人々は異なる目標がありますが、我々はあなたにRelativityのRCA試験に合格させるという同じ目標があります。この目標を達成するのは、あなたにとってIT分野での第一歩だけですが、我々のRelativityのRCAソフトを開発するすべての意義です。だから、我々は尽力して我々の問題集を多くしてJPNTestの専門かたちに研究させてあなたの合格する可能性を増大します。あなたの利用するRelativityのRCAソフトが最新版のを保証するために、一年間の無料更新を提供します。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Search and Analytics | - Search functionality
|
| System Administration | - Application management
|
| Workspace Administration | - Workspace creation and configuration
|
| Review and Production | - Document review workflows
|
| Data Management | - Object and metadata management
|
JPNTestのRCAクイズトレントに関するどんな問題やコンサルタントでも、1日を通して効率的なオンラインサービスを提供できます。 遅かれ早かれあなたがそれらを克服するのを助ける努力をspareしみません。 まず、RCAのRelativity Certified Administrator試験トレント資料を毎日チェックして更新する専門スタッフがいるため、いつでもRCA試験トレントから最新情報を入手できます。 アフターサービスのほかに、エンジニアは常にオンラインで、必要に応じてRelativityのRCAの学習質問に関するリモートガイダンスと支援を提供します。
質問 # 34
Which action requires a saved search?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is D. Building a search terms report. Relativity's Search Terms Report documentation requires you to define report information including a Searchable Set, which is a saved search containing the documents to be evaluated by the STR. Relativity's guidance for using STRs also states that you should define a saved search that returns the required document population for the searchable set. That makes a saved search a required component of building a search terms report.
The other options do not inherently require a saved search. A keyword search can be run directly in the search panel. A dashboard can be created without requiring a saved search as its core prerequisite. A persistent highlight set is commonly used with STR output, but the question asks which action itself requires a saved search, and the STR workflow is the one explicitly documented to require one. Therefore, the correct answer is Building a search terms report.
質問 # 35
What is the recommended workflow for exporting produced PDFs with a corresponding load file?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is C. Export the production set as PDFs using Import/Export. Relativity's official Import/Export documentation states that Import/Export is the recommended method for importing and exporting data for RelativityOne , and the production export workflow specifically supports exporting a production set load file with production files. The production export workflow is the documented method for exporting production sets and their associated deliverables in a structured, transferable form.
This makes it the best fit for the question's requirement: produced PDFs with a corresponding load file .
The PDF mass action is a separate document-level utility for creating PDFs from documents, natives, images, or produced documents, but it is not the standard production export workflow for packaging a production with its corresponding load file. Downloading PDFs from the Viewer is a manual review action, not a formal production export workflow. ROSE is used for large-scale data transfer to and from RelativityOne storage, but the product documentation positions Import/Export as the recommended export mechanism for production sets and related load files.
So, from a Productions and RCA workflow perspective, the recommended method is to export the production set as PDFs using Import/Export .
質問 # 36
With email thread visualization ETV, under what conditions does the red exclamation point indicate coding mismatch?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is C. The email and other parent emails in the thread are coded differently. Relativity' s Email thread visualization documentation explains the meaning of the visual warning icons used in the thread display. The red exclamation point is associated with a coding mismatch condition in the thread. In practice, this means related parent emails in the thread have been coded inconsistently, which is exactly the kind of review inconsistency ETV is designed to expose.
This is different from missing attachments, duplicate spare comparison, or a generic "Needs Review" state.
ETV is focused on surfacing thread relationships, inclusiveness, missing emails, and coding consistency across the email conversation. From a Structured Analytics standpoint, the red exclamation point is a QC indicator that reviewers should inspect the thread because coding decisions across parent emails do not align.
Therefore, the correct answer is C .
質問 # 37
A reviewer updated the coding decision on a document from null to Responsive on the single choice Responsive Designation field. You later discover this coding decision was incorrect. You attempt to use Audit to revert the coding decision, but find you are unable to revert. Why might this be?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is C. You cannot use Audit to revert coding decisions on required fields back to a null state. Relativity's official Audit documentation states that certain field types, including single choice , can be reverted. However, it also explicitly states that you cannot revert a required field if doing so would return that field to a blank null value . That is exactly what this scenario describes: the field was changed from null to Responsive, and reverting would restore it to null. If the field is required, Relativity blocks that revert because required fields cannot be blank.
This means option A is incorrect because single-choice fields can be reverted in Audit. Option B is also incorrect because Relativity supports both individual and mass revert workflows depending on the situation.
Option D is not the documented reason for the failure. The controlling issue is the required-field constraint.
From an RCA perspective, this is a subtle but important administrative behavior: the Audit system can revert field changes, but only where the resulting value remains valid under Relativity's field rules. If the revert would violate a field's required setting, the system will not allow it. Therefore, the most accurate reason is that Audit cannot revert the value because the revert would place a required field back into a null state .
質問 # 38
After imaging the documents in preparation for production, the case team asks for the estimated image count of the production. How can you quickly obtain the image count for the case team?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is D. Use the Tally/Sum/Average mass operation on the Relativity Image Count field.
Relativity's Tally/sum/average documentation says this mass operation is commonly used to determine the number of pages in a print job or production. Relativity also specifically documents, in related guidance, that to estimate project size you can use Tally/sum/average on the Relativity Image Count field.
This makes it the fastest and most direct built-in method for obtaining an image count estimate. The other options are less efficient or are not the documented workflow for quickly producing a total image count.
Therefore, the correct answer is to use Tally/Sum/Average on the Relativity Image Count field.
質問 # 39
......
どうしてJPNTestのRelativityのRCA試験トレーニング資料はほかのトレーニング資料よりはるかに人気があるのでしょうか。それはいくつかの理由があります。第一、JPNTestは受験生の要求をよく知っています。しかも、他のどのサイトよりも良いサービスを提供します。第二、専心すること。我々が決まったことを完璧に作るためにすべての不要な機会を諦めなければなりません。第三、我々は確かに最高の製品を持っていますが、粗悪品の方式で表示されたら、もちろん粗悪品と見られますから、我々は自分の製品を創造的かつプロの方法で見せます。JPNTestのRelativityのRCA試験トレーニング資料はこんなに成功するトレーニングですから、JPNTestを選ばない理由はないです。
RCA日本語版対応参考書: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/RCA-mondaishu