何の努力と時間もなくてACDISのCCDS-O試験に合格するのは不可能です。しかし、我々JPTestKingチームは力を尽くしてあなたのACDISのCCDS-O試験を準備する圧力を減少して規範的な模擬問題と理解しやすい解答分析はあなたにACDISのCCDS-O試験に合格するコツを把握させます。試験に失敗したら、あなたのACDISのCCDS-O試験の成績書を提供して確認してから我々はすべての費用をあなたに払い戻します。JPTestKingはあなたの信頼を得る足ります。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
JPTestKingはACDISのCCDS-O認定試験に関する包括的な資料を提供します。当社のトレーニング資料は専門家が研究した最新の研究資料です。JPTestKingを利用したら、あなたはいつでも最新の問題集と解答を持つことができます。当社のトレーニングツールは定期的に更新しますから、常に変わっている試験の目標に従っています。実際には成功は遠くないです。JPTestKingが与えた道に沿って、あなたの成功への独自の道に行くことができるようになります
質問 # 15
A CDI specialist receives a call from a disgruntled provider regarding recent documentation queries. The provider claims to only have 15 minutes to see patients and does not have time for interruptions like this if it does not increase reimbursement. Which of the following is the BEST course of action to effectively facilitate communication?
正解：A
解説：
Effective outpatient CDI depends on provider engagement, efficient workflows, and respectful communication. When a provider is frustrated about time pressures, the most productive approach is to partner with them to reduce friction while preserving compliant documentation improvement. ACDIS outpatient CDI concepts emphasize collaboration and provider education-meeting the provider where they are, understanding their workflow constraints, and jointly designing a query process that is minimally disruptive (e.g., batching queries, aligning with clinic schedules, using prospective queries, leveraging templates, or routing through agreed channels). Option C directly addresses the root issue (workflow burden) and builds trust by seeking the provider's input and scheduling the discussion at their convenience. Option A is confrontational and frames CDI as a compliance demand rather than a clinical accuracy initiative. Option B is inappropriate because CDI cannot stop querying when clarification is needed for accurate documentation, coding, quality reporting, and risk adjustment. Option D escalates prematurely and damages relationships; escalation is typically reserved for persistent, unresolved non-responsiveness after collaborative efforts and leadership-supported education.
質問 # 16
HCC category assignment methodology is similar to which of the following?
正解：C
解説：
HCC category assignment is most similar to DRG diagnostic category logic because both methods take detailed diagnosis coding and map it into clinically meaningful groupings used for payment or performance methodologies. In CMS-HCC risk adjustment, ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes map to Condition Categories (HCCs) that represent disease groups with expected cost and complexity, and the model applies rules such as hierarchies (to avoid double-counting related conditions) and, in some cases, interactions (to recognize added impact when certain conditions coexist). DRGs similarly group diagnoses (and procedures in the inpatient setting) into a limited number of categories intended to reflect resource consumption and clinical similarity, rather than paying strictly on every individual code. By contrast, 835 is a remittance advice transaction standard (payment explanation) and has nothing to do with clinical grouping methodology. ICD-10-PCS and CPT are procedure/service coding systems; they describe interventions performed, not the risk-category grouping of diagnoses. Therefore, DRG diagnostic categories are the closest conceptual match to HCC assignment methodology.
質問 # 17
A patient is seen in the office for a persistent cough. Provider documentation states: "History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and hypertension. Hypertension treated with Enalapril. Cough an adverse effect of the ACE inhibitor; discontinue Enalapril. COPD stable. Instructed to continue meds for COPD/asthma." Which of the following diagnoses should be reported for this encounter?
正解：D
解説：
Outpatient diagnosis reporting requires coding conditions that are evaluated, assessed, treated, or that influence care/management at the encounter. The chief reason for the visit is the persistent cough, which is assessed and attributed to an adverse effect of an ACE inhibitor (enalapril). For outpatient coding of medication adverse effects, the documentation supports reporting both the manifestation (cough) and the adverse effect of the drug (ACE inhibitor adverse effect), because the provider identified the causal relationship and changed therapy by discontinuing enalapril. In addition, the provider addresses chronic conditions that are clinically relevant to the visit: COPD is assessed as "stable" and the patient is instructed to continue COPD/asthma medications, demonstrating ongoing management. Hypertension also remains relevant because medication therapy is adjusted due to the adverse effect; the patient still has HTN even though one agent is discontinued. Therefore, all five items-cough, ACE inhibitor adverse effect, COPD, asthma, and hypertension-are supported and should be reported, making option D the most appropriate.
質問 # 18
Provider documentation states: "A patient is seen today with DM type 2, peripheral neuropathy with diabetic ulcer of the left great toe, hypertension, and BMI 43. O2 dependent, chronic respiratory failure due to COPD, stopped smoking 2 years ago - 84 packs per year smoking habit." Which of the following query opportunities will impact risk adjustment?
正解：C
解説：
In ambulatory CDI, "risk adjustment impact" means the clarification can change whether an HCC-relevant condition is captured accurately (or captured at all) based on ICD-10-CM reporting rules. Here, "DM2 with peripheral neuropathy with diabetic ulcer" already establishes diabetes with complications, so querying option B adds little-complications are already documented. "Nicotine dependence" is not supported because the patient stopped smoking two years ago; at most, this supports a history of nicotine dependence, which generally does not drive HCC risk scoring. "Morbid obesity" may be clinically relevant (BMI 43 supports it), but obesity typically does not produce meaningful CMS-HCC risk adjustment impact compared with other chronic categories. The diabetic ulcer does matter: correct reporting requires an additional L97.- code that depends on ulcer severity/depth (skin breakdown, fat layer exposed, necrosis of muscle/bone). Clarifying depth supports accurate ulcer severity coding and can affect HCC capture/validation for chronic ulcer burden.
質問 # 19
Which of the following illustrates an example of a compliant, prospective query?
正解：B
解説：
A compliant prospective query is initiated before the next encounter so the provider can clarify documentation during the upcoming visit, using clinically relevant indicators without directing a specific diagnosis. Option A does this appropriately: it references an existing CHF history and a supportive medication (Lasix), then asks the provider to confirm whether CHF is pertinent at the next visit and, if so, to specify type and acuity. This supports accurate outpatient reporting because heart failure coding requires specificity (systolic/diastolic/combined; acute/chronic/acute on chronic) and should reflect what is actually evaluated/managed at the encounter. Option B is retrospective and attempts to justify a prior test. Option C is leading because it asks the provider to "add" a diagnosis to a past note rather than clarify current clinical status. Option D is also retrospective and uses "please add CHF," which is leading and can be perceived as prompting. Therefore, A best demonstrates a compliant prospective query.
質問 # 20
......
IT業界の中でたくさんの野心的な専門家がいって、IT業界の中でより一層頂上まで一歩更に近く立ちたくてACDISのCCDS-O試験に参加して認可を得たくて、ACDIS のCCDS-O試験が難度の高いので合格率も比較的低いです。ACDISのCCDS-O試験を申し込むのは賢明な選択で今のは競争の激しいIT業界では、絶えず自分を高めるべきです。しかし多くの選択肢があるので君はきっと悩んでいましょう。
CCDS-O復習内容: https://www.jptestking.com/CCDS-O-exam.html