The free demo AB-650 practice question is available for instant download. Download the AB-650 exam dumps demo free of cost and explores the top features of Microsoft AB-650 exam questions and if you feel that the Microsoft AB-650 Exam Questions can be helpful in Administering Microsoft 365 and AI Services (AB-650) exam preparation then take your buying decision.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Manage and secure AI services in Microsoft 365 | 35-40% | - Implement and manage agents and Agent 365
|
| Topic 2: Govern and secure Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 40-45% | - Manage identities in Microsoft Entra
|
| Topic 3: Configure and manage Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 20-25% | - Manage Microsoft 365 workloads
|
>> Latest AB-650 Test Sample <<
It is quite clear that many people would like to fall back on the most authoritative company no matter when they have any question about preparing for AB-650 exam or met with any problem. I am proud to tell you that our company is definitely one of the most authoritative companies in the international market for AB-650 Exam. What's more, we will provide the most considerate after sale service for our customers in twenty four hours a day seven days a week, therefore, our company is really the best choice for you to buy the AB-650 training materials.
NEW QUESTION # 26
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.
You create an outbound anti-spam policy named Policy1 as shown in the following exhibit.
You assign Policy1 to User1.
What is the maximum number of email messages that User1 can send in a 24-hour period?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 outbound anti-spam policies allow administrators to configure hourly external and internal recipient limits, along with an overall daily recipient limit.
The exhibit specifies three restrictions: an external limit of 10 per hour, an internal limit of 20 per hour, and a combined daily limit of 1,000.
The maximum combined hourly allowance is calculated as follows:
10 + 20 = 30
Across 24 hours, the theoretical maximum is:
30 x 24 = 720
Therefore, Option B (720) is the intended answer because the combined hourly restrictions impose a tighter limit than the configured daily maximum of 1,000.
Option A represents the maximum combined allowance for one hour rather than 24 hours.
Option C incorrectly considers only the daily limit without applying the hourly restrictions.
Option D incorrectly adds the daily limit to the hourly allowances, even though the restrictions operate together.
Technical distinction: Microsoft ' s current documentation specifies these limits in terms of recipients rather than individual email messages. The calculation of 720 messages assumes one recipient per message, with both hourly allowances fully utilized. Messages addressed to multiple recipients consume more of the recipient allowance, so the exact number of messages can be lower.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-policies-configure
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-sending-limits-troubleshoot
NEW QUESTION # 27
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that uses Microsoft Exchange.
The subscription contains a licensed user mailbox named Mailbox1 that has a primary SMTP address of support@contoso.com. Mailbox1 is 72 GB.
Mailbox1 will no longer be used by a single user. Three support users must manage the existing support email sent to Mailbox1.
You need to configure Mailbox1 access for the support users. The solution must meet the following requirements:
Enable the support users to open Mailbox1.
Preserve all the existing content in Mailbox1.
Configure replies to appear as sent from support@contoso.com.
What should you do?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Converting an existing Exchange Online user mailbox into a shared mailbox allows multiple employees to manage correspondence while preserving its existing messages, calendar information, and mailbox content.
Option B is correct because it satisfies the storage, access, and sender identity requirements.
The critical consideration is the mailbox size. Mailbox1 contains 72 GB of data, exceeding the 50 GB storage limit for an unlicensed shared mailbox. Microsoft requires an appropriate license, such as Exchange Online Plan 2, to increase a shared mailbox ' s primary mailbox capacity to 100 GB.
Consequently, the mailbox must retain suitable licensing after conversion.
Full Access permissions allow support users to open Mailbox1 and manage its existing content. Send As permissions enable users to send replies that appear to originate directly from support@contoso.com, without displaying the individual delegate ' s identity.
Option A is incorrect because removing the license would leave the 72 GB mailbox above the unlicensed shared mailbox storage limit.
Option C is incorrect because Send on Behalf displays the delegate ' s identity and also proposes removing the required license.
Option D does not preserve the existing mailbox as a shared mailbox with the specified delegation permissions.
The appropriate configuration is therefore to convert Mailbox1, grant Full Access and Send As, and retain the necessary license.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/email/convert-user-mailbox-to-shared-mailbox
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/email/about-shared-mailboxes
NEW QUESTION # 28
You need to implement CAPolicy1. The solution must meet the technical requirements.
Which two Conditional Access settings should you configure? To answer, select the appropriate settings in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra Conditional Access integrates with Microsoft Entra ID Protection to evaluate risky authentication attempts and enforce additional security requirements based on detected sign-in risk.
The Contoso technical requirement states that Group3 users accessing Microsoft 365 resources from anonymous IP addresses must complete multifactor authentication (MFA).
First selection: Sign-in risk.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection recognizes sign-ins from anonymous IP addresses, including anonymous VPNs and Tor exit nodes, as potential security risks.
Administrators can configure the Sign-in risk condition in CAPolicy1 to evaluate authentication attempts based on their calculated risk level. Microsoft recommends considering medium and high sign-in risk for MFA enforcement, depending on the organization ' s security requirements.
Second selection: Grant.
The Grant access control determines which authentication requirements must be satisfied before access is permitted.
Administrators should select Grant access and configure the built-in Multifactor authentication strength, or the corresponding Require multifactor authentication control where available.
Because CAPolicy1 already targets Group3 and all resources, these selections apply risk-based MFA requirements to the intended users and Microsoft 365 resources.
Technical qualification: Sign-in risk policies operate on calculated risk levels, not exclusively on anonymous IP addresses. Consequently, they may also trigger for other risky sign-ins and cannot guarantee that every anonymous-IP connection is challenged.
NEW QUESTION # 29
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription.
You need to enable passwordless authentication for all users.
Which authentication method and portal should you use? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra ID supports passwordless authentication through several technologies, including Microsoft Authenticator, Windows Hello for Business, and FIDO2 security keys.
First selection: Microsoft Authenticator.
Microsoft Authenticator supports passwordless phone sign-in using device-based cryptographic authentication. Instead of entering a password, users approve authentication requests through the mobile application, complete number matching, and verify their identity using a device PIN or biometric authentication.
Email OTP, SMS, and voice calls do not provide the same Microsoft Entra passwordless phone sign-in capability.
Second selection: Microsoft Entra admin center.
The Microsoft Entra admin center provides centralized configuration of authentication methods through Entra ID # Authentication methods # Policies.
An administrator with at least the Authentication Policy Administrator role can select Microsoft Authenticator, enable it for all users, and configure the authentication mode to support passwordless sign-in.
The Microsoft 365 admin center primarily manages Microsoft 365 services, users, subscriptions, and licensing. The Microsoft Defender portal focuses on security monitoring and threat protection. Neither is the dedicated administrative interface for configuring Microsoft Entra authentication methods.
Implementation consideration: Enabling the authentication method does not automatically register every user.
Users must register Microsoft Authenticator and activate passwordless phone sign-in before using it.
Administrators can use Temporary Access Pass to support onboarding.
Therefore, Microsoft Authenticator and the Microsoft Entra admin center are the correct selections.
NEW QUESTION # 30
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.
You create an outbound anti-spam policy named Policy1 as shown in the following exhibit.
You assign Policy1 to User1.
What is the maximum number of email messages that User1 can send in a 24-hour period?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 outbound anti-spam policies allow administrators to configure hourly external and internal recipient limits, along with an overall daily recipient limit.
The exhibit specifies three restrictions: an external limit of 10 per hour, an internal limit of 20 per hour, and a combined daily limit of 1,000.
The maximum combined hourly allowance is calculated as follows:
10 + 20 = 30
Across 24 hours, the theoretical maximum is:
30 × 24 = 720
Therefore, Option B (720) is the intended answer because the combined hourly restrictions impose a tighter limit than the configured daily maximum of 1,000.
Option A represents the maximum combined allowance for one hour rather than 24 hours.
Option C incorrectly considers only the daily limit without applying the hourly restrictions.
Option D incorrectly adds the daily limit to the hourly allowances, even though the restrictions operate together.
Technical distinction: Microsoft ' s current documentation specifies these limits in terms of recipients rather than individual email messages. The calculation of 720 messages assumes one recipient per message, with both hourly allowances fully utilized. Messages addressed to multiple recipients consume more of the recipient allowance, so the exact number of messages can be lower.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-policies-configure
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-sending-limits-troubleshoot
NEW QUESTION # 31
......
To pass the AB-650 exam is not an easy task. It is a challenging exam. However, proper planning and preparation with AB-650 exam questions can enable you to pass the AB-650 exam easily. As far as the Microsoft AB-650 Practice Test are concerned, these AB-650 Practice Test questions are designed and verified by Microsoft AB-650 exam trainers. So you rest assured that with AB-650 exam real questions you can pass Administering Microsoft 365 and AI Services AB-650 exam easily.
Testking AB-650 Learning Materials: https://www.pass4surecert.com/Microsoft/AB-650-practice-exam-dumps.html