P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Exams4sures: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lBlUEDRVa0vXq_QSW4xFuRKggN87RTt8
Nowadays the competition in the job market is fiercer than any time in the past. If you want to find a good job，you must own good competences and skillful major knowledge. So owning the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is necessary for you because we will provide the best study materials to you. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Torrent is of high quality and efficient, and it can help you pass the test successfully.
| Certification Vendor: | PECB |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor |
| Exam Number: | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple choice, Essay-type questions |
| Exam Price: | USD 500 |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Available Languages: | French, Portuguese, German, Spanish, English |
| Related Certifications: | PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Foundation |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years (with maintenance requirement) |
| Sample Questions: | PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored exam or at authorized testing centers worldwide |
| Pre Condition: | Candidates should have a foundational understanding of ISO/IEC 27001 and audit principles. It is recommended (but not mandatory) to have completed the PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer training or equivalent experience. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://pecb.com/en/education/iso-iec-27001-lead-auditor |
>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Book <<
The example on the right was a simple widget designed Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Pdf to track points in a rewards program, The pearsonvue website is not affiliated with us, Although computers are great at gathering, manipulating, and calculating raw data, humans prefer their data presented in an orderly fashion. This means keying the shots using a plug-in or specialized New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Question software application, As is most often the case, you will need to expend some effort to deploy security measures,and when they are deployed, you will incur a level of administrative Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam overhead and operational inconvenience, and may also find that there is an impact to network performance.
To be eligible to take the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam, candidates must have at least five years of professional experience in information security, with two years of experience in ISMS auditing. They must also have completed a PECB-certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor training course or an equivalent. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam consists of two parts: a written exam and a practical exam. The written exam is a four-hour closed-book exam, while the practical exam is a two-hour role-play exercise that simulates an actual audit.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam is an essential qualification for professionals who are looking to advance their careers in the field of information security management. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam is beneficial for individuals who wish to take on roles such as ISMS auditor, compliance officer, security manager, or information security consultant. Obtaining the certification demonstrates to employers and clients that the individual possesses the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and audit ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 standard requirements.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is a certification designed for professionals who want to demonstrate their expertise in auditing Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is offered by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a leading organization in the field of ISO standards and certifications. The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification ensures that auditors have the knowledge and skills to assess the effectiveness of an organization's ISMS and identify areas for improvement.
NEW QUESTION # 392
You are performing an ISMS audit at a nursing home where residents always wear an electronic wristband for monitoring their location, heartbeat, and blood pressure. The wristband automatically uploads this data to a cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis by staff.
You now wish to verify that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management. You are sampling the mobile device policy and identify a security objective of this policy is "to ensure the security of teleworking and use of mobile devices" The policy states the following controls will be applied in order to achieve this.
Personal mobile devices are prohibited from connecting to the nursing home network, processing, and storing residents' data.
The company's mobile devices within the ISMS scope shall be registered in the asset register.
The company's mobile devices shall implement or enable physical protection, i.e., pin-code protected screen lock/unlock, facial or fingerprint to unlock the device.
The company's mobile devices shall have a regular backup.
To verify that the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented and effective, select three options for your audit trail.
Answer: C,D,E
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 5.2 requires top management to establish an information security policy that provides the framework for setting information security objectives1. Clause 6.2 requires top management to ensure that the information security objectives are established at relevant functions and levels1. Therefore, when verifying that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management, an ISMS auditor should review relevant documents and records that demonstrate top management's involvement and commitment.
To verify that the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented and effective, an ISMS auditor should review relevant documents and records that demonstrate how the policy and objectives are communicated, monitored, measured, analyzed, and evaluated. The auditor should also sample and verify the implementation of the controls that are stated in the policy.
Three options for the audit trail that are relevant to verifying the mobile device policy and objectives are:
* Review the internal audit report to make sure the IT department has been audited: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the IT department, which is responsible for managing the mobile devices and their security, has been evaluated for its conformity and effectiveness in implementing the mobile device policy and objectives. The internal audit report can also reveal any nonconformities, corrective actions, or opportunities for improvement related to the mobile device policy and objectives.
* Sampling some mobile devices from on-duty medical staff and validate the mobile device information with the asset register: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the mobile devices that are used by the medical staff, who are involved in processing and storing residents' data, are registered in the asset register and have physical protection enabled. This can verify the implementation and effectiveness of two of the controls that are stated in the mobile device policy.
* Review the asset register to make sure all company's mobile devices are registered: This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the company's mobile devices that are within the ISMS scope are identified and accounted for. This can verify the implementation and effectiveness of one of the controls that are stated in the mobile device policy.
The other options for the audit trail are not relevant to verifying the mobile device policy and objectives, as they are not related to the policy or objectives or their implementation or effectiveness. For example:
* Interview the reception personnel to make sure all visitor and employee bags are checked before entering the nursing home: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective regarding physical security or access control, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Review visitors' register book to make sure no visitor can have their personal mobile phone in the nursing home: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective regarding information security awareness or compliance, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Interview the supplier of the devices to make sure they are aware of the ISMS policy: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to another policy or objective regarding information security within supplier relationships, but not specifically to mobile devices.
* Interview top management to verify their involvement in establishing the information security policy and the information security objectives: This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the mobile device policy and objectives are implemented or effective. It may be related to verifying that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management, but not specifically to mobile devices.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 393
Question:
What is the main reason for sending an engagement letter before the initial contact with the auditee?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
* B. Correct Answer:
* The engagement letter serves to inform the auditee about the audit details, including:
* Audit scope
* Audit schedule
* Expectations from both parties
* It formally introduces the audit process and schedules the initial contact.
* A. Incorrect:
* The authority to conduct the audit is established by the certification body's agreement, not just the engagement letter.
* C. Incorrect:
* Audit objectives are determined in the planning phase and are not the primary function of the engagement letter.
Relevant Standard Reference:
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.2 (Initiating the Audit)
NEW QUESTION # 394
You are performing an ISMS audit at a European-based residential
nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services. You find all nursing home residents wear an electronic wristband for monitoring their location, heartbeat, and blood pressure always. You learned that the electronic wristband automatically uploads all data to the artificial intelligence (AI) cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis by healthcare staff.
The next step in your audit plan is to verify that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management.
During the audit, you found the following audit evidence.
Match the audit evidence to the corresponding requirement in ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 395
Which two of the following actions are the individual(s) managing the audit programme responsible for?
Answer: E,F
Explanation:
Explanation
* Establishing the audit programme objectives, scope and criteria
* Determining the resources necessary for the audit programme, such as the audit team members, the budget, the time, the tools, etc.
* Selecting and appointing the audit team leaders and auditors
* Reviewing and approving the audit plans and arrangements
* Ensuring the effective communication and coordination among the audit programme stakeholders, such as the auditors, the auditees, the certification bodies, the accreditation bodies, etc.
* Keeping informed the accreditation body on the progress of the audit programme, especially in case of any significant changes, issues, or nonconformities
* Monitoring and reviewing the performance and results of the audit programme and the audit teams
* Evaluating the feedback and satisfaction of the auditees and other interested parties
* Identifying and implementing the opportunities for improvement of the audit programme The individual(s) managing the audit programme are not responsible for the following tasks, which are delegated to the audit team leaders or the auditors12:
* Communicating with the auditee during the audit, such as conducting the opening and closing meetings, resolving any audit-related problems, reporting any audit findings, etc.
* Determining the legal requirements applicable to each audit, such as the confidentiality, the impartiality, the consent, the liability, etc.
* Defining the objectives, scope and criteria for an individual audit, which are derived from the audit programme and agreed with the auditee
* Defining the plan of an individual audit, which includes the audit schedule, the audit activities, the audit methods, the audit documents, etc.
References:
* ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, pages 19-20
NEW QUESTION # 396
Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.
Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic's security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments. Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.
During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC 27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Auditors recommended Techmanic for certification after following up on corrective actions remotely. Is this acceptable?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
Remote follow-ups are acceptable for minor nonconformities, as long as auditors can verify corrective actions.
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 allows remote follow-ups when the effectiveness of corrective actions can be demonstrated.
B . Incorrect:
Follow-ups are required, but remote verification is acceptable for minor issues.
C . Incorrect:
An on-site follow-up is not mandatory unless major nonconformities are present.
Relevant Standard Reference:
NEW QUESTION # 397
......
Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Tutorials: https://www.exams4sures.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Exams4sures ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lBlUEDRVa0vXq_QSW4xFuRKggN87RTt8