ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Trainingsmaterialien: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Lernmittel & PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Quiz

P.S. Kostenlose und neue ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von DeutschPrüfung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1R0z7yRNnr1wdzJqIQ88VvAJkIA4jyhdZ

Die Fragenkataloge von DeutschPrüfung enthalten die Lernmaterialien und Simulationsfragen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung. Noch wichtiger bieten wir die originalen ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Fragen Und Antworten.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Weight	Objectives
Fundamental Concepts of Information Security	15%	- Overview of ISO/IEC 27000 family of standards 1. Relationship between ISO/IEC 27001 and other standards 2. Structure and scope of ISO/IEC 27000 series - Information security principles and definitions 1. Risk management fundamentals 2. Confidentiality, integrity, availability
Requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022	30%	- Support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement 1. Corrective action and continual improvement 2. Internal audit and management review 3. Resource management and competence - Leadership and planning 1. Information security objectives and risk treatment planning 2. Management commitment and policy establishment - General requirements and ISMS scope definition 1. Understanding the organization and its context 2. Determining ISMS boundaries and applicability
Auditing Principles and Practices	30%	- Audit reporting and follow-up 1. Corrective action verification and closure 2. Structure and content of audit report - Audit execution 1. Collecting and verifying audit evidence 2. Conducting interviews and document reviews 3. Identifying nonconformities and opportunities for improvement - Audit concepts and principles 1. Audit types and objectives 2. Independence, objectivity and evidence-based approach - Audit preparation and planning 1. Defining audit scope, criteria and methodology 2. Development of audit plan and checklist
Information Security Controls (ISO/IEC 27002:2022)	25%	- Control categories and implementation guidance 1. Physical controls 2. Organizational controls 3. Technological controls 4. People controls

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungs <<

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Fragen und Antworten, PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Prüfungsfragen

DeutschPrüfung ist eine Website, die kurze aber effiziente Ausbildung zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung bietet. Die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung kann Ihr Leben verändern. Die IT-Fachleut mit PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifikat haben höheres Gehalt, bessere Beförderungsmöglichkeiten und bessere Berufsaussichten in der IT-Branche.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q296-Q301):

296. Frage
Which two of the following phrases would apply to "plan" in relation to the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle for a business process?

A. Setting objectives
B. Training staff
C. Retaining documentation
D. Organising changes
E. Providing ICT assets
F. Retaining documentation

Antwort: A,B

Begründung:
Explanation
The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle is a four-step method for implementing and improving processes, products, or services. The "plan" phase involves establishing the objectives and processes necessary to deliver the desired results. This may include setting SMART goals, identifying resources, defining roles and responsibilities, conducting risk assessments, and developing plans for training, communication, and monitoring.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) objectives and content from Quality.org and PECB
* ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems [Section 5.3.1]

297. Frage
Scenario 4: SendPay is a financial company that provides its services through a network of agents and financial institutions. One of their main services is transferring money worldwide. SendPay, as a new company, seeks to offer top quality services to its clients. Since the company offers international transactions, it requires from their clients to provide personal information, such as their identity, the reason for the transactions, and other details that might be needed to complete the transaction. Therefore, SendPay has implemented security measures to protect their clients' information, including detecting, investigating, and responding to any information security threats that may emerge. Their commitment to offering secure services was also reflected during the ISMS implementation where the company invested a lot of time and resources.
Last year, SendPay unveiled their digital platform that allows money transactions through electronic devices, such as smartphones or laptops, without requiring an additional fee. Through this platform, SendPay's clients can send and receive money from anywhere and at any time. The digital platform helped SendPay to simplify the company's operations and further expand its business. At the time, SendPay was outsourcing its software operations, hence the project was completed by the software development team of the outsourced company.
The same team was also responsible for maintaining the technology infrastructure of SendPay.
Recently, the company applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification after having an ISMS in place for almost a year. They contracted a certification body that fit their criteria. Soon after, the certification body appointed a team of four auditors to audit SendPay's ISMS.
During the audit, among others, the following situations were observed:
1.The outsourced software company had terminated the contract with SendPay without prior notice. As a result, SendPay was unable to immediately bring the services back in-house and its operations were disrupted for five days. The auditors requested from SendPay's representatives to provide evidence that they have a plan to follow in cases of contract terminations. The representatives did not provide any documentary evidence but during an interview, they told the auditors that the top management of SendPay had identified two other software development companies that could provide services immediately if similar situations happen again.
2.There was no evidence available regarding the monitoring of the activities that were outsourced to the software development company. Once again, the representatives of SendPay told the auditors that they regularly communicate with the software development company and that they are appropriately informed for any possible change that might occur.
3.There was no nonconformity found during the firewall testing. The auditors tested the firewall configuration in order to determine the level of security provided by these services. They used a packet analyzer to test the firewall policies which enabled them to check the packets sent or received in real-time.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 4, the auditors requested documentary evidence regarding the monitoring process of outsourced operations. What does this indicate?

A. The auditors compromised the confidentiality of outsourced operations
B. The auditors demonstrated professional skepticism
C. The auditors evaluated the evidence based on a risk-based approach

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Based on the provided scenario, the auditors' request for documentary evidence regarding the monitoring process of outsourced operations indicates that the auditors demonstrated professional skepticism. This is because professional skepticism involves a critical assessment of audit evidence and includes a questioning mind and a careful evaluation of the information provided by the auditee123.
Professional skepticism is an essential part of the auditing process, especially in the context of ISO/IEC
27001, which requires auditors to systematically examine an organization's information security risks, including the management of outsourced processes4. The auditors' request for evidence suggests that they were not satisfied with verbal assurances alone and sought to verify that SendPay had a formal, documented process for monitoring outsourced activities, which is a requirement for maintaining an effective Information Security Management System (ISMS)5.
Therefore, the correct answer is: A. The auditors demonstrated professional skepticism.

298. Frage
You are an experienced ISMS auditor, currently providing support to an ISMS auditor in training who is carrying out her first initial certification audit. She asks you what she should be verifying when auditing an organisation's Information Security objectives. You ask her what she has included in her audit checklist and she provides the following replies.
Which three of these responses would you cause you concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC
27001:2022?

A. I am going to check that the Information Security objectives are written down on paper so that everyone is clear on what needs to be achieved, how it will be achieved, and by when it will be achieved
B. I am going to check that there is a process in place to periodically revisit Information Security objectives, with a view to amending or cancelling them if circumstances necessitate this
C. I am going to check how each Information Security objective has been communicated to those who need to be aware of it in order for the objective to be achieved
D. I am going to check that all the Information Security objectives are measurable. If they are not measurable the organisation will not be able to track progress against them
E. I am going to check that a completion date has been set for each objective and that there are no objectives with missing 'achieve by' dates
F. I am going to check that top management have determined the Information Security objectives for the current year. If not, I will check that this task has been programmed to be completed
G. I am going to check that the necessary budget, manpower and materials to achieve each objective has been determined

Antwort: A,E,F

Begründung:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 6.2 requires an organization to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels1. The objectives should be consistent with the information security policy; measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated; monitored; communicated; updated as appropriate1. Therefore, when auditing an organization's information security objectives, an ISMS auditor should verify these aspects in accordance with the audit criteria.
Three responses from the ISMS auditor in training that would cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are:
* I am going to check that top management have determined the Information Security objectives for the current year. If not, I will check that this task has been programmed to be completed: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives at relevant functions and levels, not just at the top management level. It also implies that the auditor in training is willing to accept a delay or postponement in determining the information security objectives, which may affect the ISMS performance and effectiveness.
* I am going to check that the Information Security objectives are written down on paper so that everyone is clear on what needs to be achieved, how it will be achieved, and by when it will be achieved: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that are measurable (if practicable) or capable of being evaluated, not just written down on paper. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the flexibility and suitability of different media or formats for documenting and communicating information security objectives, such as electronic or digital records, posters, newsletters, etc.
* I am going to check that a completion date has been set for each objective and that there are no objectives with missing 'achieve by' dates: This response would cause concern because it implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the requirement to establish information security objectives that
* are monitored, not just completed by a certain date. It also implies that the auditor in training is not aware of the possibility and necessity of updating information security objectives as appropriate, such as when changes occur in the internal or external context of the organization, or when new risks or opportunities arise.
The other responses from the ISMS auditor in training are acceptable and do not cause concern in relation to conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022. For example, checking how each Information Security objective has been communicated to those who need to be aware of it in order for the objective to be achieved is relevant to verifying the communication aspect of clause 6.2; checking that there is a process in place to periodically revisit Information Security objectives, with a view to amending or cancelling them if circumstances necessitate this is relevant to verifying the updating aspect of clause 6.2; checking that the necessary budget, manpower and materials to achieve each objective has been determined is relevant to verifying the planning aspect of clause 6.2; checking that all the Information Security objectives are measurable. If they are not measurable the organisation will not be able to track progress against them is relevant to verifying the measurability aspect of clause 6.2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements

299. Frage
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training.
Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the PEOPLE controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and mplemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.

A. The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems
B. How protection against malware is implemented
C. Remote working arrangements
D. The organisation's business continuity arrangements
E. Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements
F. Information security awareness, education and training
G. The conducting of verification checks on personnel
H. The organisation's arrangements for information deletion

Antwort: C,E,F,G

Begründung:
The PEOPLE controls are related to the human aspects of information security, such as roles and responsibilities, awareness and training, screening and contracts, and remote working. The auditor in training should review the following controls:
* Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements (A): These are contractual obligations that bind the employees and contractors of the organisation to protect the confidentiality of the information they handle, especially the data of external clients. The auditor should check if these agreements are signed, updated, and enforced by the organisation. This control is related to clause A.7.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:
2022.
* Information security awareness, education and training : These are activities that aim to enhance the knowledge, skills, and behaviour of the employees and contractors regarding information security. The auditor should check if these activities are planned, implemented, evaluated, and improved by the organisation. This control is related to clause A.7.2.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* Remote working arrangements (D): These are policies and procedures that govern the information security aspects of working from locations other than the organisation's premises, such as home or public places. The auditor should check if these arrangements are defined, approved, and monitored by the organisation. This control is related to clause A.6.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* The conducting of verification checks on personnel (E): These are background checks that verify the identity, qualifications, and suitability of the employees and contractors who have access to sensitive information or systems. The auditor should check if these checks are conducted, documented, and reviewed by the organisation. This control is related to clause A.7.1.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, 1
* ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor - IECB, 2
* ISO 27001:2022 certified ISMS lead auditor - Jisc, 3
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Transition Training Course, 4
* ISO 27001 - Information Security Lead Auditor Course - PwC Training Academy, 5

300. Frage
You are an experienced ISMS auditor conducting a third-party surveillance audit at an organisation which offers ICT reclamation services. ICT equipment which companies no longer require is processed by the organisation. It Is either recommissioned and reused or is securely destroyed.
You notice two servers on a bench in the corner of the room. Both have stickers on item with the server's name, IP address and admin password. You ask the ICT Manager about them, and he tells you they were part of a shipment received yesterday from a regular customer.
Which one action should you take?

A. Note the audit finding and check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security
B. Ask the ICT Manager to record an information security incident and initiate the information security incident management process
C. Ask the auditee to remove the labels, then carry on with the audit
D. Record what you have seen in your audit findings, but take no further action
E. Raise a nonconformity against control 8.20 'network security' (networks and network devices shall be secured, managed and controlled to protect information in systems and applications)
F. Raise a nonconformity against control 5.31 Legal, staturary, regulatory and contractual requirements'

Antwort: A

Begründung:
Explanation
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 8.1.4, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to information security with external providers, such as customers who send ICT equipment for reclamation12 In this case, the organisation offers ICT reclamation services, which involves processing customer ICT equipment that may contain sensitive or confidential information. The organisation should have a process in place to ensure that the customer ICT equipment is handled securely and in accordance with the customer's information security requirements. The process should include steps such as verifying the customer's identity and authorisation, checking the inventory and condition of the equipment, removing or destroying any labels or stickers that contain information about the equipment or the customer, wiping or erasing any data stored on the equipment, and documenting the actions taken and the results achieved12 The fact that the auditor noticed two servers on a bench with stickers that reveal the server's name, IP address and admin password indicates that the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security is not effective or not followed. This could pose a risk of unauthorised access, disclosure, or modification of the customer's information or systems. Therefore, the auditor should note the audit finding and check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:202212 The other actions are not appropriate for the following reasons:
* A. Asking the ICT Manager to record an information security incident and initiate the information security incident management process is not appropriate because this is not an information security incident that affects the organisation's own information or systems. An information security incident is defined as a single or a series of unwanted or unexpected information security events that have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security12 In this case, the information security event affects the customer's information or systems, not the organisation's. Therefore, the organisation should follow the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, not the process for information security incident management.
* C. Recording what the auditor has seen in the audit findings, but taking no further action is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor has a responsibility to verify the effectiveness and compliance of the organisation's information security management system, and to report any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement12 Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* D. Raising a nonconformity against control 5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 5.31 requires the organisation to identify and comply with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements that are applicable to the information security management system12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's compliance with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, but
* about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* E. Raising a nonconformity against control 8.20 'network security' (networks and network devices shall be secured, managed and controlled to protect information in systems and applications) is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 8.20 requires the organisation to secure, manage and control its own networks and network devices to protect the information in its systems and applications12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's network security, but about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* F. Asking the auditee to remove the labels, then carry on with the audit is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor should not interfere with the auditee's operations or suggest corrective actions during the audit, as this would compromise the auditor's objectivity and impartiality12 The auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause
8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2

301. Frage
......

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps von DeutschPrüfung sind die unentbehrliche Prüfungsunterlagen, mit denen Sie sich auf PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierung vorbereiten. Der Wert dieser Unterlagen ist gleich wie die anderen Nachschlagsbücher. Diese Meinung ist nicht übertrieben. Wenn Sie diese Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierung benutzen, finden Sie es wirklich.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Testking: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html