DumpsActual has designed AZ-802 pdf dumps format that is easy to use. Anyone can download Microsoft AZ-802 pdf questions file and use it from any location or at any time. Microsoft PDF Questions files can be used on laptops, tablets, and smartphones. Moreover, you will get actual Microsoft AZ-802 Exam Questions in this Microsoft AZ-802 pdf dumps file.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Hybrid infrastructure management | - Monitoring and update management
|
| Networking and high availability | - Networking infrastructure
|
| Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Storage and file services
|
| Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Identity and access management
|
>> AZ-802 New Cram Materials <<
Our AZ-802 actual exam are scientific and efficient learning system for a variety of professional knowledge that is recognized by many industry experts. We have carried out the reforms according to the development of the digital devices not only on the content of our AZ-802 Exam Dumps, but also on the layouts since we provide the latest and precise AZ-802 information to our customers, so there is no doubt we will apply the most modern technologies to benefit our customers.
NEW QUESTION # 208
Your on-premises network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain. The domain contains 100 servers that run Windows Server and are Azure Arc-enabled. You have an Azure subscription.
You need to automatically change the password for the built-in local administrator account on each computer in the domain. The solution must meet the following requirements: the password must change automatically every 30 days; administrative effort must be minimized. What should you use?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Windows Local Administrator Password Solution (Windows LAPS) is purpose-built to automatically randomize and rotate the password of a managed local account, such as the built-in local Administrator account, on a configurable schedule that includes a 30-day rotation interval, all with essentially no ongoing administrative effort once policy is applied. Because the 100 servers are already Azure Arc-enabled, Windows LAPS can be configured and enforced through Azure Policy against the Arc-enabled machine resources in addition to the traditional Group Policy path used for domain-joined, non-Arc computers, letting a single policy definition cover the whole hybrid estate with minimal ongoing effort. A Password Settings Object only governs domain user account password policy, such as complexity and expiration for AD DS user accounts, and has no effect whatsoever on local accounts on member servers. An Azure policy alone, without Windows LAPS, does not perform the actual password rotation; it can only audit or enforce that LAPS itself is deployed and configured correctly. Group managed service accounts are an entirely different mechanism designed to provide automatically managed passwords for services and scheduled tasks running under a shared identity, not for a computer ' s built-in local administrator account, so they cannot satisfy this requirement.
NEW QUESTION # 209
You have a disaggregated cluster deployment. The deployment contains a scale-out file server (SOFS) cluster that runs Windows Server and a compute cluster that has the Hyper-V role enabled. You need to implement Storage Quality of Service (QoS). The solution must ensure that you can control the bandwidth usage between the SOFS cluster and the Hyper-V cluster. Which cmdlet should you run on each cluster? To answer, drag the appropriate cmdlets to the correct clusters. Each cmdlet may be used once, more than once, or not at all.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
SOFS: New-StorageQosPolicy; Hyper-V: Set-VMHardDiskDrive
In a disaggregated deployment, storage (the Scale-Out File Server cluster) and compute (the Hyper-V cluster) are separate clusters, and centralized Storage QoS is the supported mechanism for governing and capping the bandwidth/IOPS that VM virtual hard disks consume against that shared SOFS storage. The centralized Storage QoS policy itself -- defining minimum and/or maximum IOPS or throughput limits -- is created on the SOFS cluster using New-StorageQosPolicy; because policies are stored on the file server cluster, they can be referenced by any VM accessing CSV shares exposed by that SOFS, regardless of which Hyper-V host in the compute cluster the VM happens to run on. To actually apply a given policy to a specific VM ' s virtual hard disk, you run Set-VMHardDiskDrive on the Hyper-V cluster side, specifying the QoS policy (by - QoSPolicyID or -QoSPolicyName) on the VM ' s virtual disk attachment; the disk ' s I/O is then governed by that policy ' s bandwidth constraints regardless of Hyper-V host placement within the compute cluster. Set- VMSan is unrelated to Storage QoS; it configures Hyper-V Virtual SAN/Fibre Channel connectivity for guest clustering scenarios and plays no role in bandwidth governance between SOFS and Hyper-V clusters.
Therefore, the correct pairing is New-StorageQosPolicy on the SOFS cluster (to define the policy) and Set- VMHardDiskDrive on the Hyper-V cluster (to apply it to VM disks).
NEW QUESTION # 210
You have a Hyper-V host named Server1 that runs Windows Server. Server1 hosts a virtual machine named VM1 that runs Windows Server and has multiple file shares. You have an Azure subscription. You need to migrate the file shares to Azure Storage by using Azure Storage Mover. The solution must minimize downtime and administrative effort. What should you do on the on-premises network first?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Storage Mover uses a purpose-built migration agent that is deployed as its own dedicated virtual machine on the on-premises hypervisor rather than as software layered onto an existing guest operating system, so for a Hyper-V environment the correct first step is to download the agent ' s VHD image from the Storage Mover resource in Azure and use it to create a new, separate agent virtual machine on the Hyper-V host, Server1, that hosts the source VM whose file shares need migrating. Once that agent VM is powered on and registered against the Storage Mover resource using an activation key generated in the portal, it can enumerate and transfer the file shares hosted on VM1 with minimal ongoing administration, running the actual copy jobs in the background while VM1 continues serving those shares, and without installing any agent software inside VM1 itself. This approach differs from Azure Migrate ' s Connected Machine agent, which is used for a different assessment-and-lift-and-shift migration workflow that projects on-premises machines into Azure as Azure Arc resources rather than for file-share transfer through Storage Mover, and installing it on either VM1 or Server1 would not accomplish the file-share migration the scenario requires.
NEW QUESTION # 211
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest. You need to deploy a Storage Spaces Direct converged infrastructure. The solution must meet the following requirements: -- Use an Ethernet fabric. -- Eliminate the need for Data Center Bridging (DCB). Which Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) networking technology should you implement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
iWARP (Internet Wide Area RDMA Protocol) implements RDMA on top of standard TCP/IP, which allows it to operate over an ordinary, lossy Ethernet fabric without requiring Data Center Bridging or Priority Flow Control to guarantee lossless delivery of RDMA traffic. This is fundamentally different from RoCE (RDMA over Converged Ethernet), in either its v1 or v2 form, both of which depend on a DCB-configured, lossless Ethernet fabric to operate reliably, since RoCE has no built-in congestion or loss-recovery mechanism of its own and instead relies on the underlying network to guarantee lossless delivery. InfiniBand is excluded outright because it is not an Ethernet-based fabric at all, and the requirement explicitly calls for an Ethernet fabric. Because the deployment must use Ethernet while specifically eliminating the DCB dependency that both RoCEv1 and RoCEv2 require, iWARP is the only RDMA technology among the options that satisfies both stated requirements simultaneously for the Storage Spaces Direct converged infrastructure deployment.
NEW QUESTION # 212
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network. You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following exhibit (Server1/Montreal/10.
0.1.10/contoso.local, Server2/Toronto/10.0.2.10/east.contoso.local, Server3/Seattle/10.0.3.10/west.contoso.
local). The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints. You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts. Solution: On Server2 and Server3, you configure a conditional forwarder for contoso.local. Does this meet the goal?
Server1 (Montreal, 10.0.1.10, contoso.local) / Server2 (Toronto, 10.0.2.10, east.contoso.local) / Server3 (Seattle, 10.0.3.10, west.contoso.local); contoso.local delegates east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Windows DNS Server evaluates conditional forwarders using longest-suffix matching, so a conditional forwarder configured for the domain contoso.local also catches queries for names under that suffix, including the delegated child namespaces east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local, when no more specific conditional forwarder exists for those subdomains. Pointing that conditional forwarder at Server1 (10.0.1.10) lets Server2 and Server3 hand off any query for the contoso.local namespace - their own local zone ' s parent, the sibling zone, and the delegated zones alike - to a server that is authoritative for contoso.local and holds the NS delegation records needed to chase down answers in east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local. Internet name resolution is unaffected by this change: the scenario states that all the DNS servers already use root hints, and a conditional forwarder scoped to contoso.local has no effect on queries for names outside that suffix, so Server2 and Server3 continue to resolve internet hosts directly through their existing root hints exactly as before. Because the combination of the pre-existing root hints (internet hosts) and the new conditional forwarder (the full internal contoso.local namespace, including both delegated child zones) covers every namespace the requirement asks for, this solution meets the stated goal.
NEW QUESTION # 213
......
Aspiring Microsoft professionals strive to excel in Microsoft AZ-802 exams such as the Administering Windows Server (AZ-802) to achieve their dream careers. However, passing the AZ-802 Exam can be challenging, especially with a demanding schedule that leaves little time for preparation.
AZ-802 Test Registration: https://www.dumpsactual.com/AZ-802-actualtests-dumps.html