SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Real Exam Preparation Materials | SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Prep - VCETorrent

All these three SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam question formats contain the real, updated, and error-free SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam practice test. These Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions give you an idea about the final Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam questions formats, exam question structures, and best possible answers, and you will also enhance your exam time management skills. Finally, at the end of Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Practice test you will be ready to pass the final Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam easily. Best of luck in Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam and professional career!!!

Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Weight	Objectives
Topic 1: SRAN Performance Optimization Fundamentals	25%	- Key performance indicators (KPIs) definition and measurement - Network performance monitoring and analysis tools - Performance optimization principles and methodology
Topic 2: Coverage and Capacity Optimization	30%	- Capacity planning, load balancing and optimization - Interference analysis and mitigation techniques - Coverage analysis, tuning and optimization
Topic 3: Mobility and Handover Optimization	20%	- Inter-RAT mobility and optimization - Handover parameters and algorithms - Mobility robustness and optimization
Topic 4: Advanced Optimization and SON Features	10%	- Self-Organizing Networks (SON) use cases and optimization - Energy saving and advanced features
Topic 5: Quality of Service and Resource Management	15%	- Radio resource management and optimization - QoS parameters, scheduling and admission control

>> Latest SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Answers <<

ACE THE Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization EXAM BY CONSIDERING THE BEST PLATFORM

In the face of fierce competition, you should understand the importance of time. You must walk in front of the competitors. If you have more strength, you will get more opportunities. Your dream life can really become a reality! SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning materials are here, right to choose! And you will find that you will get benefited from SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Braindumps far beyond you can image. Not only you can get more professional knowledage but also you can get the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification to find a better career.

Nokia MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 Sample Questions (Q10-Q15):

NEW QUESTION # 10
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?

A. Building penetration losses at mmWave frequencies can prevent practical outdoor-to-indoor coverage solutions.
B. Foliage and vegetation attenuation is high.
C. Water absorption is low at high frequencies.
D. Diffraction loss increases with frequency.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.

NEW QUESTION # 11
What is the role of admission control in 5G networks ?

A. To check whether there are enough resources for new connections
B. To increase the spectral efficiency
C. To manage the modulation schemes
D. To optimize the downlink throughput

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 12
Which of the following statements about CBRA , or contention-based random access , is correct?

A. If there is no existing connection between the UE and the RAN, the UE autonomously selects a preamble from the provided range and starts the access procedure.
B. If the RACH preamble is not particularly robustly coded, there is a risk that random noise combines into something that the BTS receiver interprets as a valid preamble.
C. If the RACH procedure fails for an NSA UE, it reports the failure to the eNB via the 4G RRC connection, and the eNB informs the gNB via the X2 connection.
D. If there is already an existing connection, the gNB can instruct the UE to use a specific, dedicated preamble. Therefore, there is no risk of preamble collision, and contention resolution is not needed.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In contention-based random access , the UE chooses a random access preamble by itself from a configured pool of available contention-based preambles. This is typically used when the UE does not yet have a dedicated connection or when the network has not assigned a dedicated preamble.
Because multiple UEs may choose the same preamble at the same time, preamble collision is possible . That is why CBRA requires a contention resolution step.
Option C describes contention-free random access , not CBRA. In contention-free random access, the network assigns a dedicated preamble to the UE, so collision risk is avoided and contention resolution is not required.
Option A is not the correct CBRA principle being tested. RACH false detection can be a receiver/design issue, but it does not define the CBRA procedure.
Option D describes a possible NSA signaling behavior around access failure handling, but it is not the core correct definition of CBRA.
Therefore, the correct CBRA statement is:
The UE autonomously selects a preamble from the configured range and starts the random access procedure.

NEW QUESTION # 13
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.

A. Distributed SON implementations provide better optimization benefits.
B. Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
C. Distributed SON implementations are more effective in handling multi-vendor networks.
D. Centralized PCI optimization offers less visibility into network configuration.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.

NEW QUESTION # 14
Which parameter defines the PRACH format ?

A. totalNumberOfRAPreambles
B. msg1-FrequencyStart
C. prachRootSequenceIndex
D. prachConfigurationIndex

Answer: D

Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
The prachConfigurationIndex defines the PRACH configuration, including the PRACH time-domain occasions and the associated PRACH format according to the PRACH configuration tables. In 5G NR, PRACH configuration is based on 3GPP-defined PRACH tables, where the configuration index maps to the PRACH format and PRACH occasion structure.
The other options have different meanings:
A). msg1-FrequencyStart defines the frequency-domain starting position of PRACH occasion resources.
C). prachRootSequenceIndex defines the root sequence used for PRACH preamble generation.
D). totalNumberOfRAPreambles defines how many random access preambles are available.
Therefore, the parameter that defines the PRACH format is:
prachConfigurationIndex.

NEW QUESTION # 15
......

In order to provide the most effective SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam materials which cover all of the current events for our customers, a group of experts in our company always keep an close eye on the changes of the SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam even the smallest one, and then will compile all of the new key points as well as the latest types of exam questions into the new version of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Practice Test, and you can get the latest version of our study materials for free during the whole year. Do not lose the wonderful chance to advance with times.

SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Valid Exam Prep: https://www.vcetorrent.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-valid-vce-torrent.html