Preparing Relativity RCA Exam is Easy with Our High-quality RCA Minimum Pass Score: Relativity Certified Administrator

P.S. Free 2026 Relativity RCA dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ITCertMagic: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ex0Jp4E6JAgml1QES80Jr7oGu0i-nB7L

Do you want to catch up with the trend in the IT industry? Being certified by Relativity RCA exam certification means a large possibility of success. While our RCA exam targeted training will help you step ahead of others. The valid RCA study practice will make your thoughts more clear, and you will have the ability to deal with problem in the practical application. Then, passing the RCA Actual Test is an easy and simple thing. If you still have some doubts, please download ITCertMagic RCA free demo for a try. You will be surprised.

Relativity RCA Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionObjectives
Workspace Administration- Workspace configuration
- Permissions and security
Case Administration- User and group management
- Case setup and management
Productions & Outputs- Productions setup
- Export and reporting
Analytics & Review Management- Review workflows
- Structured analytics
Data Management & Ingestion- File upload and import workflows
- Data loading

>> RCA Minimum Pass Score <<

100% Pass 2026 Fantastic Relativity RCA Minimum Pass Score

Don't need a lot of time and money, only 30 hours of special training, and you can easily pass your first time to attend Relativity Certification RCA Exam. ITCertMagic are able to provide you with test exercises which are closely similar with real exam questions.

Relativity Certified Administrator Sample Questions (Q31-Q36):

NEW QUESTION # 31
Why would Review Center charts show "Unknown User 1" for some coded documents?

Answer: A

Explanation:
The correct answer is B. A reviewer was originally part of the workspace and coded documents, but has since been removed from the workspace. Relativity's official Review Center documentation explains that when documents were coded by reviewers who are not part of the current Relativity instance , those reviewers can appear in charts and tables as "Unknown User 1," "Unknown User 2," and so on. The documentation specifically notes that this can happen if a reviewer was removed from the workspace or if the workspace was archived and restored into a different instance. That directly supports option B.
The other options do not match Relativity's documented explanation. Losing permission to code is not the stated reason for the "Unknown User" label. Likewise, an unprepared project is a separate project-state issue and does not explain why specific prior coding activity would be attributed to an anonymous placeholder. An error requiring queue re-preparation is also not the documented cause of this naming behavior. From a case administration perspective, this is an important concept because administrators often manage workspace users, permissions, and lifecycle changes over time. If prior reviewers are removed, their historical coding may still appear in analytics or project monitoring views, but the user identity may no longer resolve normally. In that circumstance, Review Center surfaces those coding records under a label such as
"Unknown User 1."


NEW QUESTION # 32
A reviewer cannot find a specific document using dtSearch. Why might this be?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The fields returned by the Searchable Set saved search are all empty for this document. Relativity documents that dtSearch indexes are built against a Searchable Set, and administrators must manually update those indexes when the underlying document search sets change. Relativity also describes dtSearch as indexing the content made available through the configured search/index setup rather than magically finding text that is not present in the indexed fields. If the document is part of the saved search but the fields being indexed for that document are empty, there is effectively no searchable text for dtSearch to return for that record.
Option B is not the best answer because an incremental build is a maintenance activity for adding new documents, not the documented reason a single already-known document cannot be found. Relativity notes that incremental builds look for new documents in the searchable set and do not re-index previously indexed records with changed content, which is a different issue. Option D is unrelated because Review Center queue assignment does not control whether a document is searchable through a dtSearch index. Option A is also not the best explanation for this question; dtSearch availability is driven by index/searchable-set configuration and accessible indexed text, not by parent-email folder access in the way the option suggests. So the best RCA-aligned answer is that the document has no indexed searchable content in the fields returned by the searchable set.


NEW QUESTION # 33
Which action requires a saved search?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Building a search terms report. Relativity's Search Terms Report documentation requires you to define report information including a Searchable Set, which is a saved search containing the documents to be evaluated by the STR. Relativity's guidance for using STRs also states that you should define a saved search that returns the required document population for the searchable set. That makes a saved search a required component of building a search terms report.
The other options do not inherently require a saved search. A keyword search can be run directly in the search panel. A dashboard can be created without requiring a saved search as its core prerequisite. A persistent highlight set is commonly used with STR output, but the question asks which action itself requires a saved search, and the STR workflow is the one explicitly documented to require one. Therefore, the correct answer is Building a search terms report.


NEW QUESTION # 34
A reviewer updated the coding decision on a document from null to Responsive on the single choice Responsive Designation field. You later discover this coding decision was incorrect. You attempt to use Audit to revert the coding decision, but find you are unable to revert. Why might this be?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. You cannot use Audit to revert coding decisions on required fields back to a null state. Relativity's official Audit documentation states that certain field types, including single choice , can be reverted. However, it also explicitly states that you cannot revert a required field if doing so would return that field to a blank null value . That is exactly what this scenario describes: the field was changed from null to Responsive, and reverting would restore it to null. If the field is required, Relativity blocks that revert because required fields cannot be blank.
This means option A is incorrect because single-choice fields can be reverted in Audit. Option B is also incorrect because Relativity supports both individual and mass revert workflows depending on the situation.
Option D is not the documented reason for the failure. The controlling issue is the required-field constraint.
From an RCA perspective, this is a subtle but important administrative behavior: the Audit system can revert field changes, but only where the resulting value remains valid under Relativity's field rules. If the revert would violate a field's required setting, the system will not allow it. Therefore, the most accurate reason is that Audit cannot revert the value because the revert would place a required field back into a null state .


NEW QUESTION # 35
What setting is needed to have the Prioritized Review queue refresh automatically through Review Center?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The correct answer is A. "Queue Refresh" must be set to "On". Relativity's Review Center admin documentation states that Queue Refresh controls whether the queue automatically refreshes after coding activity . For prioritized review queues, that refresh includes re-running the saved search, checking for outside-coded documents, retraining the classifier, and re-ranking documents based on the latest coding. That makes Queue Refresh the setting required for automatic queue refreshing.
Relativity also documents that prioritized review queues auto-refresh when there has been a 20% change in total coded documents, and additionally after 8 hours if there has been coding activity. Those are auto-refresh conditions, but they do not replace the need for the Queue Refresh setting itself. Option B therefore describes a trigger condition, not the required setting. Options C and D are not documented as the needed configuration for automatic refresh. Therefore, the correct answer is that Queue Refresh must be turned on .


NEW QUESTION # 36
......

Our RCA exam materials are famous among candidates. Once they need to prepare an exam, our RCA study materials are their first choice. As you know, it is troublesome to get the RCAcertificate. Now, you are fortunate enough to come across our RCA Exam Guide. We have free demos on the website for our customers to download if you still doubt our products, and you can check whether it is the right one for you before purchase as well.

New RCA Braindumps Pdf: https://www.itcertmagic.com/Relativity/real-RCA-exam-prep-dumps.html

What's more, part of that ITCertMagic RCA dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ex0Jp4E6JAgml1QES80Jr7oGu0i-nB7L