ExamFragen wird Ihnen stets begleiten, bis Sie erfolgreich werden. Egal wie ehrgeizig Ihre Träume sind, werden wir ExamFragen Ihnen helfen, Ihre Träume Schritt für Schritt zu verwirklichen. Denn unsere Schulungsunterlagen zur Versa Networks VNX301 Zertifizierungsprüfung sind von erfahrenen IT-Experten durch ihre eigene ständige Untersuchungen und Erforschungen bearbeitet. Wenn Sie noch damit zögern, können Sie vorher einige kostenlosen Testaufgaben und Antworten auf der Webseite ExamFragen als Probe herunterladen. Wir sind sicher, dass Sie niemals enttäuscht werden.
| Certification Vendor: | Versa Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Versa Certified Administrator - SD-WAN Specialist |
| Exam Number: | VNX301 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Price: | $150 USD |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 |
| Related Certifications: | Versa Certified SD-WAN Associate (VNX100) |
| Exam Duration: | 90 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Passing Score: | Not officially published |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Select, Multiple Choice |
| Recommended Training: | Versa Secure SD-WAN Configuration and Administration Versa Advanced Services Training |
| Exam Registration: | Kryterion Testing Services Versa Academy Certification Page |
| Sample Questions: | Versa Networks VNX301 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center via Kryterion |
| Pre Condition: | Must hold Versa Certified SD-WAN Associate (VNX100); 1+ year hands-on experience recommended |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://academy.versa-networks.com/certification-vnx300 |
Wir ExamFragen bieten Ihnen die umfassendsten Versa Networks VNX301 Dumps mit sehr hoher Hit-Rate. Und alle Probleme, die vielleicht in aktuellen Prüfungen sind in Dumps vorhanden. Und wir aktualisieren unsere Dumps nach der Veränderung der Prüfungsinhalte. Es kann den sinnlosen Zeitaufwand vermeiden und Ihnen helfen, leichter und hocheffektiver die Versa Networks VNX301 Prüfung zu bestehen. Obwohl Sie dieVersa Networks VNX301 Prüfung nicht bestehen, geben wir Ihnen voll Geld zurück. Deshalb können Sie keinen Verlust haben. Die Chance ist für die Leute, die gut bereit sind. Wir hoffen, dass Sie keine gut Chance verlieren.
| Thema | Einzelheiten |
|---|---|
| Thema 1 |
|
| Thema 2 |
|
| Thema 3 |
|
| Thema 4 |
|
| Thema 5 |
|
| Thema 6 |
|
35. Frage
You want to test a WAN circuit in a way that more closely simulates a single SCP or FTP file transfer. Which method should you use?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
The correct answer is B . Versa documentation for internet speed tests explains that when you run an internet speed test from a Director node, it creates approximately 200 sessions . This is useful for measuring aggregate throughput, but it does not represent the behavior of a single application flow. The same documentation states that you can run a speed test with a single session from the device CLI, and that this is useful for simulating file transfer rates when using SCP or FTP .
Therefore, when the goal is to understand how a single file transfer behaves, the CLI-based single-session test is the best option. A default Director-based test may produce higher aggregate results because multiple sessions can use parallelism and better fill the pipe.
show interfaces brief is useful for interface status and addressing, but it does not measure file-transfer throughput. SLA latency is useful for path-quality monitoring, but latency alone does not show single- session TCP throughput.
36. Frage
You are asked to deploy a Versa Secure SD-WAN branch for 1000 locations. You need to profile the branches based on common deployment requirements.
In this scenario, which three configuration objects would be shared by multiple appliances? (Choose three.)
Antwort: B,D,E
Begründung:
The correct answers are A, B, and D . For large-scale Versa Secure SD-WAN onboarding, common configuration is reusable through templates and grouping. A device template , also known as a post-staging template, provides the common base configuration that is applied to multiple VOS branch appliances. Versa documentation repeatedly shows configuration tasks being performed under Templates > Device Templates , where an organization is selected and the post-staging template is opened in Appliance view for common configuration.
A device group is also shared by multiple appliances because it groups devices that should receive the same template associations and common service behavior. This is the proper way to profile many branches with similar deployment requirements. Service templates are also shared objects. They are used to apply service- specific configurations, such as SD-WAN traffic steering, application steering, QoS, security, or other common services, across devices. Versa SD-WAN design documentation explains that application-steering templates automate business-intent policies and simplify management by combining application classification, forwarding-class mapping, and SD-WAN policy logic in a reusable template.
A workflow device is device-specific, and device bind data contains site-specific values such as interface addressing, gateways, VLANs, and other per-branch parameters. Therefore, those are not the shared configuration objects.
37. Frage
What are three roles that VOS performs? (Choose three.)
Antwort: A,C,D
Begründung:
The correct answers are A, B, and E . Versa Operating System, or VOS , is the software platform used for Versa SD-WAN branch and headend functions. Versa troubleshooting documentation explicitly refers to common runtime state across SD-WAN Controller, branch, and hub devices , confirming that VOS is used for Controller and branch-style SD-WAN roles. Versa monitoring documentation also lists SD-WAN branches, SD-WAN Controller nodes, SD-WAN hubs, vCPEs, and uCPEs as assets that are monitored and managed in Versa Director, which aligns with VOS being used as a branch/edge and controller platform.
VOS can also act as a uCPE platform . Versa documentation includes procedures to configure uCPE on a VOS device, showing that VOS can host or support uCPE deployment use cases.
The originally provided answer A, C, D is not correct. A Log Collector or log forwarder function belongs to the Versa Analytics architecture, not the VOS branch role; Versa's design guide states that the log forwarder is part of the Versa Analytics node or can run as a standalone log-forwarder server.
A Zookeeper arbiter is also not a standard VOS SD-WAN device role in this context.
38. Frage
A customer reports inconsistent application performance between two branches. You find that traffic is transmitted over the Internet circuit but returns over the MPLS circuit. Which CLI output field pair is most useful to confirm this asymmetry?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The correct answer is B . Versa documentation describes checking for asymmetrical SD-WAN paths when troubleshooting bandwidth and throughput issues. It gives the example of traffic being transmitted on one transport network and returning on another transport network that has different bandwidth. To check whether traffic is traversing an asymmetrical SD-WAN path, Versa recommends using show orgs org organization- name sessions sdwan brief.
In that output, the key fields are RX WAN CKT and TX WAN CKT . If the SD-WAN paths are symmetrical, the circuits shown in the RX and TX WAN circuit fields must be the same on the local and remote sites. If traffic goes out over Internet and returns over MPLS, throughput may differ depending on the bandwidth and quality of each circuit.
Source and destination zones are security-policy concepts, while BGP local preference and MED are routing attributes. Tenant ID and VSN ID identify context, but they do not directly prove directional WAN-circuit asymmetry.
39. Frage
Examine the CLI output in the exhibit.
You are reviewing the OSPF adjacency on a VOS CPE, and the output is shown in the exhibit. In this scenario, what is the probable cause of the OSPF adjacency issue?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as "exchange start," followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.
Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart.
Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.
40. Frage
......
VNX301 Fragen&Antworten: https://www.examfragen.de/VNX301-pruefung-fragen.html