Jeder hat eine Utopie in seinem Herzen. Manchmal macht dieser unzuerfüllende Traum uns traurig. In der Wirklichkeit ist es doch nicht zu erfüllen. Solange Sie geeignete Maßnahmen treffen, ist alles möglich. Sie können doch die Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen. Warum? Weil Sie die Fragenkataloge von DeutschPrüfung haben. Die Fragenpool zur Microsoft AZ-802 Prüfung von DeutschPrüfung sind die besten Fragenpool. Sie sind wegen ihrer hohen Erfolgsquote und Effizienz ganz berühmt. Zugleich können Sie auch viel Kraft ersparen. Mit DeutschPrüfung können Sie die Prüfung ganz einfach bestehen und Ihren Traum verwirklichen. Sie werden mehr Selbstbewusstsein haben, was zum Erfolg führt.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Networking and high availability | - High availability and disaster recovery
|
| Topic 2: Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Virtual machines and containers
|
| Topic 3: Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Security and compliance
|
| Topic 4: Hybrid infrastructure management | - Azure integration
|
Wenn Sie noch viel wertvolle Zeit und Energie für die Vorbereitung der Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifizierungsprüfung benutzen und nicht wissen, wie man mühlos und effizient die Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen kann, bieten jetzt DeutschPrüfung Ihnen eine effektive Methode, um die Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen. Mit DeutschPrüfung würden Sie bessere Resultate bei weniger Einsatz erzielen.
425. Frage
You have a server named Server1 that runs Windows Server and contains three volumes named C, D, and E.
Files are stored on Server1 as shown in the following exhibit: File1 (volume C, 500 KB), File2 (volume D, 10 KB), File3 (volume D, 1 MB). For volume D, Data Deduplication is enabled and set to General purpose file server. You perform the following actions: move File1 to volume D; copy File2 to volume D and name the copy File4; move File3 to volume E. For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true.
Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Antwort:
Begründung:
Explanation:
File1 is deduplicated after the deduplication job runs: Yes. File3 is deduplicated after the deduplication job runs: No. File4 is deduplicated after the deduplication job runs: No.
Data Deduplication only ever processes files that currently reside on a volume where deduplication is enabled, and it also enforces a default minimum file size of 32 KB - files smaller than that are never deduplicated no matter how long they sit on an enabled volume. File1 was moved to volume D, which has deduplication enabled, and at 500 KB it is comfortably above the 32 KB minimum, so once the deduplication job runs, File1 is eligible and will be deduplicated. File3, originally on D, was moved to volume E, which does not have deduplication enabled at all; because File3 no longer resides on D by the time the job runs, it is not deduplicated, and its size (1 MB) is irrelevant since it isn ' t even on a deduplication-enabled volume anymore. File4 is a copy of File2 (10 KB) placed onto volume D under a new name, so it does reside on a deduplication-enabled volume, but at only 10 KB it falls below the mandatory 32 KB minimum file size threshold, so it is excluded from deduplication purely on size grounds regardless of which volume it is on.
Only File1 satisfies both conditions - residing on an enabled volume and meeting the minimum size - so only File1 is deduplicated.
426. Frage
You have an Azure subscription. The subscription contains a virtual machine named VM1 that runs Windows Server and has the following disks: * OS disk: Disk1 -- Size: 512 GiB, Free space: 260 GiB, Encryption: SSE with PMK, Storage type: Standard SSD * Data disk: Disk2 -- Size: 512 GiB, Free space: 45 GiB, Storage type: Standard HDD, Encryption: Platform-managed key You are planning a maintenance strategy for VM1.
You need to identify which task can be performed on Disk2 without causing downtime to VM1. What should you do on Disk2?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Azure managed disks support expanding (increasing) a data disk ' s size without deallocating the VM, and Microsoft ' s documentation confirms this applies to Standard HDD, Standard SSD, and Premium SSD disks as long as the resize stays at or below 4 TiB (crossing the 4 TiB boundary does require deallocating and detaching first; Premium SSD v2 and Ultra Disk have no such restriction at any size). Disk2 is a 512 GiB Standard HDD data disk, well under the 4 TiB threshold, so increasing its size can be performed online, with no VM downtime. Decreasing (shrinking) an Azure managed disk ' s size is never supported at all, with or without downtime, regardless of disk type, due to the risk of data loss -- the only workaround is creating a new, smaller disk and copying the data across, not an in-place shrink. Changing a managed disk ' s encryption type (for example, switching between platform-managed and customer-managed keys) and changing its storage type (for example, from Standard HDD to Premium SSD) are both operations that Microsoft documents as requiring the VM to be stopped/deallocated (and, in many cases, the disk detached) before the change can be applied, since these operations affect how the disk is provisioned and served at the storage layer. Therefore, among the four choices, only increasing Disk2 ' s size can be performed without causing downtime to VM1.
427. Frage
You have a server that runs Windows Server and contains 10 physical disks. You plan to implement storage spaces that will use the disks. You are evaluating whether to configure the following options:
* A two-way mirror
* A parity storage layout
What is the maximum number of disks that can fail without data loss for each option? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Antwort:
Begründung:
Explanation:
Two-way mirror: 1. Parity storage layout: 1.
A two-way mirror keeps exactly two copies of every block of data, regardless of how many total physical disks make up the storage pool; because there are only two copies, a two-way mirror can tolerate the loss of exactly one disk before data becomes unrecoverable -- this maximum tolerance is fixed at one disk no matter whether the pool has 4, 10, or 20 disks. A standard (single) parity storage layout, the default behavior when " Parity " resiliency is selected without explicitly requesting dual parity, computes and stores one parity block per stripe -- conceptually similar to RAID-5 -- which likewise tolerates the loss of exactly one disk regardless of the total disk count, since a single parity block can only reconstruct data lost from one failed disk at a time.
Dual parity, which can tolerate two simultaneous disk failures, is a distinct configuration that must be explicitly requested (for example, via New-VirtualDisk with -PhysicalDiskRedundancy 2) and requires a minimum number of disks (at least 7) to be available -- it is not the default outcome of simply choosing a parity layout with 10 disks on hand. Since the scenario describes a plain " parity storage layout " without specifying dual parity, both the two-way mirror and the parity layout in this comparison tolerate the same maximum of one disk failure before data loss.
428. Frage
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network. You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following exhibit (Server1/Montreal/10.
0.1.10/contoso.local, Server2/Toronto/10.0.2.10/east.contoso.local, Server3/Seattle/10.0.3.10/west.contoso.
local). The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints. You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts. Solution: On Server2, you create a conditional forwarder for contoso.
local and west.contoso.local. On Server3, you create a conditional forwarder for contoso.local and east.
contoso.local. Does this meet the goal?
Server1 (Montreal, 10.0.1.10, contoso.local) / Server2 (Toronto, 10.0.2.10, east.contoso.local) / Server3 (Seattle, 10.0.3.10, west.contoso.local); contoso.local delegates east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local.
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Server2 (east.contoso.local) already answers authoritatively for its own zone, so it only needs help reaching the parent zone and the sibling child zone; the same is true of Server3 (west.contoso.local) in reverse.
Configuring, on Server2, a conditional forwarder for contoso.local (pointed at Server1) covers the parent namespace, and a conditional forwarder for west.contoso.local (pointed at Server3) covers the sibling zone that Server2 does not itself host; together these two entries let Server2 resolve every internal namespace it doesn ' t already hold authoritatively. The mirrored configuration on Server3 - conditional forwarders for contoso.local and for east.contoso.local - gives Server3 the same complete internal coverage from its side.
Internet resolution is untouched by either change, since the scenario already states all three servers use root hints, so internet host names continue to resolve normally through the existing root hints configuration on every server. Because each server ends up able to reach its own zone (authoritative), the parent zone (via a conditional forwarder to Server1), the sibling child zone (via a conditional forwarder to the peer server), and the internet (via root hints), every internal namespace and every internet host is resolvable from Server2 and Server3, so this solution meets the stated goal.
429. Frage
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain. The functional level of the domain is Windows Server 2012 R2. The domain contains an account named Admin1 that is used for only domain administration. You need to secure Admin1 against credential theft. The solution must prevent the domain accounts from using NTLM authentication, credential delegation, and cached offline sign-in. What should you do?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
The Protected Users security group is a domain-level container, available starting at the Windows Server 2012 R2 domain functional level (which this domain already meets), whose members automatically have several credential-protection restrictions enforced on any Windows Server 2012 R2 or later, or Windows 8.1 or later, device they sign in to: NTLM authentication is blocked for the account (it can authenticate only with Kerberos), Kerberos long-term keys are not cached so offline/cached sign-in is not possible, and the account cannot be used as the source of any type of credential delegation (constrained or unconstrained), because its Kerberos TGT is issued without the flags delegation requires. Adding Admin1 to Protected Users therefore achieves all three stated requirements simultaneously with a single configuration change, and no additional GPO settings are required for these specific protections to take effect. An authentication policy that sets a custom TGT lifetime only changes how often the ticket must be renewed; it does nothing to block NTLM, delegation, or cached credentials. Marking the account as sensitive and cannot be delegated only blocks delegation, leaving NTLM use and cached offline sign-in fully possible. Disabling Allow Delegating Default Credentials for privileged workstations is a Credential Guard-related RDP/CredSSP setting scoped to specific client machines, not a domain account attribute, and does not address NTLM or offline caching for Admin1 account-wide.
430. Frage
......
Wir sind der Schnellste, der Prüfungsfragen und Antworten von Microsoft AZ-802 Prüfung erhält. Unser DeutschPrüfung bietet Ihnen die Testfragen und Antworten von Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifizierungsprüfung, die von den IT-Experten durch Experimente und Praxis erhalten werden und über IT-Zertifizierungserfahrungen über 10 Jahre verfügt. DeutschPrüfung verspricht, dass Sie das Microsoft AZ-802 Zertifikat schneller und leichter erhalten, als Sie durch die anderen Webseiten.
AZ-802 PDF Testsoftware: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/AZ-802-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html