SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization学習クイズの合格率は99％で、SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization実践ガイドは高いヒット率を高めます。当社のSRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimizationテストトレントは専門家によって編集され、Nokia提供される回答と質問は実際の試験に基づいています。SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization試験問題の内容は、理解して習得するのが簡単です。試験の準備を万全にするために、当社のソフトウェアは、実際の試験を刺激する機能と、速度の調整に役立つタイミング機能を提供します。SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimizationガイド急流のこれらのメリットに基づいて、SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization試験に高い確率で合格できます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Interference analysis and mitigation - Capacity optimization strategies - Handover optimization - Load balancing techniques - Parameter tuning best practices - Coverage optimization methods |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN network architecture overview - Single RAN integration principles - SRAN solution components and functions |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Optimization case studies - Root cause analysis methodologies - Common performance issues diagnosis - Network failure identification and resolution |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - KPI definition and measurement - Performance data collection and analysis - Threshold configuration and alerting |
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Report generation and interpretation - Configuration management for optimization - Automated optimization features - Nokia NetAct and performance tools |
>> SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization日本語対策 <<
Nokiaシラバスの変更と理論と実践の最新の開発状況に応じて、SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization試験のブレインダンプが改訂および更新されます。 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization試験トレントは、経験豊富な専門家によって高品質で精巧にまとめられています。 SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimizationガイドの質問の内容は簡単に習得でき、重要な情報を簡素化します。より重要な情報を少ない回答と質問で伝えるため、学習は簡単で効率的です。この言語は理解しやすいため、学習者がSRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization試験に合格して合格するための障害はありません。
質問 # 15
The CB009425 feature provides several enhancements to improve the transmission link budget for VoNR, offering a better customer experience. Which statements are correct regarding this feature?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is D.
The feature is focused on improving VoNR link robustness and user experience, especially near the cell edge or in difficult RF conditions. VoNR is sensitive to packet loss, delay, and uplink coverage limitations.
Therefore, link-budget improvement features commonly target BLER behavior, transport block sizing, and MCS robustness.
Statement A is correct because minimizing Packet Loss Rate, or PLR, directly improves VoNR speech quality and reduces mute, clipping, or robotic voice effects.
Statement B is correct because VoNR bearers can use specific initial BLER targets. A more suitable BLER target helps the scheduler choose a more robust MCS for voice traffic.
Statement C is correct because a configurable uplink minimum TBS, or Transport Block Size, helps ensure that small VoNR packets are transmitted efficiently and reliably.
Statement D is correct because MCS downgrade control can improve robustness by selecting a more conservative modulation and coding scheme for VoNR DRBs when radio conditions require it.
Therefore, all listed enhancements are part of the VoNR link-budget improvement concept:
A, B, C, and D.
質問 # 16
Which of the following statements does not apply to mmWave radio propagation ?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is C .
At mmWave / FR2 frequencies , radio propagation is more challenging than in low-band or mid-band spectrum. Diffraction becomes weaker, blockage is more severe, foliage attenuation is high, and building penetration loss is significant. This is why mmWave networks usually require dense site grids, line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight paths, and strong beamforming. Industry mmWave references consistently describe high path loss, high penetration loss, and the need for directional antenna systems to compensate for these losses.
Option C does not apply because water absorption and atmospheric absorption generally become more relevant at higher frequencies, not lower. Rain, humidity, and oxygen/water-vapor absorption are important considerations for mmWave link budgets.
So the statement that does not apply to mmWave propagation is:
Low water absorption at high frequencies.
質問 # 17
In the case of 5G SA, which of the following triggers the Radio Link Failure, or RLF, handling mechanism?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is C.
In 5G SA, Radio Link Failure handling is mainly UE-driven. The UE monitors the radio link quality using lower-layer indications such as in-sync and out-of-sync indications. If the UE receives enough out-of-sync indications, it starts the relevant RLF timer, commonly associated with T310 behavior. If the link does not recover before the timer expires, the UE declares Radio Link Failure and starts recovery, such as RRC re- establishment.
The gNodeB can detect uplink problems and may release or reconfigure the UE, but the classical RLF handling mechanism is triggered at the UE side.
So the correct answer is:
UE indication timer only.
質問 # 18
Which statement is not true about MantaRay SON ?
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is B .
The statement "Energy savings management is not covered" is not true . Nokia describes MantaRay SON as supporting radio network performance, quality, and energy efficiency optimization. Nokia also references AI-powered energy savings management and RAN energy efficiency use cases under its SON/MantaRay automation portfolio.
The other statements are aligned with Nokia SON/MantaRay positioning. Nokia describes MantaRay SON as an automation layer within the MantaRay SMO framework, with support for multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality and an application ecosystem. Nokia also has historical EdenNet SON material, including EdenNet SON Energy Saving Management.
Therefore, the statement that is not true is:
Energy savings management is not covered.
質問 # 19
In the context of mmWave deployments , what is the primary benefit of analog beamforming ?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is A .
In mmWave systems, beamforming is essential because FR2 signals suffer from high path loss and blockage.
Analog beamforming uses fewer RF chains than fully digital beamforming, so it is cheaper and less complex in terms of RF hardware, power consumption, and implementation. Research and industry references explain that analog and hybrid beamforming architectures reduce the number of required ADCs/RF chains compared with fully digital beamforming, lowering cost and power complexity.
However, analog beamforming has limitations. It usually forms one beam, or a limited number of beams, at a time from a panel. Supporting multiple independent simultaneous beams and more UEs per sector is more associated with digital or hybrid beamforming, not pure analog beamforming.
Therefore, the primary benefit is:
Low cost and low complexity for coverage at higher mmWave bands.
質問 # 20
......
現在の仕事と現在の生活に飽きていますか？ 便利な証明書を入手してください！ SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization学習ガイドは、目標を達成するのに役立つ最高の製品です。 試験に合格し、SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization学習教材で認定を取得すると、大企業で満足のいく仕事に応募し、高い給与と高い利益で上級職に就くことができます。 優れたNokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimizationスタディガイドにより、受験者は、余分な時間とエネルギーを無駄にせずに効率的にテストを準備するための明確な学習方向を得ることができます。
SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization対応内容: https://www.jpexam.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization_exam.html