ちなみに、JPNTest CCDS-Oの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GU8b1qLUxfjt696Iw3J6CAXpeTL9uB0t
かねてIT認定試験資料を開発する会社として、高品質のACDIS CCDS-O試験資料を提供したり、ビフォワ.アフタサービスに関心を寄せたりしています。我々社の職員は全日であなたのお問い合わせを待っております。何の疑問があると、弊社の職員に連絡して問い合わせます。一年間で更新するなる、第一時間であなたのメールボックスに送ります。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
| トピック 6 |
|
JPNTestのCCDS-O試験問題がこの分野で最も人気があるのはなぜですか？ 一方では、すべてのお客様のフィードバックからの統計によると、CCDS-Oガイドトレントの助けを借りてCCDS-O試験を準備したACDISお客様の合格率は98％toに達しました。 100％。 一方、シミュレーションテストは、CCDS-O試験問題のソフトウェアバージョンで利用できます。これは、CCDS-O試験の雰囲気に慣れるのに役立ちます。 CCDS-OトレントのCertified Clinical Documentation Specialist-Outpatient質問があなたにとって最良の選択であると信じてください。
質問 # 20
A patient receives treatment for diabetes during a primary care visit. He has a glucose level of 240 and A1C of 7.9. The patient is prescribed Gabapentin 100mg TID. Which of the following should the CDI specialist query for?
正解：C
解説：
In outpatient CDI chart review, a key skill is recognizing when medications and treatment plans suggest a specific diabetic complication that is not explicitly documented. Gabapentin is commonly prescribed for neuropathic pain, and in a diabetic patient it is frequently used to treat diabetic peripheral neuropathy symptoms (burning, tingling, numbness, shooting pain). ACDIS outpatient CDI guidance supports querying when there are strong clinical indicators that a more specific, clinically relevant diagnosis may be present and is being treated at the encounter, because diabetes codes require complication specificity when supported (e.g., "diabetes with neuropathy" rather than unspecified diabetes). The elevated glucose and A1C confirm ongoing diabetes management but do not, by themselves, indicate CKD, macular degeneration, or ketoacidosis. Ketoacidosis would require documentation of acute metabolic decompensation and supporting clinical/lab findings, which are not provided here. Therefore, the most appropriate clarification is whether the patient has diabetic peripheral neuropathy (and whether it is painful neuropathy) being managed with gabapentin, so the provider can document the condition clearly and accurately.
質問 # 21
When a CDI specialist identifies a discrepancy in documentation, the next step is to:
正解：D
解説：
CDI staff do not alter the legal health record and should not "code it as is" when documentation is unclear, conflicting, or incomplete in a way that impacts accurate reporting. The compliant next step is to issue a provider query for clarification, ensuring the final record accurately reflects the provider's clinical judgment. ACDIS-guided outpatient CDI emphasizes that queries are a quality and compliance tool: they reconcile discrepancies (e.g., conflicting diagnoses across notes, missing linkage between symptoms and conditions, unclear acuity such as "CHF" without type/status, or ambiguous infection documentation). The query should be supported by clinical indicators from the chart and should ask the provider to document the clarified diagnosis/status in the record (progress note, addendum, or appropriate attestation). Escalation to compliance is reserved for patterns of nonresponse, suspected integrity concerns, or systemic issues, not routine discrepancies. The objective is to achieve a complete, consistent clinical story that supports coding, risk adjustment, quality reporting, and medical necessity-through provider clarification, not CDI edits.
質問 # 22
Which of the following is a provider benefit of a prospective query?
正解：A
解説：
A prospective query is initiated early enough (before or during the visit workflow) so the provider can evaluate, assess, and document the condition in real time while the patient is present. This is a major provider benefit because it supports better clinical accuracy and completeness: the clinician can ask targeted questions, perform relevant exam elements, review results, and determine whether the condition is present, active, being monitored, or ruled out-then document the final clinical impression and plan. From an ACDIS outpatient CDI perspective, prospective querying improves efficiency and reduces retrospective "chart-chasing," late addenda, and documentation gaps that occur when clarification is requested after the encounter is closed. Importantly, prospective queries must remain non-leading and cannot direct the provider to a particular diagnosis (eliminating option A). They also cannot "guarantee" risk-adjusted capture because the diagnosis must be clinically supported and addressed (eliminating option B). Defining the purpose of the encounter is driven by the clinical reason for visit, not by CDI (eliminating option D).
質問 # 23
Which of the following conditions is commonly treated with the medication sertraline?
正解：B
解説：
Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) most commonly used to treat depressive disorders and several anxiety-related conditions. In outpatient chart review, recognizing medication-condition relationships supports accurate problem list maintenance and compliant diagnosis reporting, but the diagnosis must still be clearly documented as assessed/managed at the encounter. Depression is the best match because SSRIs like sertraline are first-line pharmacologic therapy for major depressive disorder and are frequently continued long-term with monitoring for symptom control, side effects, and functional status. Schizophrenia is primarily treated with antipsychotic medications; sertraline may be used only as an adjunct if a comorbid depressive or anxiety disorder is present, so it is not the common primary treatment. Asthma management centers on bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, not SSRIs. Heart failure therapy involves guideline-directed cardiac medications (e.g., beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARNI, diuretics), and sertraline is not a standard heart failure treatment. Outpatient CDI education emphasizes documenting the specific mental health diagnosis, current status (stable/worsening), and treatment plan to support coding.
質問 # 24
In which of the following situations would a yes/no query format be considered compliant?
正解：D
解説：
A yes/no query format is considered compliant when it is used to resolve a clear documentation conflict and the provider is being asked to confirm which statement accurately reflects the patient's condition for that encounter. In these situations, the intent is not to introduce a new diagnosis or steer the provider toward a particular coded outcome, but to reconcile inconsistent information already present in the record (e.g., one clinician documents a condition and another documents the opposite, or different notes describe different statuses). A focused yes/no confirmation can be appropriate because the clinical question is essentially binary: which interpretation is correct. By contrast, obtaining a new diagnosis generally requires an open-ended or multiple-choice format with balanced options (including "unable to determine") and strong encounter-specific indicators to avoid leading. Likewise, organism specification and acuity clarification often involve more than two clinically valid possibilities (different organisms, acute vs chronic vs acute-on-chronic, etc.), making yes/no overly restrictive and potentially leading. Therefore, resolving conflicting documentation is the best fit for a compliant yes/no query.
質問 # 25
......
現代社会では、私たちは毎日忙しいです。したがって、個々の時間は制限されています。事実、あなたが学ぶことを決心したなら、何もあなたを止めることはできません！幸運にも、CCDS-O試験の資料に出会えます。 CCDS-O試験の最短時間で改善できるようにお手伝いします。あなたもCCDS-O試験について何も知りません。全く問題ありません。約20〜30時間のガイダンスを受け入れるだけで、試験に簡単に参加できます。ご覧のとおり、CCDS-O模擬試験はあまり時間をかけません。
CCDS-O受験料過去問: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/CCDS-O-mondaishu
BONUS！！！ JPNTest CCDS-Oダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GU8b1qLUxfjt696Iw3J6CAXpeTL9uB0t