P.S. Free & New VNX301 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by iPassleader: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m-kZ8ToGK8ble19aWKCGLuXERoVBR4TX
By keeping minimizing weak points and maiming strong points, our Versa Networks VNX301 exam materials are nearly perfect for you to choose. As a brand now, many companies strive to get our Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist (VNX300) VNX301 practice materials to help their staffs achieve more certifications for our quality and accuracy.
| Certification Vendor: | Versa Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist |
| Exam Number: | VNX301 |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Related Certifications: | Versa Certified SD-WAN Expert |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Select |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Price: | USD 250 |
| Exam Duration: | 90 minutes |
| Sample Questions: | Versa Networks VNX301 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored exam at Pearson VUE test centers |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended: Basic networking knowledge (CCNA/equivalent), familiarity with WAN technologies and enterprise network design |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.versa-networks.com/partners/training-certification.html |
A lot of applicants have studied with Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist (VNX300) (VNX301) practice material and passed the VNX301 exam on the first try with their hard work and consistency. The iPassleader assures the customers that they will pass the VNX301 Exam on the first try by studying from VNX301 exam material and if they fail to do it so they can claim their money back (terms and conditions apply). Buy It Now!
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 38
A VOS branch has two WAN circuits. You suspect the configured transport domain mapping is wrong because one link is not building the expected SD-WAN path. Which VSM control-plane command is most useful to check local WAN circuit information, transport domains, NAT status, and local tunnel-site details?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Versa SD-WAN data-path troubleshooting documentation instructs administrators to connect to the VSM control plane with vsh connect vsmd and then use show vsm p2mp local-tunnel-sites 0 to check the status of local site objects. The example output includes the local site key, neighbor IP, site type, site name, branch ID, tenant ID, and detailed WAN link information. It also shows fields such as WAN local VRF ID, WAN local link name, circuit information, link ID, behind-NAT status, shaping rate, public and private addresses, link flags, transport domain, and SLA interval.
This command is therefore highly relevant when validating whether the local SD-WAN site has learned and built the correct WAN transport objects for overlay tunnel creation. If a circuit is mapped to the wrong transport domain or has incorrect NAT/public/private address state, the local-tunnel-site output is one of the best places to confirm it.
The other commands are useful for software version, CGNAT summary, or CPU usage, but they do not show the detailed SD-WAN local tunnel-site transport mapping.
NEW QUESTION # 39
During branch onboarding, you need to verify whether the Controller has sent branch-connect and branch- disconnect notifications to Versa Director. Which CLI command should be used?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Versa troubleshooting documentation states that after a branch device successfully establishes an IPsec connection to the Controller node, the Controller sends a notification to the Director node. To display the details of this notification, the documentation instructs administrators to issue the show alarms CLI command. It also provides examples using show alarms | match branchd | match br101 to view branch-connect and branch-disconnect events.
These alarm entries are valuable during onboarding because they show whether the branch reached the Controller, whether staging progressed, and whether the branch later disconnected. For example, branch lifecycle notifications include factory-default connection, staged connection, Stage 3 connection with WAN IP addresses, and branch disconnect events.
show system storage is useful for disk usage, show interfaces detail helps with link state, speed, duplex, and interface counters, and show cgnat acl info is used for CGNAT matching. None of those commands directly confirms branch lifecycle notifications between Controller and Director.
NEW QUESTION # 40
Examine the exhibit below.
You are configuring an IPsec tunnel towards a non-SD-WAN site over the INETTransport-VR. The site IP address is 10.1.1.1. This tunnel is for traffic between the 192.168.100.0/24 and the 192.168.200.0/24 LAN networks. The tunnel does not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows that the IPsec VPN is being configured with Tunnel Routing Instance: XIAN-Control-VR . However, the question states that the tunnel is toward a non-SD-WAN site over the INET-Transport-VR . For a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, the tunnel routing instance must match the routing instance used to reach the peer public IP address. In this case, the remote non-SD-WAN peer is
10.1.1.1 , and the intended underlay transport is INET-Transport-VR , not the Control VR.
Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that routing instances are used to define where traffic is sourced and forwarded. For example, configuration examples select routing instances when enabling services or initiating tests, and traffic must use the correct WAN or transport routing instance to reach the remote endpoint. Versa branch troubleshooting also emphasizes that after transport connectivity is available, the branch establishes IKE-based IPsec connectivity; if that connectivity fails, the IPsec-related interface remains down.
Changing the routing instance to global would not be correct because the intended path is specifically INET-Transport-VR. A higher precedence value is not required to establish the tunnel. The policy selector shown already defines local-to-remote interesting traffic, and the key failure is the incorrect tunnel routing instance.
NEW QUESTION # 41
Examine the exhibit below.
You are onboarding the SOLDEU-R2 branch device using the staging script. You cannot get a Versa- Provider-Controller-VR IP address assigned, indicating that the IPsec tunnel to the corrector has not come up.
You verified that the cables have been connected to the correct ports.
What has caused this issue?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The issue is caused by specifying the incorrect WAN port in the staging script. In the exhibit, the SOLDEU- R2 branch is physically connected to the Internet cloud through vni-0/0 , while vni-0/1 is shown as the inter- device link toward SOLDEU-R1. However, the show interfaces brief output shows that the WAN IP address
192.168.122.121/24 has been assigned to vni-0/1.0 , not to the Internet-facing interface. Since the cables are confirmed to be connected correctly, the mismatch must be in the staging script interface selection, not in the cabling.
Versa documentation states that during SD-WAN staging, the branch establishes an IKE session with the Controller, and after that the Controller assigns an IP address to the branch device. Versa troubleshooting guidance also states that after transport connectivity to the Controller is established, the branch forms IKE-based IPsec connectivity, and if this succeeds, the ptvi interface toward the Controller comes up. If IKE/IPsec fails, the ptvi interface remains down. Because the staged WAN IP is placed on the wrong VNI interface, the branch cannot reach the Controller over the intended Internet transport, so the Controller tunnel does not come up.
NEW QUESTION # 42
Examine the CLI output in the exhibit.
You are reviewing the OSPF adjacency on a VOS CPE, and the output is shown in the exhibit. In this scenario, what is the probable cause of the OSPF adjacency issue?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as "exchange start," followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.
Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart.
Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.
NEW QUESTION # 43
......
VNX301 Real Torrent: https://www.ipassleader.com/Versa-Networks/VNX301-practice-exam-dumps.html
What's more, part of that iPassleader VNX301 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m-kZ8ToGK8ble19aWKCGLuXERoVBR4TX