P.S. Free 2026 Juniper JN0-352 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PrepAwayPDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E-YEhKDwpi3PMh7gsvmrX6NzKAq_rAfX
The online version is open to any electronic equipment, at the same time, the online version of our JN0-352 study materials can also be used in an offline state. You just need to use the online version at the first time when you are in an online state; you can have the right to use the version of our JN0-352 Study Materials offline. And if you are willing to take our JN0-352 study materials into more consideration, it must be very easy for you to pass your JN0-352 exam in a short time.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol Independent Routing | 10-15% | - Basic routing policy and filter operation - Routing tables, static routes and route preference - Routing instances and route selection criteria |
| High Availability and Resiliency | 5-10% | - Network resiliency design and troubleshooting - Graceful restart and non-stop routing - Redundancy protocols and failover mechanisms |
| Layer 2 Switching and VLANs | 15-20% | - VLAN concepts, configuration, trunking and tagging - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP, RSTP, MSTP) operation and configuration - Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) and Virtual Chassis |
| OSPF | 15-20% | - Neighbor formation, area design and LSA types - Route summarization and redistribution - Configuration, verification and troubleshooting |
| IS-IS | 10-15% | - Scalable enterprise deployment and troubleshooting - Adjacency establishment, levels and metrics - Configuration and route exchange |
| IP Multicast | 5-10% | - Multicast routing monitoring and troubleshooting - PIM Dense Mode, Sparse Mode and RP mechanisms - IGMP operation and configuration |
| Layer 2 Security | 10-15% | - DHCP snooping, Dynamic ARP Inspection and IP Source Guard - Port security, MAC limiting and storm control - Layer 2 firewall filters and security features |
| BGP | 15-20% | - Neighbor relationships and session establishment - Route advertisement, attributes and path selection - Routing policies, filtering and common troubleshooting |
| Tunnels and Overlays | 5-10% | - Tunnel types, encapsulation and operation - GRE, IP-IP and dynamic tunnel configuration - Overlay network design and connectivity |
>> Juniper JN0-352 Reliable Exam Voucher <<
PrepAwayPDF not only provide the products which have high quality to each candidate, but also provides a comprehensive after-sales service. If you are using our JN0-352 products, we will let you enjoy one year of free updates. So that you can get the latest exam information in time. We will be use the greatest efficiency to service each candidate.
NEW QUESTION # 91 
Click the Exhibit button.
Which two statements about the IS-IS output shown in the exhibit are correct? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
This detailed adjacency output shows R3 maintaining four separate, fully Up adjacencies, evenly split between the two IS-IS levels. R1 and R2 are both formed at Level 1, confirming that R3 is directly adjacent to exactly two Level 1 neighbors within its local area, which validates that statement. R4 and R5 are both formed at Level 2, and Level 2 adjacencies are, by definition, part of the IS-IS backbone that interconnects areas; a router maintaining any Level 2 adjacency is by that fact participating in and connected to the Level 2 backbone, confirming R3's backbone connectivity as well. Every one of the four listed adjacencies explicitly shows 'Speaks: IP, IPv6' in its detail output, which is Junos's way of indicating that both the IPv4 and IPv6 address families have been successfully negotiated and are active over that circuit; this directly contradicts, rather than supports, the claim that IPv6 is disabled on these neighbors - if IPv6 were disabled, the Speaks field would list only IP. Regarding authentication, the output contains no field, flag, or indication whatsoever referencing authentication configuration or state for the R5 adjacency (or any adjacency); Junos would typically surface authentication-related information separately if it were configured and relevant, and its complete absence here means no basis exists in the exhibit to conclude authentication is required for that specific adjacency. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Routing - IS-IS, Level 1 and Level 2 Adjacencies and Address Family Negotiation.
NEW QUESTION # 92
You have configured a GRE tunnel from your local router with tunnel source 10.0.0.1 to a remote router at destination 192.168.0.1. The tunnel is functioning until you commit set routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop gr-0/0/0. This configuration causes the tunnel to go down. Which statement is correct in this scenario?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A GRE tunnel's outer, delivery-layer packets are forwarded using the router's ordinary underlay routing table, meaning the tunnel destination address (192.168.0.1 in this case) must itself be resolvable to a physical, non-tunnel next hop for the encapsulated packets to actually leave the router. Before this configuration change, the default route (or some more specific route) presumably pointed toward a real physical next hop, allowing the router to reach 192.168.0.1 and keep the tunnel operational. When the administrator commits a static default route of 0.0.0.0/0 with a next hop of gr-0/0/0, every destination lookup that previously fell back to the default route -- including the lookup for the tunnel's own destination address, 192.168.0.1, since no more specific route exists for it -- now recurses through the GRE interface itself. This creates a circular dependency: the router needs to route to 192.168.0.1 to keep the tunnel up, but the only route it has to reach 192.168.0.1 now points back into the tunnel that requires 192.168.0.1 to already be reachable, so the interface's next-hop resolution fails and the tunnel drops. This is an entirely valid and common GRE design pitfall rather than any platform restriction; GRE interfaces can be legitimately used as static route next hops, do not require loopback-sourced encapsulation, and do not require a /32 host route to resolve their destination, provided that route does not recursively point back through the tunnel.
NEW QUESTION # 93
Which three statements are correct about OSPF packet types? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,B,C
NEW QUESTION # 94
How many bytes of overhead does an IP-IP tunnel add to a packet?
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 95
Two Juniper Networks EX Series Switches are connected with four 1-GbE links configured as a single link aggregation group (LAG). One of the physical member links experiences a failure.
By default, what impact will this failure have on traffic forwarding between the switches?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A link aggregation group bundles multiple physical Ethernet links into a single logical interface (an ae interface) specifically to provide both increased aggregate bandwidth and link-level redundancy. By default, the aeX interface remains operationally up as long as at least one member link within the bundle remains active and passing traffic; the LAG does not require every member link to be functional to continue operating.
When one of the four 1-GbE member links in this scenario fails, LACP (if in use) or the underlying link- status monitoring detects the failure, removes that specific link from the active forwarding set, and redistributes traffic hashing across the three remaining healthy member links automatically and without operator intervention. End devices and upper-layer protocols continue to see a single, continuously up ae interface throughout this process, experiencing only a proportional reduction in available aggregate bandwidth rather than any interruption in connectivity. This default behavior is precisely why LAG is a foundational building block for resilient EX Series switch interconnects in enterprise and data center designs, since it allows individual optic, cable, or transceiver failures to be absorbed transparently. None of the distractor behaviors - full administrative shutdown of the bundle, forwarding limited to broadcast traffic only, or a temporary disabling of all member links during renegotiation - reflect actual Junos LAG behavior, which is designed explicitly to avoid any such disruption. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Switching - Layer 2 Switching, Link Aggregation Group Resiliency.
NEW QUESTION # 96
......
The purchase procedure of our companyโs website is safe. The download, installation and using are safe and we guarantee to you that there are no virus in our product. We provide the best service and the best JN0-352 exam torrent to you and we guarantee that the quality of our product is good. Many people worry that the electronic JN0-352 Guide Torrent will boost virus and even some people use unprofessional anti-virus software which will misreport the virus. Please believe us because the service and the JN0-352 study materials are both good and that our product and website are absolutely safe without any virus.
Exam JN0-352 Learning: https://www.prepawaypdf.com/Juniper/JN0-352-practice-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest PrepAwayPDF JN0-352 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E-YEhKDwpi3PMh7gsvmrX6NzKAq_rAfX