Latest Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Dump Must Be a Great Beginning to Prepare for Your Data-Engineer-Associate Exam

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of TopExamCollection Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Y-wYGzGs8vj1rntjL3NX3iied8VYEIEF

The Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate certification brings multiple career benefits. Reputed firms happily hire you for well-paid jobs when you earn the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01). If you are already an employee of a tech company, you get promotions and salary hikes upon getting the Data-Engineer-Associate credential. All these career benefits come when you crack the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate certification examination. To pass the Data-Engineer-Associate test, you need to prepare well from updated practice material such as real Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions.

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Data Ingestion and Transformation34%- Ingest and transform data using AWS services
- Build and manage data pipelines
Data Store Management26%- Select appropriate data storage solutions
- Optimize storage performance and cost
Data Security and Governance18%- Apply governance and compliance best practices
- Implement data security controls
Data Operations and Support22%- Troubleshoot data workflow issues
- Monitor and maintain data pipelines

>> Valid Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions <<

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Dumps PDF Format

The Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions are being offered in three different formats. The names of these formats are AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) desktop practice test software, web-based practice test software, and PDF dumps file. The Amazon desktop practice test software and web-based practice test software both give you real-time Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam environment for quick and complete exam preparation.

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q120-Q125):

NEW QUESTION # 120
A financial company wants to use Amazon Athena to run on-demand SQL queries on a petabyte-scale dataset to support a business intelligence (BI) application. An AWS Glue job that runs during non-business hours updates the dataset once every day. The BI application has a standard data refresh frequency of 1 hour to comply with company policies.
A data engineer wants to cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Answer: D

Explanation:
The best solution to cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs is to use the query result reuse feature of AmazonAthena for the SQL queries. This feature allows you to run the same query multiple times without incurring additional charges, as long as the underlying data has not changed and the query results are still in the query result location in Amazon S31. This feature is useful for scenarios where you have a petabyte-scale dataset that is updated infrequently, such as once a day, and you have a BI application that runs the same queries repeatedly, such as every hour. By using the query result reuse feature, you can reduce the amount of data scanned by your queries and save on the cost of running Athena. You can enable or disable this feature at the workgroup level or at the individual query level1.
Option A is not the best solution, as configuring an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to the S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage class after 1 day would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity. Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies are rules that you can define to automatically transition objects between different storage classes based on specified criteria, such as the age of the object2. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class in Amazon S3, designed for long-term data archiving that is accessed once or twice in a year3. While moving data to S3 Glacier Deep Archive can reduce the storage cost, it would also increase the retrieval cost and latency, as it takes up to 12 hours to restore the data from S3 Glacier Deep Archive3. Moreover, Athena does not support querying data that is in S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage classes4. Therefore, using this option would not meet the requirements of running on-demand SQL queries on the dataset.
Option C is not the best solution, as adding an Amazon ElastiCache cluster between the BI application and Athena would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity. Amazon ElastiCache is a service that offers fully managed in-memory data stores, such as Redis and Memcached, that can improve the performance and scalability of web applications by caching frequently accessed data. While using ElastiCache can reduce the latency and load on the BI application, it would not reduce the amount of data scanned by Athena, which is the main factor that determines the cost of running Athena. Moreover, using ElastiCache would introduce additional infrastructure costs and operational overhead, as you would have to provision, manage, and scale the ElastiCache cluster, and integrate it with the BI application and Athena.
Option D is not the best solution, as changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs, but rather increase the complexity. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes. However,changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would require additional processing and transformation steps, such as using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR to convert the files from their original format to Parquet, and storing the converted files in a separate location in Amazon S3. This would increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, and also incur additional costs for using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR. References:
Query result reuse
Amazon S3 Lifecycle
S3 Glacier Deep Archive
Storage classes supported by Athena
[What is Amazon ElastiCache?]
[Amazon Athena pricing]
[Columnar Storage Formats]
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide


NEW QUESTION # 121
A data engineer is launching an Amazon EMR cluster. The data that the data engineer needs to load into the new cluster is currently in an Amazon S3 bucket. The data engineer needs to ensure that data is encrypted both at rest and in transit.
The data that is in the S3 bucket is encrypted by an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key. The data engineer has an Amazon S3 path that has a Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM) file.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

Answer: C

Explanation:
To meet both encryption at rest and in transit, a single Amazon EMR security configuration can be created specifying the AWS KMS key for encryption at rest and the PEM file for in-transit encryption. The study guide clearly states:
"AWS Key Management Service (KMS) provides encryption for data at rest, and SSL/TLS ensures encryption for data in transit, providing end-to-end encryption within an AWS environment."
- Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf A single security configuration is sufficient and the cleanest way to apply these security features during EMR cluster setup.


NEW QUESTION # 122
A data engineer is configuring Amazon SageMaker Studio to use AWS Glue interactive sessions to prepare data for machine learning (ML) models.
The data engineer receives an access denied error when the data engineer tries to prepare the data by using SageMaker Studio.
Which change should the engineer make to gain access to SageMaker Studio?

Answer: A

Explanation:
This solution meets the requirement of gaining access to SageMaker Studio to use AWS Glue interactive sessions. AWS Glue interactive sessions are a way to use AWS Glue DataBrew and AWS Glue Data Catalog from within SageMaker Studio. To use AWS Glue interactive sessions, the data engineer's IAM user needs to have permissions to assume the AWS Glue service role and the SageMaker execution role. By adding a policy to the data engineer's IAM user that includes the sts:AssumeRole action for the AWS Glue and SageMaker service principals in the trust policy, the data engineer can grant these permissions and avoid the access denied error. The other options are not sufficient or necessary to resolve the error. Reference:
Get started with data integration from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue interactive sessions Troubleshoot Errors - Amazon SageMaker AccessDeniedException on sagemaker:CreateDomain in AWS SageMaker Studio, despite having SageMakerFullAccess


NEW QUESTION # 123
A company maintains multiple extract, transform, and load (ETL) workflows that ingest data from the company's operational databases into an Amazon S3 based data lake. The ETL workflows use AWS Glue and Amazon EMR to process data.
The company wants to improve the existing architecture to provide automated orchestration and to require minimal manual effort.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Answer: D

Explanation:
AWS Glue workflows are a feature of AWS Glue that enable you to create and visualize complex ETL pipelines using AWS Glue components, such as crawlers, jobs, triggers, and development endpoints. AWS Glue workflows provide automated orchestration and require minimal manual effort, as they handle dependency resolution, error handling, state management, and resource allocation for your ETL workflows.
You can use AWS Glue workflows to ingest data from your operational databases into your Amazon S3 based data lake, and then use AWS Glue and Amazon EMR to process the data in the data lake. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it leverages the serverless and fully managed nature of AWS Glue, and the scalability and flexibility of Amazon EMR12.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
* B. AWS Step Functions tasks. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use AWS Step Functions tasks to invoke AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Step Functions state machines to define the logic and flow of your workflows. However, this option would require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write JSON code to define your state machines, handle errors and retries, and monitor the execution history and status of your workflows3.
* C. AWS Lambda functions. AWS Lambda is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use AWS Lambda functions to trigger AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Lambda event sources and destinations to orchestrate the flow of your workflows. However, this option would also require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write code to implement your business logic, handle errors and retries, and monitor the invocation and execution of your Lambda functions. Moreover, AWS Lambda functions have limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which may affect the performance and scalability of your ETL workflows.
* D. Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) workflows. Amazon MWAA is a managed service that makes it easy to run open source Apache Airflow on AWS. Apache Airflow is a popular tool for creating and managing complex ETL pipelines using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).
You can use Amazon MWAA workflows to orchestrate AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use the Airflow web interface to visualize and monitor your workflows.
However, this option would have more operational overhead than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to set up and configure your Amazon MWAA environment, write Python code to define your DAGs, and manage the dependencies and versions of your Airflow plugins and operators.
1: AWS Glue Workflows
2: AWS Glue and Amazon EMR
3: AWS Step Functions
4: AWS Lambda
5: Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow


NEW QUESTION # 124
A mobile gaming company wants to capture data from its gaming app. The company wants to make the data available to three internal consumers of the data. The data records are approximately 20 KB in size.
The company wants to achieve optimal throughput from each device that runs the gaming app. Additionally, the company wants to develop an application to process data streams. The stream-processing application must have dedicated throughput for each internal consumer.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

Answer: D

Explanation:
Problem Analysis:
Input Requirements: Gaming app generates approximately 20 KB data records, which must be ingested and made available to three internal consumers with dedicated throughput.
Key Requirements:
High throughput for ingestion from each device.
Dedicated processing bandwidth for each consumer.
Key Considerations:
Amazon Kinesis Data Streams supports high-throughput ingestion with PutRecords API for batch writes.
The Enhanced Fan-Out feature provides dedicated throughput to each consumer, avoiding bandwidth contention.
This solution avoids bottlenecks and ensures optimal throughput for the gaming application and consumers.
Solution Analysis:
Option A: Kinesis Data Streams + Enhanced Fan-Out
PutRecords API is designed for batch writes, improving ingestion performance.
Enhanced Fan-Out allows each consumer to process the stream independently with dedicated throughput.
Option B: Data Firehose + Dedicated Throughput Request
Firehose is not designed for real-time stream processing or fan-out. It delivers data to destinations like S3, Redshift, or OpenSearch, not multiple independent consumers.
Option C: Data Firehose + Enhanced Fan-Out
Firehose does not support enhanced fan-out. This option is invalid.
Option D: Kinesis Data Streams + EC2 Instances
Hosting stream-processing applications on EC2 increases operational overhead compared to native enhanced fan-out.
Final Recommendation:
Use Kinesis Data Streams with Enhanced Fan-Out for high-throughput ingestion and dedicated consumer bandwidth.
Reference:
Kinesis Data Streams Enhanced Fan-Out
PutRecords API for Batch Writes


NEW QUESTION # 125
......

Our Data-Engineer-Associate study guide is carefully edited and reviewed by our experts. The design of the content conforms to the examination outline and its key points. Through the practice of our Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions, you can grasp the intention of the examination organization accurately. And we also have the Software version of our Data-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials that can simulate the real exam which can help you better adapt to the real exam.

Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Answers: https://www.topexamcollection.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-vce-collection.html

BONUS!!! Download part of TopExamCollection Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Y-wYGzGs8vj1rntjL3NX3iied8VYEIEF