P.S. Free & New Plat-Admn-301 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingQuiz: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AihVSO04W1k3J5moTIw0FXIDBA0oVy94
To prepare successfully in a short time, you need a trusted platform of real and updated Salesforce Plat-Admn-301 exam dumps. Studying with updated Plat-Admn-301 practice questions improve your skills of clearing the certification test in a short time. TrainingQuiz makes it easy for you to prepare successfully for the Plat-Admn-301 Questions in a short time with Plat-Admn-301 Dumps. The product of TrainingQuiz has been prepared under the expert supervision of thousands of experts worldwide.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> Certification Plat-Admn-301 Dumps <<
According to different kinds of questionnaires based on study condition among different age groups, our Plat-Admn-301 test prep is totally designed for these study groups to improve their capability and efficiency when preparing for Salesforce Certified Platform Administrator II Plat-Admn-301 Exams, thus inspiring them obtain the targeted Salesforce Plat-Admn-301 certificate successfully.
NEW QUESTION # 68
Cloud Kicks needs to track government-issued identification numbers for its customers. The security team requires that the identification number cannot changed by users and must be masked when displayed, except the last two digits.
Which two recommended configurators should administrator create? Choose 2 answers
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Shield Platform Encryption is a Salesforce feature that allows you to encrypt sensitive data at rest while preserving critical platform functionality. It uses a combination of tenant secrets, encryption keys, and masking policies to protect your data. A field encryption policy is a set of rules that defines which fields are encrypted and how they are masked when displayed. A field encryption policy can be used to encrypt and mask the identification number field, except for the last two digits. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s
/articleView?id=sf.security_pe_overview.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.
security_pe_field_encryption_policies.htm&type=5
NEW QUESTION # 69
An administrator at Universal Containers has been asked by the compliance team to understand end track various sensitivity levels for its data In Salesforce. The administrator has enabled Data Classification end configured appropriate sensitivity levels. The compliance team would Ike a report showing field level sensitivity and classification.
What should the administrator recommend?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Run the standard Data Classification report is what the administrator should recommend to the compliance team. Data Classification is a feature that allows administrators to flag where sensitive information is stored in Salesforce by assigning sensitivity and classification levels to fields. Data Classification also provides a standard report that shows field level sensitivity and classification for all fields in an org. The administrator can run this report and share it with the compliance team to meet their requirement.
NEW QUESTION # 70
The sales manager at Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to make sure the accounts that CK serves are happy. One way they track this is by how many open cases an account has with CK. The sales manager asks CK's administrator to build a report to show Accounts with Open Cases.
What report type would this be?
Answer: D
Explanation:
A joined report is a type of report that allows you to create multiple report blocks that provide different views of your data. Each report block can have its own fields, columns, sorting, and filtering. A joined report can only be created from summary or matrix reports. You can use a joined report to show data from different report types or data sources on a single report. In this case, you can use a joined report to show Accounts with Open Cases by creating two report blocks: one for accounts and one for cases with a filter for open status.
You can then join the two blocks by a common field such as Account ID or Account Name. References:
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.reports_joined_format.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com
/s/articleView?id=sf.reports_examples_joined.htm&type=5
NEW QUESTION # 71
AW Computing has a new requirement from its security team where audit information relating to an account must be recorded in a new custom object called Audit. Audit records need to be preserved for 10 years and only accessible by the audit team.
What relationship should be used to relate the Audit object to the Account object?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In this scenario, a Lookup relationship is the most appropriate choice for relating the Audit custom object to the Account object. This relationship allows for flexibility, especially when it comes to data retention and access control requirements, as outlined by AW Computing's security team.
* Lookup Relationship:
* A Lookup relationship links two objects, allowing records from the custom Audit object to be associated with the Account object. Unlike a Master-Detail relationship, it offers greater flexibility in terms of record ownership, sharing, and visibility controls, which is particularly useful for sensitive data.
* The Lookup relationship will enable administrators to set specific permissions, ensuring that only the audit team has access to the records, as required.
* Additionally, records in the Lookup relationship are independent. Therefore, if the Account record is deleted, the Audit record can persist, aligning with the need to retain Audit records for
10 years.
* Preservation and Access Control:
* Given the 10-year retention requirement, the independence of records under a Lookup relationship is ideal. It ensures that Audit records are not automatically deleted when an associated Account record is removed.
* Access to Audit records can be restricted to the audit team by setting up custom sharing rules or permissions, which is achievable through the Lookup relationship's flexible sharing model.
Incorrect options:
* Master-Detail: In a Master-Detail relationship, the detail (child) records are dependent on the master (parent) record. Deleting an Account would automatically delete any associated Audit records, which would conflict with the retention requirement.
* Many-To-Many: This type of relationship involves a junction object to associate multiple records from both sides. It is not necessary in this case, as the requirement is a one-to-many relationship from Account to Audit records.
* Self: A self-relationship would allow records within the Audit object to be related to each other. This does not apply to linking the Audit object to the Account object.
In conclusion, the Lookup relationship provides the necessary flexibility for data preservation and access control, making it the optimal choice for this requirement.
Reference: Salesforce documentation recommends using Lookup relationships when objects need to remain independent or when additional flexibility for sharing and retention is required.
NEW QUESTION # 72
When configuring a change set, which two practices should an administrator adhere to in order to ensure a successful deployment to production?
Choose 2 answers
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
Two practices that the administrator should adhere to in order to ensure a successful deployment to production are:
* Add permissions and access settings to outbound change sets in addition to the dependent component list. This can help avoid deployment errors or access issues caused by missing permissions or settings for the components in the change set. For example, if the change set includes a new custom object, the administrator should also include the object permissions, field-level security, page layouts, and record types for that object.
* Run deployment validations on the change set in the sandbox prior to uploading to production. This can help test the change set for any errors or conflicts before deploying it to production. Deployment validations simulate the deployment without actually making any changes and report any issues or warnings.
The other two options are incorrect because:
* Cloning a change set does not add forgotten dependent components to an uploaded change set. It only creates a copy of the existing change set that can be modified before uploading.
* When deploying a new record type, it is not necessary to have it as the only component in the change set. It can be deployed along with other components as long as they are compatible and have the required dependencies.
References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.change_sets_components.htm&type=5
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.change_sets_deploy.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s
/articleView?id=sf.change_sets_validate.htm&type=5
NEW QUESTION # 73
......
We all know that pass the Plat-Admn-301 exam will bring us many benefits, but it is not easy for every candidate to achieve it. The Plat-Admn-301 guide torrent is a tool that aimed to help every candidate to pass the exam. Our exam materials can installation and download set no limits for the amount of the computers and persons. We guarantee you that the Plat-Admn-301 Study Materials we provide to you are useful and can help you pass the test. Once you buy the product you can use the convenient method to learn the Plat-Admn-301 exam torrent at any time and place.
Plat-Admn-301 Reliable Test Pattern: https://www.trainingquiz.com/Plat-Admn-301-practice-quiz.html
P.S. Free & New Plat-Admn-301 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingQuiz: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AihVSO04W1k3J5moTIw0FXIDBA0oVy94