偶然的なIT試験は常にあなたの勉強の目標になって、あなたの運命を変えるかもしれません。SAVE Internationalの重要な認証科目として、CVS試験に参加する人が多くなっています。我々の参考資料は試験の状況によって更新されています。それに、あなたは資料を購入したら、我々はCVS資料の更新の第一時間であなたを知らせます。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Professional Practice Requirements | - Value study facilitation - Project documentation and reporting |
| Value Methodology Overview | - Principles of Value Engineering / Value Analysis
|
| Job Plan Phases | - Development Phase
|
Xhs1991のSAVE InternationalのCVS試験トレーニング資料を利用すれば、認定試験に合格するのは簡単になります。うちのSAVE InternationalのCVS試験トレーニング資料は豊富な経験を持っている専門家が長年の研究を通じて開発されたものです。Xhs1991の学習教材は君の初めての試しでSAVE InternationalのCVS認定試験に合格するのに助けます。
質問 # 79
Which of the following activities should be prioritized during the Evaluation Phase to analyze the subject's impact?
Choose 2 answers
正解：C、D
解説：
The correct answers are B and D . The Evaluation Phase requires the VM team to apply a structured evaluation process so that ideas are judged against defined requirements rather than informal preference.
SAVE's Value Methodology Standard states that the team selects ideas with potential for value improvement while still delivering the required functions and considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) Therefore, setting baseline criteria is essential because impact cannot be measured unless the current or expected performance condition is defined first. Baselines allow future outcomes to be compared against the starting point and help determine whether the selected alternative actually improves value. Defining key performance indicators is also correct because KPIs translate subject objectives into measurable evaluation factors, such as time, quality, productivity, service level, risk reduction, cost effectiveness, or functional performance.
Option A is weak because a one-time opinion survey may provide useful input, but it does not create a disciplined impact-measurement framework. Option C is too narrow because budget review only addresses financial efficiency and does not fully evaluate subject impact. The official SAVE Core Competencies also place "establish evaluation framework" and "establish evaluation criteria" directly within the Evaluation Phase.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Evaluation Framework; Evaluation Criteria; KPI Alignment; Baseline Measurement; Subject Impact Analysis.
質問 # 80
What should the VM facilitator consider for the title of a VM proposal?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、D
解説：
The correct selections are A and C . A VM proposal title should be clear, concise, and persuasive because it is part of the communication package used to move a value alternative toward management understanding, acceptance, and implementation. In the Presentation Phase, the value team presents value alternatives to management, stakeholders, or decision makers, with the intent of helping them make informed decisions aligned with strategic objectives. The SAVE study guide identifies the Presentation Phase purpose as presenting value alternatives to management and other decision makers, and its outcome includes ensuring stakeholders understand the rationale of alternatives and generating interest to sanction implementation. ( cdn..
com )
Therefore, a concise title helps the proposal communicate its central idea quickly without obscuring the function, benefit, or decision point. Framing the title to help sell the concept is also appropriate because a VM proposal must communicate value, not merely describe a technical change. The facilitator should avoid overly specific technical language when it narrows the audience's understanding, and avoid general jargon because it weakens clarity, credibility, and decision usefulness. A strong title should express the value opportunity in management-facing terms.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; Development Phase; VM Proposal Communication; Value Alternatives; Management Decision Support.
質問 # 81
The decision makers cling to familiar ways and reject all the VM proposals. What strategy could the VM facilitator use to persuade them to reconsider their decisions?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is D. Identify how to modify behaviors in the context of the new situation . This question is testing the facilitator's understanding of resistance to change during VM implementation or decision acceptance. When decision makers cling to familiar methods and reject all VM proposals, the problem is not necessarily the technical quality of the proposals. It is usually behavioral resistance caused by uncertainty, loss of comfort, perceived risk, or attachment to existing practices.
A VM facilitator should not simply repeat the study or replace the team. The facilitator should help decision makers understand how the recommended change can be adopted in practical terms. This includes showing what behaviors, processes, responsibilities, and decision patterns need to change under the new situation.
Option A is incorrect because identifying instability may increase concern rather than reduce resistance.
Option B is inefficient and does not address the root cause. Option C is also weak because withholding information can reduce trust. The better VM facilitation strategy is to guide decision makers through the behavioral transition required for successful acceptance.
References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Change Management; Resistance to Change; Decision-Maker Acceptance; Implementation Phase.
質問 # 82
What are typical examples of evaluation criteria used for a business process study during the Evaluation Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、C
解説：
The correct answers are A. Efficiency and D. Scalability . In the Evaluation Phase, the VM team uses structured criteria to screen and rank creative ideas based on their ability to improve value while still delivering the required functions. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard defines VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team to improve value through function analysis, and it confirms that VM applies not only to products and construction projects but also to business procedures, services, manufacturing processes, and business plans . ( ) For a business process study , typical evaluation criteria focus on how well an alternative improves process performance. Efficiency is a primary criterion because business-process alternatives are commonly judged by cycle time, resource use, duplication reduction, workflow simplification, and productivity. Scalability is also typical because the improved process should remain effective as transaction volume, users, locations, or organizational complexity increase.
Environmental impact may be valid in sustainability-driven studies, construction, or product/process engineering, but it is not a typical core criterion for a general business-process VM study. Maintenance is more typical for physical assets, facilities, equipment, or technical systems. The Evaluation Phase specifically selects ideas that offer value improvement while considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Business Process Study; Evaluation Criteria; ; Scalability; Value Improvement.
質問 # 83
Which of the following are typically documented in the "accepted" VM proposal status report?
Choose 3 answers.
正解：A、B、D
解説：
The correct answers are A. Next update, D. Tracking identification number, and E. Performance impacts . In the Implementation Phase, accepted VM proposals must be tracked so that the organization can confirm whether the approved value improvement is actually being carried into execution. The VM Guide explains that implementation status reports formally document and track the status of VM proposals and are used by VM program managers to follow implementation progress. It specifically identifies a tracking identification number as the code used to track the change within the organization, and it also requires discussion of performance impacts , including any deviation from the VM team's original performance assessment. ( pdfcoffee.com ) A next update is also appropriate because implementation status reporting is not a one-time record; it is a continuing control mechanism. The guide identifies "Next update" as the date of the next implementation status update. ( pdfcoffee.com ) Option C is incorrect because the VM study presentation is an input used earlier to resolve proposals, not a documented element of an accepted proposal status report. Option B is administrative and may appear in some organizations, but the essential accepted-proposal tracking content focuses on traceability, implementation follow-up, and validated impacts.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Status Reports; Accepted VM Proposals; Tracking Identification Number; Performance Impacts; Next Update.
質問 # 84
......
CVS試験の認証資格を取得したら、あなたは利益を得られます。あなたは試験に参加したいなら、我々のCVS問題集はあなたの最高の復習方法です。この問題集で、あなたは気楽でCVS試験に合格することができます。我々の資料があったら、あなたは試験の復習を心配する必要がありません。
CVS日本語試験情報: https://www.xhs1991.com/CVS.html