いま156-590認定試験の過去問問題集や参考書を必要とするでしょう。仕事に忙しいですから、試験の準備をする時間が足りないでしょう。ですから、効率が良い試験156-590参考書が必要です。もちろん、よりよく試験の準備をするように、自分に相応しいツールを選択するのは一番大事なことです。これは試験に合格できるかどうかに関連する大切な問題です。ですから、It-Passportsの156-590問題集を選択してください。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) | 20% | - IPS logging and alerts - IPS architecture and deployment modes - IPS exceptions and whitelisting - IPS policy configuration and tuning - IPS signatures and protections |
| Topic 2: Threat Prevention Overview and Architecture | 10% | - Security Gateway integration with Threat Prevention - Check Point Threat Prevention solution overview - Threat Prevention architecture and components |
| Topic 3: Threat Emulation (SandBlast) | 15% | - Threat Emulation policy configuration - Threat Emulation architecture and deployment - Zero-day threat protection - File emulation process and verdicts |
| Topic 4: Threat Extraction | 10% | - Threat Extraction (Sanboxing) concepts - PDF, Office document, and archive sanitization - Threat Extraction policy configuration |
| Topic 5: Threat Prevention Dashboard and Monitoring | 10% | - Threat Prevention logs and reporting - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues - Threat Prevention statistics and trends - Using SmartConsole for monitoring |
| Topic 6: Threat Prevention Policy | 20% | - Creating and configuring Threat Prevention profiles - Profile-based vs. rule-based configurations - Applying Threat Prevention policy layers - Threat Prevention action settings |
| Topic 7: Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus | 15% | - Bot detection mechanisms - Configuring Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus policies - Anti-Virus scanning methods (streamed vs. traditional) - Bot and malware signature updates |
It-Passportsは最高のハイパスレート156-590トレーニング資料を提供しており、数千人の受験者が試験をクリアして夢のような認定を得るのに役立ちます。認定が傑出しているか重要であるほど、競争は激しくなります。 156-590の実践教材は、あなたが簡単に目立つようにするあなたの勝利の魔法です。 156-590学習ガイドには、効率的な準備に役立つ実際のテストに関する最も重要な知識が含まれています。 100％の合格率を追求する場合、156-590試験の質問と回答は、わずか20〜30時間の学習で確実にクリアするのに役立ちます。
質問 # 24
Which is NOT a rating used in IPS Protection selection/activation?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is B. CPU Utilization . IPS protection selection and activation are based on protection metadata and profile criteria, not a direct CPU-utilization rating. The official Threat Prevention guide states that a Threat Prevention profile activates protections according to factors including performance impact of the protection , severity of the threat , confidence that a protection can correctly identify an attack , and settings specific to the Software Blade.
The same R81.20 guide shows how the Optimized profile uses these criteria: protections are set to Prevent or Detect based on Confidence Level , Performance Impact , and Severity thresholds. CPU utilization is certainly relevant in performance troubleshooting, capacity planning, and operational monitoring, but it is not one of the IPS protection-selection ratings. In practice, CPU usage is an observed runtime metric, while Performance Impact is the predefined protection attribute used by profiles to decide whether a protection should be active, detect-only, or prevented. This distinction matters in certification: IPS tuning is driven by profile attributes, while CPU utilization is reviewed afterward through monitoring tools such as CPView, logs, and performance diagnostics. Reference topics: IPS Protection ratings, Threat Prevention Profiles, Severity, Confidence Level, Performance Impact, activation criteria.
質問 # 25
Which of the following is NOT a valid Blade bundle?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is B. Next Generation Full Protection . Check Point's documented security subscription package families include NGFW , NGTP , and SNBT/SandBlast . Check Point's 3600 Security Gateway datasheet explicitly lists NGFW , NGTP , and SNBT (SandBlast) as all-inclusive security package columns.
The Network Security Software Bundles datasheet also presents the same package structure: NGFW as the base Next Generation Firewall bundle, NGTP as the Next-Gen Threat Prevention package, and SNBT as the SandBlast package that includes NGTP and adds zero-day protection capabilities.
Therefore, Next Generation Firewall , Next Generation Threat Prevention , and SandBlast are valid Check Point blade bundle names in this context. Next Generation Full Protection is not the documented bundle name. It may sound plausible because it describes a comprehensive security posture, but certification questions require exact product and package terminology. In Check Point licensing and subscription design, using the correct bundle name matters because each package maps to a defined set of Software Blades and subscription entitlements. NGFW provides the base firewall/IPS access-control package, NGTP adds known- threat prevention, and SNBT adds advanced SandBlast zero-day protections such as Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, and Zero Phishing. Reference topics: Check Point Software Blade bundles, NGFW, NGTP, SNBT
/SandBlast, package entitlement mapping.
質問 # 26
Which protection setting is generally the MOST resource intensive?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is B. Prevent . From a performance perspective, the most resource-intensive setting is generally the one that requires the gateway not only to inspect and identify the threat, but also to enforce a blocking decision inline. Prevent mode means the protection is actively applied to traffic and the gateway must make a real-time enforcement decision. Check Point explains that Threat Prevention profiles activate protections based on factors that include the performance impact of the protection , threat severity, confidence level, and blade-specific settings. Check Point's IPS optimization guidance also warns that some protections require more system resources to inspect traffic and recommends focusing on lower-impact protections when reducing gateway resource use is necessary.
By comparison, Inactive is the least intensive because the protection is not enforced. Detect can log or report detection without blocking, which is useful for staging and troubleshooting. Inspect still consumes inspection resources, but Prevent typically represents the highest operational burden because it performs inline analysis and enforcement, and may require buffering, stream handling, packet modification, or connection termination depending on blade and protocol. In real deployments, the exact resource cost also depends on traffic mix, protocol, file size, SSL inspection, protection complexity, and whether traffic remains accelerated. Reference topics: IPS Profile Settings, protection activation, Prevent versus Detect, Performance Impact, IPS optimization.
質問 # 27
Task: Verify if a specific IPS protection is active.
正解：
解説：
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Go to Threat Tools > IPS Protections.
2- Use the filter to search by name or CVE ID.
3- Confirm status is "Active" and assigned to profile.
4- Double-click to view scope and affected profiles.
5- Confirm via SmartConsole logs if it triggered recently.
質問 # 28
Task: Exclude traffic to internal update servers from Anti-Virus scanning.
正解：
解説：
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Open Threat Prevention Policy.
2- Add a rule: Source = Internal Gateway, Destination = AV Server.
3- Assign a profile with AV blade disabled.
4- Set Track = Log and Action = Accept.
5- Place rule before general AV rule, publish, and install.
質問 # 29
......
It-Passports各製品には試用版があり、当社の製品は例外なく、文字通り、156-590準備ガイドのWebサイトを閲覧すると、156-590ガイド急流が無料デモを提供できることを意味します。お客様が事前に当社の製品について理解を深めることができます。さらに、スケジュールよりも前に進んでいる場合は、156-590試験トレントがあなたに適しているかどうかを検討できます。さらに、通常のお客様になると、より多くの会員割引とCheck Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS)優待サービスをお楽しみいただけます。
156-590日本語独学書籍: https://www.it-passports.com/156-590.html