2026 Latest ExamsLabs ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF Dumps and ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PkfAn3gOiyGbkT8phb7ou73iehDpLpKQ
ExamsLabs is a convenient website to provide training resources for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor professionals to participate in the certification exam. ExamsLabs have different training methods and training courses for different candidates. With these ExamsLabs's targeted training, the candidates can pass the exam much easier. A lot of people who participate in the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor professional certification exam was to use ExamsLabs's practice questions and answers to pass the exam, so ExamsLabs got a high reputation in the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor industry.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is an essential qualification for professionals who are looking to advance their careers in the field of information security management. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam is beneficial for individuals who wish to take on roles such as ISMS auditor, compliance officer, security manager, or information security consultant. Obtaining the certification demonstrates to employers and clients that the individual possesses the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and audit ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 standard requirements.
The ISO/IEC 27001 standard is an internationally recognized framework that provides a systematic approach to managing and protecting sensitive information. The standard outlines best practices for implementing an ISMS, which is a set of policies, procedures, and processes that manage information risks, ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information. The ISO/IEC 27001 lead auditor certification validates a professional's ability to audit and assess an organization's ISMS based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard.
>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Reliable Study Questions <<
Almost everyone is trying to get PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) certification to update their CV or get the desired job. Nowadays, everyone is interested in taking the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam because it has multiple benefits for the future. Every candidate faces just one problem, and that is not getting updated PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) practice questions.
By obtaining the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification, individuals demonstrate their competence in conducting information security management system audits according to the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is highly valued by employers and can lead to career advancement opportunities.
NEW QUESTION # 74
To verify conformity to control 8.15 Logging of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A, the audit team verified a sample of server logs to determine if they can be edited or deleted. Which audit procedure was used?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The audit procedure used here is "analysis." The audit team analyzed server logs to verify if they can be edited or deleted, focusing on evaluating the logs' properties and the controls over their manipulation to ensure they comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 75
Objectives, criteria, and scope are critical features of a third-party ISMS audit. Which two issues are audit objectives?
* Evaluate customer processes and functions
Answer: A,E
Explanation:
Audit objectives are the specific purposes or goals that the customer or the certification body wants to achieve through the audit. They define what the audit intends to accomplish and provide the basis for planning and conducting the audit. Audit objectives may vary depending on the type, scope, and criteria of the audit, but they should be clear, measurable, and achievable.
Some examples of audit objectives for a third-party ISMS audit are:
* Assess conformity with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements: This objective means that the audit aims to verify that the organisation's ISMS meets the requirements of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, which specifies the best practices for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an information security management system. The audit will evaluate the organisation's ISMS documentation, processes, controls, and performance against the standard's clauses and annex A controls.
* Confirm sites operating the ISMS: This objective means that the audit aims to confirm that the organisation's ISMS covers all the relevant sites or locations where the organisation operates or provides its services. The audit will verify that the scope of the ISMS is accurate and consistent with the organisation's context, objectives, and risks.
The other phrases are not audit objectives, but rather:
* Evaluate customer processes and functions: This is not an audit objective, but rather a possible audit criterion or a requirement that the organisation's processes and functions should meet. The audit criterion is the reference against which the audit evidence is compared to determine conformity or nonconformity. The audit criterion may include ISO/IEC 27001 requirements, customer requirements, or other applicable standards or regulations.
* Fulfil the audit plan: This is not an audit objective, but rather a task or an activity that the auditor performs during the audit. The audit plan is a document that describes the arrangements and details of the audit, such as the objectives, scope, criteria, schedule, roles, and responsibilities. The auditor should follow and fulfil the audit plan to ensure that the audit is conducted effectively and efficiently.
* Determine the scope of the ISMS: This is not an audit objective, but rather a prerequisite or an input for conducting the audit. The scope of the ISMS is the extent and boundaries of the information security management system within the organisation. It defines what processes, activities, locations, assets, and stakeholders are included or excluded from the ISMS. The scope of the ISMS should be determined by the organisation before applying for certification or undergoing an audit.
* Review organisation efficiency: This is not an audit objective, but rather a possible outcome or a result of conducting an audit. The organisation efficiency is a measure of how well the organisation uses its resources to achieve its goals and objectives. The audit may help review and improve the organisation efficiency by identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in its information security management system.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) objectives and content from Quality.org and PECB ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems [Section 5.3.1]
NEW QUESTION # 76
Changes on project-managed applications or database should undergo the change control process as documented.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 77
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify that the Statement of Applicability (SoA) contains the necessary controls.
You review the latest SoA (version 5) document, sampling the access control to the source code (A.8.4), and want to know how the organisation secures ABC's healthcare mobile app source code received from an outsourced software developer.
The IT Security Manager explains the received source code will be checked into the SCM system to make sure of its integrity and security. Only authorised users will be able to check out the software to update it. Both check-in and check-out activities will be logged by the system automatically. The version control is managed by the system automatically.
You found a total of 10 user accounts on the SCM. All of them are from the IT department. You further check with the Human Resource manager and confirm that one of the users, Scott, resigned 9 months ago. The SCM System Administrator confirmed Scott's last check-out of the source code was found 1 month ago. He was using one of the authorised desktops from the local network in a secure area.
You check the user de-registration procedure which states "Managers have to make sure of deregistration of the user account and authorisation immediately from the relevant ICT system and/or equipment after resignation approval." There was no deregistration record for user Scott.
The IT Security Manager explains that Scott is a very good software engineer, an ex-colleague, and a friend.
He still comes back to the office every month after he resigned to provide support on source code maintenance. That's why his account on SCM still exists. "We know Scott well and he passed all our background checks when he joined us. As such we didn't feel it necessary to agree any further information security requirements with him just because he is now an external provider".
You prepare the audit findings. Select the three correct options.
Answer: A,E,F
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct options are:
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation's access control arrangements are not operating effectively as an individual who is no longer employed by the organisation is being permitted to access the nursing home's ICT systems. This does not conform with control A.5.15. (B): This option is correct because control A.5.15 requires the organization to implement secure log-on procedures and manage user access rights. The organization should ensure that only authorized users can access the ICT systems and that the access rights are revoked or modified when the user status changes. The fact that Scott, who resigned 9 months ago, still has an active account on the SCM and can check out the source code, indicates a failure of the access control arrangements and a nonconformity with the control A.5.15.
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Security manager did not make sure the user account for Scott was removed from the SCM and did not complete the user deregistration process after the resignation. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.5.15. : This option is correct because clause 9.1 requires the organization to monitor, measure, analyze, and evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS. The organization should have processes and indicators to verify that the ISMS requirements and objectives are met and that the ISMS is continually improved. The organization should also ensure that the results of the monitoring and measurement are documented and communicated. The fact that the IT Security manager did not follow the user de-registration procedure and did not document or communicate the exception for Scott, indicates a failure of the monitoring and measurement processes and a nonconformity with clause 9.1 and control A.5.15.
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation has failed to identify the security risks associated with leaving Scott's account open when he was only re-engaged for a short period monthly. This does not conform with clause 8.2. (F): This option is correct because clause 8.2 requires the organization to establish and maintain an information security risk management process. The
* organization should identify the information security risks, analyze and evaluate the risks, and treat the risks according to the risk criteria and the risk treatment options. The organization should also monitor and review the risks and the risk treatment plan periodically and document the results. The fact that the organization did not identify the security risks associated with Scott's access to the SCM and the source code, such as unauthorized disclosure, modification, or deletion of the information, indicates a failure of the risk management process and a nonconformity with clause 8.2.
NEW QUESTION # 78
Scenario 5
CyberShielding Systems Inc. provides security services spanning the entire information technology infrastructure. It provides cybersecurity software, including endpoint security, firewalls, and antivirus software. CyberShielding Systems Inc. has helped various companies secure their networks for two decades through advanced products and services. Having achieved a reputation in the information and network security sector, CyberShielding Systems Inc. decided to implement a security information management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 and obtain a certification to better secure its internal and customer assets and gain a competitive advantage.
The certification body initiated the process by selecting the audit team for CyberShielding Systems Inc.'s ISO
/IEC 27001 certification. They provided the company with the name and background information of each audit member. However, upon review, CyberShielding Systems Inc. discovered that one of the auditors did not hold the security clearance required by them. Consequently, the company objected to the appointment of this auditor. Upon review, the certification body replaced the auditor in response to CyberShielding Systems Inc.'s objection.
As part of the audit process, CyberShielding Systems Inc.'s approach to risk and opportunity determination was assessed as a standalone activity. This involved examining the organization's methods for identifying and managing risks and opportunities. The audit team's core objectives encompassed providing assurance on the effectiveness of CyberShielding Systems Inc.'s risk and opportunity identification mechanisms and reviewing the organization's strategies for addressing these determined risks and opportunities. During this, the audit team also identified a risk due to a lack of oversight in the firewall configuration review process, where changes were implemented without proper approval, potentially exposing the company to vulnerabilities. This finding highlighted the need for stronger internal controls to prevent such issues.
The audit team accessed process descriptions and organizational charts to understand the main business processes and controls. They performed a limited analysis of the IT risks and controls because their access to the IT infrastructure and applications was limited by third-party service provider restrictions. However, the audit team stated that the risk of a significant defect occurring in CyberShielding's ISMS was low since most of the company's processes were automated. They therefore evaluated that the ISMS, as a whole, conforms to the standard requirements by questioning CyberShielding representatives on IT responsibilities, control effectiveness, and anti-malware measures. CyberShielding's representatives provided sufficient and appropriate evidence to address all these questions.
Despite the agreement signed before the audit, which outlined the audit scope, criteria, and objectives, the audit was primarily focused on assessing conformity with established criteria and ensuring compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements.
Question
What kind of audit risk did the audit team identify? Refer to Scenario 5.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The audit team identified control risk, making option B the correct answer. Control risk refers to the risk that an organization's internal controls will fail to prevent, detect, or correct a material issue or security weakness.
In the scenario, the audit team identified a lack of oversight in the firewall configuration review process, where changes were implemented without proper approval. This clearly indicates a weakness in internal control mechanisms.
Firewall configuration management is a key security control area. The absence of proper approval and review processes increases the likelihood that unauthorized or insecure changes could be introduced, exposing the organization to vulnerabilities. This does not represent inherent risk, which relates to risks arising naturally from the nature of the business or environment. Instead, it highlights a failure in the design or operation of controls intended to manage those risks.
Option C is incorrect because detection risk relates to the possibility that auditors fail to identify existing issues during the audit. In this case, the auditors successfully identified the weakness, so detection risk is not applicable. Option A is incorrect because the issue does not stem from the inherent nature of CyberShielding' s operations but from inadequate control oversight.
Therefore, the identified issue is best classified as control risk, as it reflects deficiencies in internal control effectiveness within the ISMS.
NEW QUESTION # 79
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Reference: https://www.examslabs.com/PECB/ISO-27001/best-ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamsLabs: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PkfAn3gOiyGbkT8phb7ou73iehDpLpKQ