Integration-Architect問題数、Integration-Architectテスト難易度

2026年Tech4Examの最新Integration-Architect PDFダンプおよびIntegration-Architect試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m5MxA5V2RYSpdDdZQO0mddmO4fkK88PK

SalesforceのIntegration-Architect認定試験を除いて、最近非常に人気がある試験はまたSalesforce、Cisco、IBM、SAPなどの様々な認定試験があります。しかし、もしIntegration-Architect認証資格を取りたいなら、Tech4ExamのIntegration-Architect問題集はあなたを願望を達成させることができます。試験の受験に自信を持たないので諦めることをしないでください。Tech4Examの試験参考書を利用することを通して自分の目標を達成することができますから。Integration-Architect認証資格を入手してから、他のIT認定試験を受験することもできます。Tech4Examの試験問題集を手にすると、どのような試験でも問題ではありません。

Salesforce Integration-Architect Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Weight	Objectives
Integration Solutions Use Cases and Design	31%	- Design integration solutions using APIs 1. Bulk API 2. Tooling API 3. Metadata API 4. Streaming API 5. SOAP API 6. REST API - Design integration solutions using middleware 1. External Services 2. Canvas Apps 3. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - Design integration solutions using Salesforce features 1. Apex (Callouts, @future, Batch Apex) 2. Flows and Process Builder 3. Outbound Messaging 4. Salesforce Connect (OData)
Secure Integration and Data Integration	25%	- Design data integration solutions 1. Data mapping and transformation 2. Error handling and retry mechanisms 3. Data deduplication strategies - Implement secure integration solutions 1. Named Credentials 2. OAuth 2.0 (Web Server Flow, User Agent Flow, JWT Flow) 3. Connected Apps 4. Certificate-based authentication
Integration Patterns and Strategy	20%	- Given a scenario, identify the integration requirements 1. Determine data volume and frequency 2. Identify required security mechanisms 3. Determine synchronous vs. asynchronous requirements - Identify the appropriate integration pattern needed for a given scenario 1. Data Integration (Batch and Real-time) 2. Remote Process Integration (Request and Response) 3. UI Update on Screen (Whole Page Refresh vs. Partial) 4. Remote Process Integration (Fire and Forget)
Integration Architecture	24%	- Design a scalable integration architecture 1. Load balancing considerations 2. Caching strategies 3. API governor limits and best practices 4. Volume considerations - Integration governance and monitoring 1. Platform Event usage and design 2. Monitoring and logging integration points 3. Change Data Capture

>> Integration-Architect問題数 <<

信頼できるIntegration-Architect問題数 & 合格スムーズIntegration-Architectテスト難易度 | 一生懸命にIntegration-Architect専門トレーリング

Integration-Architect準備ガイドを使用して、最高の証明書学習体験をお楽しみください。まず、5〜10分でお支払い後、短納期でお届けします。オンラインでIntegration-Architectガイドトレントをお送りします。つまり、時間の無駄を避けるためにすぐに勉強することができます。加えて、当社のIntegration-Architect試験トレントの使用中に技術的および運用上の問題に対処するのに問題がある場合は、すぐにご連絡ください。

Salesforce Certified Integration Architect 認定 Integration-Architect 試験問題 (Q84-Q89):

質問 # 84
A developer has been tasked by the integration architect to build a solution based on the Streaming API. The developer has done some research and has found there are different implementations of the events in Salesforce (PushTopic Events, Change Data Capture, Generic Streaming, Platform Events), but is unsure of how to proceed with the implementation and asks the system architect for some guidance.
What should the architect consider when making the recommendation?

A. Change Data Capture can be published from Apex.
B. PushTopic Events can define a custom payload.
C. Change Data Capture does not have record access support.

正解：C

質問 # 85
An enterprise architect has requested the Salesforce integration architect to review the following (see diagram and description) and provide recommendations after carefully considering all constraints of the enterprise systems and Salesforce Platform limits.
* About 3,000 phone sales agents use a Salesforce Lightning user interface (UI) concurrently to check eligibility of a customer for a qualifying offer.
* There are multiple eligibility systems that provide this service and are hosted externally.
* Their current response times could take up to 90 seconds to process and return.
* These eligibility systems are accessed through APIs orchestrated via ESB (MuleSoft).
* All requests from Salesforce traverse the customer's API Gateway layer, which imposes a timeout constraint of 9 seconds.

Which recommendation should the integration architect make?

A. Implement a "Check Update" button that passes a requestID received from ESB (user action needed).
B. Create a platform event in Salesforce via Remote Call-In and use the empAPI in the Lightning UI to serve 3,000 concurrent users when responses are received by Mule.
C. Recommend synchronous Apex callouts from Lightning UI to External Systems via Mule and implement polling on an API Gat8eway timeout.

正解：B

解説：
In this architectural scenario, the Integration Architect must navigate two critical technical "bottlenecks": the
9-second API Gateway timeout and the 90-second backend processing time. Since the backend takes significantly longer than the gateway allows for a synchronous connection, a standard Request-Reply pattern will fail. Furthermore, having 3,000 concurrent agents perform synchronous callouts would risk hitting Salesforce's concurrent long-running request limits.
The most scalable and user-friendly solution is to implement an Asynchronous Request-Reply pattern using Platform Events and the empAPI.
When an agent clicks "Check Eligibility," Salesforce sends an initial asynchronous request to the ESB (MuleSoft). The ESB immediately acknowledges receipt with a 202 Accepted status, freeing up the Salesforce UI thread and avoiding the API Gateway's 9-second timeout. Once the backend eligibility system completes its 90-second process, MuleSoft acts as a client to Salesforce, performing a Remote Call-In to publish a specific Platform Event containing the result and the original Request ID.
On the frontend, the Lightning UI uses the empAPI (Enterprise Messaging Platform API) to subscribe to the streaming channel for that Platform Event. Because the empAPI uses CometD technology to maintain a single long-lived connection, it can efficiently push the response to the agent's screen the moment it arrives, without requiring the agent to manually refresh or click a "Check Update" button (as suggested in Option B).
This provides a "real-time" feel despite the long backend latency.
Option A is non-viable because synchronous polling would exacerbate the load on the API Gateway and likely lead to governance limit issues within Salesforce. By using Platform Events and empAPI, the architect ensures the solution remains within Salesforce's execution limits while providing a seamless, automated experience for a high-volume call center environment.

質問 # 86
An architect recommended using Apex code to make callouts to an external system to process insurance quote.
What should the integration architect consider to make sure this is the right option for the integration?

A. The maximum number of parallel Apex callouts in a single continuation.
B. The limit on long-running requests (total execution time).
C. The maximum callouts in a single Apex transaction.
D. The limit of pending operations in the same transaction.

正解：C

解説：
Explanation
The maximum callouts in a single Apex transaction is one of the factors that should be considered when choosing Apex code to make callouts to an external system. The limit is 100 callouts per transaction, and if this limit is exceeded, a LimitException is thrown. Therefore, the integration architect should evaluate the expected volume and frequency of the callouts and design the solution accordingly2 References: Salesforce API Limits and Usage

質問 # 87
Which two requirements should the Salesforce Community Cloud support for self-registration and SSO?
Choose 2 answers

A. SAML SSO and Registration Handler
B. OpenId Connect Authentication Provider and Registration Handler
C. OpenId Connect Authentication Provider and just-in-time provisioning
D. SAML SSO and just-in-time provisioning

正解：B、D

解説：
Explanation
OpenId Connect Authentication Provider and Registration Handler, and SAML SSO and just-in-time provisioning are two requirements that the Salesforce Community Cloud can support for self-registration and SSO. OpenId Connect is a protocol that allows users to authenticate with an external identity provider and access Salesforce resources. A registration handler is a class that implements the Auth.RegistrationHandler interface and defines the logic for creating or updating a user in Salesforce after authentication. SAML SSO is a protocol that allows users to log in to Salesforce with a single click, using an assertion from an identity provider that confirms the user's identity. Just-in-time provisioning is a feature that allows Salesforce to create or update a user account based on the information in the SAML assertion. References: Certification - Integration Architect - Trailhead, [OpenID Connect Authentication Providers], [SAML Single Sign-On (SSO) Service for Salesforce]

質問 # 88
A customer's enterprise architect has identified requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. The company has asked the Salesforce integration architect to help fulfill such aspects with their Salesforce program.
Which three recommendations should the Salesforce integration architect make?
Choose 3 answers

A. Event handling in a publish/subscribe scenario, the middleware can be used to route requests or messages to active data-event subscribers from active data-event publishers.
B. Provide true message queueing for integration scenarios (including orchestration, process choreography, quality of service, etc.) given that a middleware solution is required.
C. Event handling processes such as writing to a log, sending an error or recovery process, or sending an extra message, can be assumed to be handled by middleware.
D. Transform a fire-and-forget mechanism to request-reply should be handled by middleware tools (like ETL/ESB) to improve performance.
E. Message transformation and protocol translation should be done within Salesforce.Recommend leveraging Salesforce native protocol conversion capabilities as middleware tools are NOT suited for such tasks

正解：A、B、C

解説：
Explanation
The recommendations that the Salesforce integration architect should make to fulfill the requirements around caching, queuing, error handling, alerts, retries, event handling, etc. are based on the best practices and capabilities of the middleware tools. The recommendation B is valid because middleware tools can provide true message queueing for integration scenarios that require asynchronous processing, guaranteed delivery, load balancing, etc. The recommendation D is valid because middleware tools can handle various events that may occur during the integration process, such as logging errors, sending notifications, triggering recovery actions, etc. The recommendation E is valid because middleware tools can support the publish/subscribe pattern for event-driven integration, where the middleware can route messages from publishers to subscribers based on topics or filters. The recommendation A is not valid because transforming a fire-and-forget mechanism to request-reply does not improve performance, but rather increases the latency and complexity of the integration. The recommendation C is not valid because message transformation and protocol translation are tasks that are better suited for middleware tools than Salesforce, as they can handle different formats and protocols more efficiently and flexibly23
1: Integration Architecture Designer Resource Guide 2: Integration Patterns and Practices 3: Salesforce Integration Architecture Designer Certification Exam Guide

質問 # 89
......

テストSalesforceのIntegration-Architectの認定に合格すると、あなたの就労能力が社会からSalesforce認められ、良い仕事を見つけることができます。 Integration-Architectクイズトレントを習得して試験に合格した場合。同僚、上司、親、友人、社会から尊敬されます。総じて、Integration-Architectテスト準備を購入すると、試験に合格するだけでなく、キャリアと将来についての夢を実現するのに役立ちます。そのため、Integration-Architect試験の教材を購入してすぐに対策を講じることをheしないでください。

Integration-Architectテスト難易度: https://www.tech4exam.com/Integration-Architect-pass-shiken.html

2026年Tech4Examの最新Integration-Architect PDFダンプおよびIntegration-Architect試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m5MxA5V2RYSpdDdZQO0mddmO4fkK88PK