2026 Latest TestsDumps Plat-Admn-202 PDF Dumps and Plat-Admn-202 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QOm8Qbza2yPv16nbLKEpG-gwoohSxbUD
Three versions for Plat-Admn-202 exam materials are available, and you can choose the most suitable one according to your own needs. Plat-Admn-202 PDF version is printable, and if you like the hard one, you can print them into paper. Plat-Admn-202 Soft test engine supports MS operating system, and it can install in more than 200 computers, and if can also stimulate the real exam environment, so that you know the procedures for the exam. Plat-Admn-202 Online soft test engine is convenient and easy to learn, and it has testing history and performance review, and you can have a review what you have learnt.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder Exam |
| Exam Number: | CRT-403 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 1 year (maintenance required annually) |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 (multiple-choice / multiple-select) |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Administrator Salesforce Certified Platform Developer I |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Exam Price: | USD 200 |
| Passing Score: | 63% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice questions, Multiple-select questions |
| Available Languages: | Portuguese (Brazil), Spanish, Japanese, German, English, French |
| Recommended Training: | Salesforce Platform App Builder Certification Guide Salesforce Trailhead - Platform App Builder |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Registration Pearson VUE Exam Scheduling |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center (Pearson VUE) |
| Pre Condition: | No strict prerequisites, but Salesforce Administrator knowledge is strongly recommended. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/platformappbuilder |
>> Plat-Admn-202 Top Questions <<
Up to now, there are three versions of Plat-Admn-202 exam materials for your choice. So high-quality contents and flexible choices of Plat-Admn-202 learning mode will bring about the excellent learning experience for you. Though the content of these three versions of our Plat-Admn-202 study questions is the same, their displays are totally different. And you can be surprised to find that our Plat-Admn-202 learning quiz is developed with the latest technologies as well.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 104
Universal Containers utilizes opportunities and a custom object called Detailed_Sales_ The company would like to roll sales metrics up to an opportunity For only Detailed_Sales_c records that have their picklist status set to Active. What is the recommended method for the app builder to achieve this request?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Create a master-detail relationship between the parent and child object with a roll-up summary field that filters on the status field.
A roll-up summary field is the recommended declarative solution when Salesforce needs to summarize child-record data on a parent record. Salesforce documentation states that roll-up summary fields calculate values from related records and are defined on the master side of a master-detail relationship.
In this scenario, Opportunity is the parent and Detailed_Sales__c is the child. The roll-up summary field can summarize sales metrics and use filter criteria so only child records where Status = Active are included.
Why others are incorrect:
A is incorrect because a third-party AppExchange app is unnecessary when native roll-up summary functionality meets the requirement.
B is incorrect because Apex is not recommended when a declarative feature can solve the requirement.
D is incorrect because lookup relationships do not support standard roll-up summary fields. Salesforce documentation states that lookup relationships are similar to master-detail relationships, except they do not support roll-up summary fields.
NEW QUESTION # 105
A user is unable to use inline editing on a list view. A quick check verifies the user should be able to perform inline editing as they have been Assigned the appropriate permissions. Which condition should the app builder review?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The app builder should check whether the list view contains more than one record type.
Salesforce's inline editing considerations state that if a list view or multiline view contains more than one record type, it cannot be inline edited. To enable inline editing, the list view should be filtered to a single record type.
Why not the others? A locked list view, a chart, or sharing restrictions are not the standard documented reason in this scenario when permissions are already confirmed. Multiple record types in the same list view is the key limitation.
NEW QUESTION # 106
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has created the custom objects Trail and Park in Salesforce to track trails and parks respectively. NTO wants to track the total number of trails a park has on the park record without writing any code.
Which two actions should an app builder take to accomplish this requirement?
Choose 2 answers
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
To track the total number of trails associated with a park without writing code, the correct actions to take are:
Use a roll-up summary field on the Park record to show the total number of Trails (B). Roll-up summary fields calculate and display a value in a master record based on the values of fields in a detail record. They are used to count, sum, average, or get the minimum/maximum of values in related detail records.
Use a master-detail relationship between the Park and Trail objects (C). Master-detail relationships are necessary for roll-up summary fields as they allow the master object to control certain behaviors of the detail object and summarize data from those detail records.
A formula field (A) cannot dynamically count related records unless those records are linked via a master-detail relationship, and it cannot alone handle counts across related records without such a relationship. A lookup relationship (D) does not support roll-up summaries unless combined with additional tools like triggers or third-party apps, which involve coding or extra configuration outside standard object setup.
For more details, refer to the Salesforce Help documentation on master-detail relationships and roll-up summary fields:
Master-Detail Relationship: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=relationships_considerations.htm&type=5 Roll-Up Summary Fields: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=fields_about_roll_up_summary_fields.htm&type=5
NEW QUESTION # 107
Universal Containers (UC) wants to test code against a subset of production data that is under 5 GB Additionally, UC wants to refresh this sandbox every Weeken Which type of sandbox should be used to accomplish this?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct sandbox type is Partial Copy.
A Partial Copy sandbox is built for testing with a subset of production data. Salesforce lists Partial Copy sandboxes with 5 GB data storage and a 5-day refresh interval, which supports the requirement to refresh it every weekend.
Why the other options are wrong:
Developer and Developer Pro sandboxes are mainly for development and do not copy a production data subset in the same way. A Full sandbox can copy all production data, but its refresh interval is longer and it is unnecessary for a subset under 5 GB.
NEW QUESTION # 108
An app builder needs to create new automation on an object. Which best practice should the app builder follow when building out automation?
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question is testing the classic Salesforce Process Builder automation best practice, not a generic Flow-only rule. Salesforce's official process design guidance states that an org should have only one record-change process per object. The reason is simple: every time a record is created or updated, Salesforce evaluates the record-change processes for that object. If an object has multiple record-change processes, the automation becomes harder to predict, harder to troubleshoot, and more likely to hit governor limits. Salesforce specifically explains that consolidating automation into one record-change process gives admins a single view of all criteria and actions for that object, reduces duplicated automation overhead, and allows the app builder to control the order of criteria evaluation.
A is not the best exam answer here. In modern Flow architecture, "one Flow per object" is often discussed as a design pattern, but it is not the exact best-practice wording being tested by this Platform App Builder-style question. Salesforce Flow design is more nuanced today because record-triggered flows can vary by trigger timing and event. B is wrong because validation rules should be separated by validation requirement, not forced into one rule per object. C is wrong because invocable processes are reusable modular processes, not the main record-change automation container.
NEW QUESTION # 109
......
Braindumps Plat-Admn-202 Pdf: https://www.testsdumps.com/Plat-Admn-202_real-exam-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of TestsDumps Plat-Admn-202 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QOm8Qbza2yPv16nbLKEpG-gwoohSxbUD