Our website is a very secure and regular platform. Firstly, we guarantee the security of the company's website whiling purchasing process of JN0-650 exam torrent. Secondly, for all customer information about purchasing JN0-650 practice test, we will be maintained by specialized personnel and absolutely no information disclosure will occur. To the last but also the most important, our JN0-650 Exam Materials have the merit of high quality based on the high pass rate as 98% to 100%. The data speak louder than the other words. You should be confident with our JN0-650 training prep.
| Certification Vendor: | Juniper Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) |
| Exam Number: | JN0-650 |
| Exam Duration: | 120 minutes |
| Available Languages: | English, Japanese |
| Exam Format: | Simulation, Multiple Select, Multiple Choice, Drag and Drop |
| Real Exam Qty: | 70-80 |
| Passing Score: | Pass / Fail (variable scale) |
| Exam Price: | $400 USD |
| Related Certifications: | JNCIS-ENT (JN0-349) JNCIA-ENT (JN0-347) |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Sample Questions: | Juniper JN0-650 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online Proctored (OnVue) / In-Person Testing Center (Pearson VUE) |
| Pre Condition: | JNCIA-ENT (JN0-347) or equivalent knowledge recommended; no mandatory prerequisite for exam eligibility |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/track-data-center.html |
There are rare products which can rival with our products and enjoy the high recognition and trust by the clients like our products. Our products provide the JN0-650 study materials to clients and help they pass the test JN0-650 certification which is highly authorized and valuable. Our company is a famous company which bears the world-wide influences and our JN0-650 Study Materials are recognized as the most representative and advanced study materials among the same kinds of products. Whether the qualities and functions or the service of our product, are leading and we boost the most professional expert team domestically.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 30
Which Junos command displays the routes that are being received from a specific BGP neighbor?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 31
Exhibit
You are receiving the 203 0.113.0/24 route from both upstream ISPs You are asked to ensure that ISP A is the preferred ISP for traffic being sent to the 203.0.113.0/24 network from devices in AS 65512.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements will accomplish this behavior? (Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The exhibit illustrates an Autonomous System (AS 65512) receiving the same prefix ($203.0.113.0/24$) from two different neighbors, ISP A and ISP B. To influence outbound traffic from AS 65512 so that ISP A is preferred, you must manipulate the BGP Local Preference attribute.BGP Path Selection and Local Preference:
Local preference is the first attribute evaluated by BGP after checking if the next hop is reachable. A higher local preference value is always preferred over a lower one. The default value in Junos OS is 100.Applying the Preference (Option B): By applying an import policy on router R1 to set a local preference higher than
100 (e.g., 200) for routes from ISP A, R1, R2, and R3 will all prefer the path through R1 to reach ISP A.
Applying the Preference (Option C): Alternatively, you can achieve the same result by applying an import policy on R2 to set a local preference lower than 100 (e.g., 50) for routes from ISP B. Since the routes from R1 remain at the default of 100, the path through ISP A (100) will be preferred over ISP B (50).Why A and D are incorrect: Setting a lower preference for ISP A (Option A) or a higher preference for ISP B (Option D) would result in ISP B being preferred for outbound traffic, which is the opposite of the requirement.
NEW QUESTION # 32
Exhibit.
You have determined that traffic in your network is being routed through your route reflector instead of using the optimal path. Referring to the exhibit, what are two configuration changes on the route reflector that would solve the problem? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
The exhibit shows a BGP Route Reflector (RR) configuration where an export policy named NHS (Next-Hop Self) is applied to the internal BGP group int-group. The policy NHS sets the next-hop self attribute for BGP routes.
* The Problem (Traffic Tromboning): In a standard BGP Route Reflector design, the RR should reflect routes without modifying the BGP next-hop attribute. By applying a next-hop self policy on the export to clients, the RR tells all its clients that it is the exit point for those routes. Consequently, all data plane traffic is sent to the RR first before being forwarded to the actual destination, rather than following the optimal direct path between clients. This is known as "traffic tromboning" or suboptimal routing.
* The Solution (Option C): The most direct way to fix this is to delete the export policy that is forcing the next-hop to be the RR. By deleting protocols bgp group int-group export NHS, the RR will resume standard behavior and reflect the original next-hop received from the route source, allowing clients to route traffic directly to the correct destination.
* The Refined Solution (Option D): If you must keep the NHS policy (perhaps for routes learned from external peers), you should ensure it only applies to those specific routes. By adding from route-type internal to the policy term and then potentially changing the logic (or simply narrowing the scope), you can prevent the RR from incorrectly applying next-hop self to internal routes that it is merely reflecting.
In the context of this specific problem, Option D combined with a change in the policy's action or scope helps ensure reflected internal routes maintain their original, optimal next-hops.
* Option A is incorrect because setting next-hop self for external routes is common practice, but it doesn't solve the problem of internal reflected routes being diverted to the RR.
* Option B is incorrect because applying this as an import policy would change how the RR itself sees the routes, but it wouldn't fix the attributes being sent out to the clients in the reflection process.
NEW QUESTION # 33
What does the 'inet6' NLRI family signify in BGP configurations on Junos devices?
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 34
Which variables directly influence an MDRR scheduler's behavior in Junos OS? (Choose two)
Answer: B,E
NEW QUESTION # 35
......
Latest JN0-650 Test Answers: https://www.passtestking.com/Juniper/JN0-650-practice-exam-dumps.html