What's more, part of that FreePdfDump Data-Engineer-Associate dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=133IA35OzJkNgiIdqXZ1tbMUXil84ZLdc
The AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) certification exam offers you a unique opportunity to learn new in-demand skills and knowledge. By doing this you can stay competitive and updated in the market. There are other several Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate certification exam benefits that you can gain after passing the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam. Are ready to add the Data-Engineer-Associate certification to your resume? Looking for the proven, easiest and quick way to pass the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam? If you are then you do not need to go anywhere. Just download the Data-Engineer-Associate Questions and start AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam preparation today.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Ensure data encryption
|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Manage and troubleshoot data processes
|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Perform data ingestion
|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Understand data cataloging
|
>> Accurate Data-Engineer-Associate Answers <<
What is more, some after-sales services behave indifferently towards exam candidates who eager to get success, our Data-Engineer-Associate practice materials are on the opposite of it. So just set out undeterred with our Data-Engineer-Associate practice materials, These Data-Engineer-Associate practice materials win honor for our company, and we treat it as our utmost privilege to help you achieve your goal. Our Data-Engineer-Associate practice materials are made by our responsible company which means you can gain many other benefits as well.
NEW QUESTION # 171
A data engineer must build an extract, transform, and load (ETL) pipeline to process and load data from 10 source systems into 10 tables that are in an Amazon Redshift database. All the source systems generate .csv, JSON, or Apache Parquet files every 15 minutes. The source systems all deliver files into one Amazon S3 bucket. The file sizes range from 10 MB to 20 GB. The ETL pipeline must function correctly despite changes to the data schema.
Which data pipeline solutions will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
Using an Amazon EventBridge rule to run an AWS Glue job or invoke an AWS Glue workflow job every 15 minutes are two possible solutions that will meet the requirements. AWS Glue is a serverless ETL service that can process and load data from various sources to various targets, including Amazon Redshift. AWS Glue can handle different data formats, such as CSV, JSON, and Parquet, and also support schema evolution, meaning it can adapt to changes in the data schema over time. AWS Glue can also leverage Apache Spark to perform distributed processing and transformation of large datasets. AWS Glue integrates with Amazon EventBridge, which is a serverless event bus service that can trigger actions based on rules and schedules. By using an Amazon EventBridge rule, you can invoke an AWS Glue job or workflow every 15 minutes, and configure the job or workflow to run an AWS Glue crawler and then load the data into the Amazon Redshift tables. This way, you can build a cost-effective and scalable ETL pipeline that can handle data from 10 source systems and function correctly despite changes to the data schema.
The other options are not solutions that will meet the requirements. Option C, configuring an AWS Lambda function to invoke an AWS Glue crawler when a file is loaded into the S3 bucket, and creating a second Lambda function to run the AWS Glue job, is not a feasible solution, as it would require a lot of Lambda invocations andcoordination. AWS Lambda has some limits on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which can affect the performance and reliability of the ETL pipeline. Option D, configuring an AWS Lambda function to invoke an AWS Glue workflow when a file is loaded into the S3 bucket, is not a necessary solution, as you can use an Amazon EventBridge rule to invoke the AWS Glue workflow directly, without the need for a Lambda function. Option E, configuring an AWS Lambda function to invoke an AWS Glue job when a file is loaded into the S3 bucket, and configuring the AWS Glue job to put smaller partitions of the DataFrame into an Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream, is not a cost-effective solution, as it would incur additional costs for Lambda invocations and data delivery. Moreover, using Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to load data into Amazon Redshift is not suitable for frequent and small batches of data, as it can cause performance issues and data fragmentation. References:
AWS Glue
Amazon EventBridge
Using AWS Glue to run ETL jobs against non-native JDBC data sources
[AWS Lambda quotas]
[Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose quotas]
NEW QUESTION # 172
A company stores daily records of the financial performance of investment portfolios in .csv format in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer uses AWS Glue crawlers to crawl the S3 data.
The data engineer must make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
To make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, the data engineer needs to create a crawler that can crawl the S3 data and write the metadata to the Data Catalog. The crawler also needs to run on a daily schedule to keep the Data Catalog updated with the latest data. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
* Create an IAM role that has the necessary permissions to access the S3 data and the Data Catalog. The AWSGlueServiceRole policy is a managed policy that grants these permissions1.
* Associate the role with the crawler.
* Specify the S3 bucket path of the source data as the crawler's data store. The crawler will scan the data and infer the schema and format2.
* Create a daily schedule to run the crawler. The crawler will run at the specified time every day and update the Data Catalog with any changes in the data3.
* Specify a database name for the output. The crawler will create or update a table in the Data Catalog under the specified database. The table will contain the metadata about the data in the S3 bucket, such as the location, schema, and classification.
Option B is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket. This is unnecessary and may cause confusion, as the crawler does not write any data to the S3 bucket, only metadata to the Data Catalog.
Option C is incorrect because it allocates data processing units (DPUs) to run the crawler every day. This is also unnecessary, as DPUs are only used for AWS Glue ETL jobs, not crawlers.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and C. It configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket and allocates DPUs to run the crawler every day, both of which are irrelevant for the crawler.
References:
* 1: AWS managed (predefined) policies for AWS Glue - AWS Glue
* 2: Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue - AWS Glue
* 3: Scheduling an AWS Glue crawler - AWS Glue
* [4]: Parameters set on Data Catalog tables by crawler - AWS Glue
* [5]: AWS Glue pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 173
A company's data engineer needs to optimize the performance of table SQL queries. The company stores data in an Amazon Redshift cluster. The data engineer cannot increase the size of the cluster because of budget constraints.
The company stores the data in multiple tables and loads the data by using the EVEN distribution style. Some tables are hundreds of gigabytes in size. Other tables are less than 10 MB in size.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
This solution meets the requirements of optimizing the performance of table SQL queries without increasing the size of the cluster. By using the ALL distribution style for rarely updated small tables, you can ensure that the entire table is copied to every node in the cluster, which eliminates the need for data redistribution during joins. This can improve query performance significantly, especially for frequently joined dimension tables.
However, using the ALL distribution style also increases the storage space and the load time, so it is only suitable for small tables that are not updated frequently or extensively. By specifying primary and foreign keys for all tables, you can help the query optimizer to generate better query plans and avoid unnecessary scans or joins. You can also use the AUTO distribution style to let Amazon Redshift choose the optimal distribution style based on the table size and the query patterns. References:
* Choose the best distribution style
* Distribution styles
* Working with data distribution styles
NEW QUESTION # 174
A data engineer needs to create an AWS Lambda function that converts the format of data from .csv to Apache Parquet. The Lambda function must run only if a user uploads a .csv file to an Amazon S3 bucket.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Option A is the correct answer because it meets the requirements with the least operational overhead. Creating an S3 event notification that has an event type of s3:ObjectCreated:* will trigger the Lambda function whenever a new object is created in the S3 bucket. Using a filter rule to generate notifications only when the suffix includes .csv will ensure that the Lambda function only runs for .csv files. Setting the ARN of the Lambda function as the destination for the event notification will directly invoke the Lambda function without any additional steps.
Option B is incorrect because it requires the user to tag the objects with .csv, which adds an extra step and increases the operational overhead.
Option C is incorrect because it uses an event type of s3:*, which will trigger the Lambda function for any S3 event, not just object creation. This could result in unnecessary invocations and increased costs.
Option D is incorrect because it involves creating and subscribing to an SNS topic, which adds an extra layer of complexity and operational overhead.
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation, Section 3.2: S3 Event Notifications and Lambda Functions, Pages 67-69 Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 4: Data Transformation, Lesson 4.2: AWS Lambda, Pages 4-8 AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Lambda Developer Guide, Working with AWS Lambda Functions, Configuring Function Triggers, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3, Pages 1-5
NEW QUESTION # 175
A company uses Amazon S3 to store semi-structured data in a transactional data lake. Some of the data files are small, but other data files are tens of terabytes.
A data engineer must perform a change data capture (CDC) operation to identify changed data from the data source. The data source sends a full snapshot as a JSON file every day and ingests the changed data into the data lake.
Which solution will capture the changed data MOST cost-effectively?
Answer: D
Explanation:
An open source data lake format, such as Apache Parquet, Apache ORC, or Delta Lake, is a cost-effective way to perform a change data capture (CDC) operation on semi-structured data stored in Amazon S3. An open source data lake format allows you to query data directly from S3 using standard SQL, without the need to move or copy data to another service. An open source data lake format also supports schema evolution, meaning it can handle changes in the data structure over time. An open source data lake format also supports upserts, meaning it can insert new data and update existing data in the same operation, using a merge command. This way, you can efficiently capture the changes from the data source and apply them to the S3 data lake, without duplicating or losing any data.
The other options are not as cost-effective as using an open source data lake format, as they involve additional steps or costs. Option A requires you to create and maintain an AWS Lambda function, which can be complex and error-prone. AWS Lambda also has some limits on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which can affect the performance and reliability of the CDC operation. Option B and D require you to ingest the data into a relational database service, such as Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora, which can be expensive and unnecessary for semi-structured data. AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can write the changed data to the data lake, but it also charges you for the data replication and transfer. Additionally, AWS DMS does not support JSON as a source data type, so you would need to convert the data to a supported format before using AWS DMS. References:
* What is a data lake?
* Choosing a data format for your data lake
* Using the MERGE INTO command in Delta Lake
* [AWS Lambda quotas]
* [AWS Database Migration Service quotas]
NEW QUESTION # 176
......
The web-based format gives results at the end of every Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate practice test attempt and points the mistakes so you can get rid of them before the final attempt. This online format of the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice exam works well with Android, Mac, Windows, iOS, and Linux operating systems.
Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Prep: https://www.freepdfdump.top/Data-Engineer-Associate-valid-torrent.html
What's more, part of that FreePdfDump Data-Engineer-Associate dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=133IA35OzJkNgiIdqXZ1tbMUXil84ZLdc