2026年Tech4Examの最新PF1 PDFダンプおよびPF1試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Tkdf-NlY9P87g4E39KQ58EqGpPnhYnuG
Tech4Examは、試験に最適な試験PF1試験ガイドを提供します。 PF1練習トレントの有効性と信頼性は、専門家によって確認されています。多くのお客様が当社のヘルプでPF1試験に合格しています。 PF1テスト資料はホームページで更新され、PF1認定試験に関連する情報をタイムリーに更新します。最も有効で費用対効果の高いPF1準備資料を入手できるように、pdf塾でプロモーションを行います。そのため、PF1トレーニングガイドを安心してお選びいただけます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Pay Calculations | 40% | - Non-regular earnings
|
| Communication and Compliance | 10% | - Accuracy and documentation
|
| Record of Employment (ROE) | 20% | - ROE completion requirements
|
| Termination and Special Payments | 30% | - Termination payments
|
Tech4Examを選ぶかどうか状況があれば、弊社の無料なサンプルをダウンロードしてから、決めても大丈夫です。こうして、弊社の商品はどのくらいあなたの力になるのはよく分かっています。Tech4ExamはNational Payroll Institute PF1認証試験を助けって通じての最良の選択で、１００％のNational Payroll Institute PF1認証試験合格率のはTech4Exam最高の保証でございます。君が選んだのはTech4Exam、成功を選択したのに等しいです。
質問 # 12
The capital cost of an employer-owned vehicle includes:
正解：C
解説：
For CRA automobile benefit purposes (standby charge on an employer-owned automobile), the "cost" used is the capital cost, which includes more than just the sticker price. CRA guidance states the cost includes the trade-in amount (if applicable), additions, and GST/HST and PST as part of the cost base used in the standby charge calculation.
Option D is the best match because it includes vehicle options/accessories, sales taxes, and additions that add to depreciation value. Importantly, CRA also notes that certain specialized equipment added to meet the requirements of a disabled person or employment (examples include heavy-duty suspension and power winches) is not considered part of the automobile's cost for standby charge purposes. This directly rules out options A and C, since they treat specialized equipment as part of capital cost. Option B is incorrect because CRA includes sales taxes (GST/HST and PST) in the cost base.
質問 # 13
Paul Westin works for an Alberta organization and receives a regular salary of $1,800.00 semi-monthly. He will be receiving a payout of accrued vacation with no time taken of $1,400.00 on a separate cheque. He has federal and provincial TD1s on file with claim code 1. Calculate the income taxes to be withheld on his vacation pay.
正解：
解説：
341.50
Explanation:
CRA's method for bonus/irregular payments paid separately is to calculate income tax on the combined pay (regular pay + the irregular payment) using the regular tax tables, then subtract the tax that would apply to the regular pay alone. The difference is the income tax to withhold from the irregular payment.
Here, the semi-monthly taxable pay is:
Regular pay = $1,800.00
Regular + vacation payout = $3,200.00
Using the 2026 Alberta semi-monthly (24 pay periods) tax tables with claim code 1:
At $1,800, Federal tax = $130.45 and Alberta tax = $58.55 # Total = $189.00.
At $3,200, Federal tax = $356.50 and Alberta tax = $174.00 # Total = $530.50.
Income tax on the vacation payout = $530.50 # $189.00 = $341.50.
CPP (including the enhanced portion) is a separate statutory deduction that must also be calculated on the payout, but this question asked specifically for income tax withholding.
質問 # 14
An employee in Ontario was paid a $25,000.00 retiring allowance. The eligible portion was $15,000.00 and was transferred to the employee's Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) by the employer. Calculate the income tax on the non-eligible portion.
正解：B
解説：
A retiring allowance is treated as a lump-sum payment for payroll withholding purposes. When part of a retiring allowance is transferred directly to an RRSP/RPP, CRA guidance indicates you do not withhold income tax on the transferred amount (up to the employee's available limit), because it is not paid to the employee in cash.
Step 1: Determine the portion paid directly to the employee (non-eligible portion):
$25,000 # $15,000 transferred to RRSP = $10,000 paid/remaining.
Step 2: Apply CRA lump-sum withholding rates (outside Quebec):
For total lump-sum payments $5,001 to $15,000, the withholding rate is 20%.
Step 3: Calculate tax to withhold on $10,000:
$10,000 × 20% = $2,000.00.
So the correct option is B ($2,000.00).
質問 # 15
Elodie is paid her commissions together with her bi-weekly salary of $1,000.00. This pay period her commissions are $4,300.00. Calculate her Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) contribution for this pay period.
正解：
解説：
$325.42
Explanation:
Because Elodie is subject to QPP, her pensionable earnings for the pay period include both salary and commissions (both are pensionable employment earnings, assuming no exemptions apply). First, determine total pensionable earnings for the bi-weekly pay:
$1,000.00 + $4,300.00 = $5,300.00.
For 2026, Revenu Quebec shows the QPP basic exemption is $3,500 annually and the (employee) QPP contribution rate on earnings up to the maximum pensionable earnings is 6.30%.
Payroll applies the exemption per pay period. For bi-weekly pay (26 pay periods):
$3,500 ÷ 26 = $134.62 (rounded to cents).
Pensionable earnings subject to QPP this pay:
$5,300.00 # $134.62 = $5,165.38.
QPP contribution:
$5,165.38 × 6.30% = $5,165.38 × 0.063 = $325.41894, which rounds to $325.42.
質問 # 16
Rosa joined Avion Electronics in April 1983. Her employment was terminated on November 30, 2015 and she was paid a $62,500.00 retiring allowance. Rosa joined her company's pension plan in 1986 and was fully vested on termination of employment. Calculate the non-eligible portion of the retiring allowance.
正解：
解説：
$32,000.00 non-eligible portion
Explanation:
CRA requires separating a retiring allowance into an eligible and non-eligible portion. The eligible portion is the maximum that can be transferred to an RRSP/RPP under the special rules (without using regular RRSP room). The formula is: $2,000 for each year (or part-year) of service before 1996, plus an additional $1,500 for each year (or part-year) before 1989 in which the employee had no employer pension/DPSP benefit vested at the time of payment (or previously paid).
Rosa worked from 1983 to 1995 (inclusive) for pre-1996 service: 13 years × $2,000 = $26,000.
For the extra pre-1989 amount: she joined the pension plan in 1986 and was fully vested when paid the retiring allowance in 2015, so 1986-1988 do not qualify for the extra $1,500. However, 1983-1985 were years before 1989 when she had no vested employer pension benefit, so 3 years × $1,500 = $4,500.
Eligible portion = $26,000 + $4,500 = $30,500.
Non-eligible portion = $62,500 # $30,500 = $32,000.
質問 # 17
......
いろいろな人はNational Payroll InstituteのPF1を長い時間で復習して試験の模式への不適応で失敗することを心配していますから、我々Tech4Examはあなたに試験の前に試験の真実な模式を体験させます。National Payroll InstituteのPF1試験のソフトは問題数が豊富であなたに大量の練習で能力を高めさせます。そのほかに、専門家たちの解答への詳しい分析があります。あなたにNational Payroll InstituteのPF1試験に自信を持たせます。
PF1日本語pdf問題: https://www.tech4exam.com/PF1-pass-shiken.html
P.S. Tech4ExamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいPF1ダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Tkdf-NlY9P87g4E39KQ58EqGpPnhYnuG