P.S. Free & New JN0-352 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassTorrent: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h3xCN1hY2zECXMpoDpnCz7vgHD2Dn8px
PassTorrent Juniper JN0-352 practice test software is the answer if you want to score higher in the Juniper JN0-352 exam and achieve your academic goals. Don't let the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) certification exam stress you out! Prepare with our Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) exam dumps and boost your confidence in the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) exam. We guarantee your road toward success by helping you prepare for the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) certification exam. Use the best PassTorrent Juniper JN0-352 practice questions to pass your Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) exam with flying colors!
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol Independent Routing | 10-15% | - Routing tables, static routes and route preference - Routing instances and route selection criteria - Basic routing policy and filter operation |
| High Availability and Resiliency | 5-10% | - Graceful restart and non-stop routing - Redundancy protocols and failover mechanisms - Network resiliency design and troubleshooting |
| IP Multicast | 5-10% | - Multicast routing monitoring and troubleshooting - PIM Dense Mode, Sparse Mode and RP mechanisms - IGMP operation and configuration |
| Layer 2 Security | 10-15% | - Layer 2 firewall filters and security features - Port security, MAC limiting and storm control - DHCP snooping, Dynamic ARP Inspection and IP Source Guard |
| IS-IS | 10-15% | - Adjacency establishment, levels and metrics - Scalable enterprise deployment and troubleshooting - Configuration and route exchange |
| Tunnels and Overlays | 5-10% | - Overlay network design and connectivity - GRE, IP-IP and dynamic tunnel configuration - Tunnel types, encapsulation and operation |
| BGP | 15-20% | - Neighbor relationships and session establishment - Route advertisement, attributes and path selection - Routing policies, filtering and common troubleshooting |
| OSPF | 15-20% | - Neighbor formation, area design and LSA types - Route summarization and redistribution - Configuration, verification and troubleshooting |
| Layer 2 Switching and VLANs | 15-20% | - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP, RSTP, MSTP) operation and configuration - Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) and Virtual Chassis - VLAN concepts, configuration, trunking and tagging |
The three formats of Juniper JN0-352 practice material that we have discussed above are created after receiving feedback from thousands of professionals around the world. You can instantly download the Juniper JN0-352 Real Questions of the PassTorrent right after the payment. We also offer our clients free demo version to evaluate the of our Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) valid exam dumps before purchasing.
NEW QUESTION # 67 
You need to apply a Layer 2 firewall filter on a Juniper Networks EX Series Switch to block traffic from the source MAC address 00:12:34:56:00:07 entering the switch on ge-0/0/3. After committing the configuration, traffic from the MAC address still passes through.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct in this scenario?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The intent of this filter is to match and discard traffic from one single, specific host MAC address, which requires the source-mac-address match condition to reference the complete, exact 48-bit address using an explicit /48 mask (or no mask at all, which Junos treats as an implicit full match) so that only that one precise address is matched. As configured, the term instead specifies a /40 mask on 00:12:34:56:00:07, meaning only the first 40 bits (the first five octets, 00:12:34:56:00) are actually significant to the match, while the sixth octet is effectively wildcarded across its full range; this produces an imprecise, overly broad match criterion rather than the single-host match the administrator intended, and is a common configuration mistake that undermines the predictability and correctness of MAC-based filtering. The lesson tested here is that source and destination MAC address match conditions in Junos firewall filters must be specified with the correct, deliberate, and explicit prefix length appropriate to the intended scope - typically /48 for a single exact host
- rather than an arbitrary or miscalculated mask value. Firewall filters under family ethernet-switching are fully capable of matching on both source-mac-address and destination-mac-address, which rules out that option entirely. Layer 2 MAC-based filters function correctly on both access and trunk interface modes, so interface type is not a limiting factor here. There is no indication in the exhibit that the filter's application direction (input versus output) is reversed. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Switching - Layer 2 Security, MAC Address Match Conditions and Prefix Length Precision.
NEW QUESTION # 68
Which statement describes the purpose of an integrated routing and bridging (IRB) interface on a Juniper Networks EX Series Switch?
Answer: A
Explanation:
An integrated routing and bridging interface, configured as irb.x on an EX Series switch, is the mechanism that bridges the Layer 2 and Layer 3 forwarding planes for a given bridge domain or VLAN. By assigning an irb logical unit to a VLAN and configuring an IP address on that unit, the switch gains a routable Layer 3 gateway address that hosts within that VLAN can use as their default gateway, enabling traffic destined for other subnets to be routed off the local broadcast domain. Internally, when a frame destined for the gateway's MAC address arrives on any port belonging to that VLAN, the switch's integrated circuitry hands the packet from the Layer 2 bridging domain to the Layer 3 routing engine associated with the corresponding irb interface, and vice versa for the return path - hence the name 'integrated routing and bridging.' IRB does not eliminate the need for routing instances, which remain a separate mechanism for isolating routing tables; it does not itself perform inter-VLAN switching, since switching still happens strictly within a VLAN's own broadcast domain; and it has no relationship to trunk ports, which remain necessary for carrying multiple tagged VLANs between switches. IRB is the standard method for enabling inter-VLAN routing on a single EX Series switch without an external router. Reference topics: Junos Enterprise Switching - Routing VLANs, Configuring Integrated Routing and Bridging.
NEW QUESTION # 69
Which statement describes how Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) identifies an alternate port?
Answer: A
Explanation:
RSTP, as defined in IEEE 802.1w, introduces explicit, well-defined port roles that go beyond legacy 802.1D STP's simpler root/designated/blocking model, and the alternate port role is one of RSTP's key refinements. An alternate port is a port that receives BPDUs from a bridge other than the one through which the local switch's actual root port reaches the root bridge -- in other words, it represents a second, redundant path toward the root bridge learned from a different upstream bridge than the one currently providing the best (root port) path. Because the existing root port already provides the lowest-cost, actively used path to the root, the alternate port is deliberately held in the discarding (non-forwarding) state during normal, stable operation, functioning purely as a pre-computed, ready-to-use backup; critically, RSTP's major performance advantage over legacy STP is that if the current root port fails, the switch can transition its alternate port directly and almost instantly into the forwarding root port role without needing to pass through the lengthy listening and learning timer-based states that classic STP required, since the alternate port's suitability as a backup was already continuously verified through ongoing BPDU reception. It is not simply 'not receiving BPDUs' (an alternate port receives BPDUs continuously, just inferior ones relative to the current root port), it is not itself the least-cost path (that describes the root port), and it does not forward based on designated-port overload, which is not a concept that exists in RSTP's port-role logic at all.
NEW QUESTION # 70
What are two reasons for creating multiple areas in OSPF? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
Option A is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce the convergence time .
This is because changes in one area do not affect other areas, so fewer routers need to run the SPF algorithm in response to a change.
Option D is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce Link State Advertisement (LSA) flooding across the network. This is because LSAs are not flooded out of their area of origin.
NEW QUESTION # 71
You enable the point-to-point parameter on your OSPF interface configuration. In this scenario, what are two benefits of this action? (Choose two.)
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
Configuring interface-type p2p under an OSPF interface tells Junos to treat that interface as a point-to-point network type regardless of the underlying physical medium, which removes the interface from the standard broadcast-network state machine entirely. On a true broadcast network, two routers must first complete a Designated Router and Backup Designated Router election, wait through the associated timers, and only then proceed through 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange, and Loading before reaching Full -- a multi-step process. A point-to-point interface skips DR/BDR election altogether and proceeds directly from 2-Way into ExStart, so adjacencies form measurably faster, which is the first correct benefit. Because there is no DR on a point-to- point interface, Junos also does not generate a Type 2 Network LSA to describe the segment; the connected subnet is instead advertised as a simple stub-network entry inside the Router LSA itself, eliminating an entire LSA type from the area's link-state database and reducing its overall size, which is the second correct benefit. Point-to-point configuration is entirely incompatible with DR election, so a router configured this way cannot 'win' a DR election -- there is no DR to win.
Advertisement of the connected network happens on any operational OSPF interface irrespective of network type, so that option describes normal OSPF behavior rather than a benefit specific to the point-to-point setting.
NEW QUESTION # 72
......
The majority of people encounter the issue of finding extraordinary Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) exam dumps that can help them prepare for the actual Juniper JN0-352 exam. They strive to locate authentic and up-to-date Juniper JN0-352 Practice Questions for the Financials in Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) exam, which is a tough ask.
JN0-352 Exam Experience: https://www.passtorrent.com/JN0-352-latest-torrent.html
What's more, part of that PassTorrent JN0-352 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h3xCN1hY2zECXMpoDpnCz7vgHD2Dn8px