P.S. Free & New JN0-352 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Pass4guide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oAcOMunnXAl80L2Ybk4Ywlykp4WUfNEo
Our JN0-352 practice test software contains multiple learning tools that will help you pass the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) in the first attempt. We provide actual JN0-352 questions pdf dumps also for quick practice. Our JN0-352 vce products are easy to use, and you can simply turn things around by going through all the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) exam material to ensure your success in the exam. Our JN0-352 Pdf Dumps will help you prepare for the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) even when you are at work.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| High Availability | - Redundancy concepts in enterprise networks - VRRP configuration and behavior |
| Layer 2 Switching Technologies | - VLANs and trunking - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP/RSTP/MSTP) - Ethernet switching concepts |
| Routing Protocols | - BGP fundamentals and policy control - OSPF configuration and troubleshooting - IS-IS overview |
| Routing Policy and Filtering | - Route filtering and preference control - Policy statements |
| Network Services | - NAT concepts in Junos - Basic multicast concepts |
| Operations and Troubleshooting | - Junos CLI monitoring tools - Troubleshooting routing and switching issues |
>> Juniper JN0-352 Test Papers <<
Many candidates may take the price into consideration while buying JN0-352 exam materials. The price of JN0-352 exam materials is quite reasonable, you can afford it no matter you are students or the employees in the company. Furthermore the JN0-352 Exam Materials is high-quality, so that it can help you to pass the exam just one time, we will never let your money gets nothing returns. If you indeed fail the exam, money back will be guaranteed.
NEW QUESTION # 37
Which two statements are correct about BGP local preference? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Local preference is a well-known, discretionary BGP path attribute carried exclusively in IBGP UPDATE messages, and Junos assigns every route a local preference value of 100 by default whenever a route is received without an explicit LOCAL_PREF value already attached, or when the attribute has not been otherwise modified through routing policy. This default of 100 becomes the implicit baseline against which any administrator-configured local preference adjustments are compared. Because higher local preference values are always preferred over lower ones during BGP best-path selection -- and this evaluation happens before AS path length, origin, or MED are ever considered -- network engineers commonly use local preference specifically to steer outbound traffic leaving the autonomous system toward a preferred exit peer or upstream provider, by assigning a higher local preference to routes learned from that preferred peer relative to routes learned from alternative peers, making the third statement correct as well. Local preference is explicitly excluded from advertisement to EBGP peers under the BGP specification; it is meaningful only within the boundaries of a single AS and is stripped before a route crosses an AS boundary outward, since a neighboring AS has no reason to trust or honor another organization's internal preference values. A local preference of 0 does not have any special 'drop' semantics in BGP -- it is simply the lowest possible numeric preference value and is treated like any other value during comparison, not as a discard instruction.
NEW QUESTION # 38
Which two elements are used to create the STP bridge ID? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,D
NEW QUESTION # 39
You are establishing a new BGP session to an EBGP peer using loopback addresses. In addition to your general EBGP settings, which BGP feature must be enabled for this session to establish?
Answer: B
Explanation:
By default, EBGP sessions are built with the expectation that peers are directly connected at Layer 3, and Junos enforces this by sending EBGP packets with a TTL of 1. When loopback addresses are used as the session endpoints instead of the directly connected physical interface addresses, the resulting IP packets must traverse at least one additional router hop between the two loopbacks, and a TTL of 1 will expire in transit before reaching the remote loopback, causing the TCP handshake -- and therefore the BGP session -- to fail even though a valid route to the peer's loopback exists. The multihop statement (configured as an EBGP multihop parameter with an accompanying TTL value, most commonly set to 2 for a single intermediate hop) instructs Junos to increase the TTL used for that peer's BGP packets so they survive the extra hop count between loopbacks. This is a mandatory addition any time an EBGP session is deliberately built against non-directly-connected addresses, whereas IBGP sessions, by contrast, do not have this default restriction because IBGP already assumes peers may be multiple hops apart within the same AS. Multipath affects load-balancing across equal-cost paths, damping suppresses flapping routes, and passive controls whether a router waits for the remote peer to initiate the TCP connection -- none of these resolve the TTL expiration problem inherent to loopback-based EBGP peering.
NEW QUESTION # 40 
Click the Exhibit button.
You are troubleshooting an aggregated Ethernet interface on a Juniper Networks EX Series Switch. The aggregated Ethernet interface does not appear in the output shown in the exhibit.
Which action will solve this problem?
Answer: D
Explanation:
On EX Series switches, aggregated Ethernet (ae) interfaces do not exist by default; before any ae interface can be created, referenced, or brought into service, an administrator must first reserve the desired number of aggregated Ethernet device slots by configuring set chassis aggregated-devices ethernet device-count number at the [edit chassis] hierarchy. This statement allocates the internal resources needed for that many ae interfaces to exist as valid, configurable objects; until it is committed, any interface-level configuration referencing ae0 (such as the aggregated-ether-options and family ethernet-switching stanzas shown in the exhibit) is accepted syntactically by the CLI but never actually instantiates a live ae0 device, which is exactly why show interfaces ae0.0 returns 'device ae0 not found' despite the interface appearing fully configured.
Increasing the device-count to at least 1 (or higher, to cover the number of LAG bundles planned) immediately resolves this and allows ae0 to appear as an operational interface once its member links are also associated with it. This is a foundational and frequently overlooked prerequisite step in LAG deployment on Juniper switches. There is no separate licensing requirement for aggregated Ethernet functionality on EX Series switches, a reboot is not needed since the chassis statement takes effect upon commit, and the LACP mode (active versus passive) is unrelated to whether the ae interface object itself exists in the first place.
Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Switching - Link Aggregation, Configuring the Aggregated Ethernet Device Count.
NEW QUESTION # 41
Referring to the exhibit, what will be the IS-IS adjacency result of the configurations?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 42
......
It can be said that our JN0-352 study materials are the most powerful in the market at present, not only because our company is leader of other companies, but also because we have loyal users. JN0-352 study materials are not only the domestic market, but also the international high-end market. We are studying some learning models suitable for high-end users. Our research materials have many advantages. Now, I will briefly introduce some details about our JN0-352 Study Materials for your reference.
JN0-352 Latest Test Labs: https://www.pass4guide.com/JN0-352-exam-guide-torrent.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Pass4guide JN0-352 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oAcOMunnXAl80L2Ybk4Ywlykp4WUfNEo