Table records and marks deletions differently (file record flags and index changes), not by overwriting the first filename byte with E5h.EFSis an encryption feature layered on NTFS, not a distinct file system deletion marker.FHSis a UNIX/Linux directory layout standard, unrelated to Windows disk structures. Therefore, the correct answer isFAT (A).
質問 # 20
Sam, a digital forensic expert, is working on a case related to file tampering in a system at the administrative department of an organization. In this process, Sam started performing the following steps to analyze the acquired data to draw conclusions related to the case.
1.Analyze the file content for data usage.
2.Analyze the date and time of file creation and modification.
3.Find the users associated with file creation, access, and file modification.
4.Determine the physical storage location of the file.
5.Generate a timeline.
6.Identify the root cause of the incident.
Identify the type of analysis performed by Sam in the above scenario.
正解：A
解説：
The listed actions describe theexamination and interpretation of acquired evidence, which aligns withdata analysisin the digital forensics investigation process. After collection and acquisition, examiners analyze evidence by validating what the data contains (file content and usage), interpretingMAC times(creation
/modification and related timestamps), attributing actions tousers and accounts(who created, accessed, or modified the file), and determiningwhere the file resides physically/logicallyon storage (path, volume, clusters
/blocks, and whether it appears in allocated/unallocated areas). Generating atimelineis a core analytical task used to correlate file events with system activity and other artifacts to reconstruct sequence and intent. Finally,
"identify the root cause of the incident" represents the analytical conclusion derived from correlating artifacts and timeline events.
The other choices do not match the described work.Search and seizureis the legal/field activity of locating and securing evidence sources, not interpreting artifacts.Reportingis the documentation phase after analysis, where findings and methods are written up.Case analysisis broader and can include overall strategy and interpretation, but the question's focus is explicitly on analyzing acquired data and producing forensic conclusions, which isdata analysis.
質問 # 21
Which of the following tools can be used by an investigator to analyze the metadata of files in a Windows- based system?
正解：A
解説：
Bulk Extractoris a digital forensics utility specifically designed to scan storage media (or forensic disk images) and automatically extractstructured artifacts and metadata-like featureswithout relying strictly on file system parsing. In Windows investigations, it is commonly used to identify and pull out items such as email addresses, URLs, domain names, credit card patterns, timestamps, GPS coordinates, and other feature records that can be treated as metadata indicators during triage and deep analysis. Because it works by scanning raw data blocks and producing feature reports, it can recover useful information even when files are deleted, partially corrupted, or when file system structures are damaged-conditions frequently encountered in forensic cases. Investigators use its outputs to correlate user activity, locate sensitive data exposure, and identify evidence-rich regions for further examination with file-level tools.
The other options do not match the requirement of analyzing file metadata broadly.Tor browseris an anonymity-focused web browser, not a forensic metadata analyzer.IECachesViewis a niche utility for viewing Internet Explorer cache/history artifacts rather than general file metadata analysis.Paraben P2 Commandertargets peer-to-peer investigations and related artifacts, not general metadata extraction across files. Therefore, the correct tool for analyzing metadata-like artifacts on a Windows-based system isBulk Extractor (A).
質問 # 22
Clark, a security professional, identified that one of the systems in the organization is infected with malware and was used for creating a backdoor. Clark employed an automated tool to analyze the system's memory and detect malicious activities performed on the system.
In the above scenario, which of the following tools did Clark employ to detect malicious activities performed on the system?
正解：B
解説：
The question specifies anautomated tool to analyze the system's memoryand detect malicious activity associated with amalware backdoor. In malware forensics and incident response practice, memory analysis is used to identify artifacts that may not be reliably visible on disk, such as injected code, hidden processes, suspicious DLLs/modules, live network connections, persistence objects loaded in memory, and indicators of compromise tied to backdoors.Redline(commonly referenced in DFIR training) is purpose-built forhost investigation and memory analysis. It can collect and analyze volatile data, including running processes, loaded modules, handles, drivers, network sessions, and other runtime indicators that help investigators spot malicious behavior and attribute it to specific executables or injected components.
The other options do not align with memory forensics.Medusais primarily a credential brute-force/login auditing tool, not a memory analysis utility.Shodanis an Internet-wide device search engine used for external reconnaissance, not for local host RAM inspection.Wiresharkis a packet capture and protocol analysis tool focused on network traffic, not automated memory artifact collection and analysis. Therefore, the tool Clark used to analyze memory and detect malicious activity isRedline (B).
質問 # 23
Identify the investigation team member who is responsible for evidence gathered at the crime scene and maintains a record of the evidence, making it admissible in a court of law.
正解：A
解説：
The role described-being responsible for evidence gathered at the crime scene and maintaining a record that makes the evidence admissible in court-matches the duties of anEvidence manager. In digital forensics practice, admissibility depends heavily on provingintegrity, authenticity, and continuity of possession. The evidence manager ensures these requirements by implementing and documenting thechain of custody, which is the formal, chronological record of who collected the evidence, when and where it was collected, how it was packaged and labeled, how it was transported, where it was stored, and every time it was accessed or transferred. This role also enforces evidence handling procedures such as tamper-evident sealing, secure storage controls, access logging, and verification steps (for example, ensuring hashes are recorded and preserved for forensic images).
Anincident responderfocuses on containment and immediate actions during an incident; anincident analyzerperforms technical analysis and correlation of artifacts; and anevidence examinerconducts detailed forensic examinations on acquired data. While these roles interact with evidence, the specific responsibility for maintaining custody documentation and evidence records to support legal admissibility belongs to theEvidence manager, makingDthe correct answer.
質問 # 24
......
GoShikenが提供しておりますのは専門家チームの研究した112-57問題と真題で弊社の高い名誉はたぶり信頼をうけられます。安心で弊社の商品を使うために無料な112-57サンブルをダウンロードしてください。
112-57模擬試験問題集: https://www.goshiken.com/EC-COUNCIL/112-57-mondaishu.html
2026年GoShikenの最新112-57 PDFダンプおよび112-57試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_B3eeeLzwff3GSiZvz2xJU71Am7a8qSl