P.S. Free 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Itcertking: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14lr3Qs5i6UF6WuSYit-OGSu62FFX_FNE
There are EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam questions provided in EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) PDF questions format which can be viewed on smartphones, laptops, and tablets. So, you can easily study and prepare for your EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam anywhere and anytime. You can also take a printout of these ECCouncil PDF Questions for off-screen study. To improve the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam questions, Itcertking always upgrades and updates its 312-97 dumps PDF format and it also makes changes according to the syllabus of the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> 312-97 Latest Exam Registration <<
ECCouncil certification exams become more and more popular. The certification exams are widely recognized by international community, so increasing numbers of people choose to take ECCouncil certification test. Among ECCouncil certification exams, 312-97 is one of the most important exams. So, in order to pass 312-97 test successfully, how do you going to prepare for your exam? Will you choose to study hard examinations-related knowledge, or choose to use high efficient study materials?
NEW QUESTION # 58
David, a security analyst, is responsible for identifying vulnerabilities that arise due to real-time interactions with an application. His organization requires security testing that can analyze how authentication and authorization mechanisms handle requests during execution. Which security testing approach should David implement, and in which phase should it be conducted?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Vulnerabilities arising from real-time interaction with a running application-including how authentication and authorization handle requests during execution-are found with Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), performed in the Test phase against a running build. SAST examines static code, and penetration testing typically occurs later against staging/production-like targets, not as the standard Test-phase approach.
NEW QUESTION # 59
Carlos Mendoza, a DevSecOps engineer at a Mexico City retail chain, wants his organization to define, in a single collaborative document, the specific security responsibilities that shift from the cloud provider to his own team when using a managed Kubernetes service (like EKS) versus a fully self-hosted cluster. Which concept is Carlos applying?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Shared Responsibility Model explicitly delineates which security responsibilities belong to the cloud service provider (such as securing the underlying physical infrastructure and, for managed Kubernetes, the control plane) versus the customer (such as securing workloads, IAM configurations, network policies, and data), and clarifying this division is precisely what Carlos is doing when comparing a managed service like EKS to a self-hosted cluster. Zero Trust Architecture is a security philosophy requiring continuous verification of identity and context for every access request, regardless of network location, but does not itself define provider-versus- customer responsibility boundaries. The Principle of Least Privilege dictates that entities should be granted only the minimum access necessary to perform their function, a distinct concept from responsibility division between provider and customer. Defense in Depth refers to layering multiple independent security controls throughout a system, which is a general strategy rather than a delineation of provider/customer duties. Because Carlos is specifically defining what security duties shift between provider and customer for managed versus self-hosted services, the Shared Responsibility Model is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 60
Joe Adler has recently been offered a job as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and web applications for the healthcare industry. He would like to implement DevSec Hardening Framework to add a layer into the automation framework that configures operating systems and services and takes care of difficult settings, compliance guidelines, cryptography recommendations, and secure defaults. To apply DevSec Hardening Framework to the machine, he scanned the machine using Nessus scanning tool; he then checked the compliance results before using DevSec Hardening Framework. Which of the following commands should Joe use to run DevSec Hardening Framework?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The DevSec Hardening Framework is commonly implemented using Chef, and it is executed locally using the chef-solo command. The -c flag specifies the configuration file (solo.rb), and the
-j flag specifies the JSON attributes file (solo.json). Option A correctly uses both required parameters in the proper format. The other options incorrectly swap or misuse flags that are not supported by Chef- solo. Running this command applies secure configurations, compliance controls, and cryptographic standards to the target system. Executing DevSec Hardening Framework during the Operate and Monitor stage ensures that systems remain secure, compliant, and resilient against misconfiguration- based attacks.
NEW QUESTION # 61
Ethan Reynolds, a DevSecOps Engineer at Innovatech Solutions, is responsible for enforcing security measures in the company's code repositories. His team follows best practices to prevent sensitive data from being committed. One of the software developers, Lily Thompson, asked Ethan for help in making pre-commit hooks executable on her local machine. Ethan navigated to the repo's .git/hooks/ directory, removed the .sample extension from the pre-commit.sample file, and ran the chmod +x command to make it executable. The next day, while developing new features, Lily unintentionally committed code containing sensitive information. However, the pre-commit hook detected this issue and enforced security restrictions. What will be the result of this commit attempt?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When a pre-commit hook detects a violation, it rejects the commit and exits with a non-zero status-conventionally exit code 1-causing Git to abort the commit. Lily's sensitive-data commit was therefore rejected (script exit 1). Exit 0 would allow the commit, and exit codes 2/3 with warnings or manual approval are not the standard pre-commit behavior.
NEW QUESTION # 62
William McDougall has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company located in Sacramento, California. His organization has been using Microsoft Azure DevOps service to develop software products securely and quickly. To take proactive decisions related to security issues and to reduce the overall security risk, William would like to integrate ThreatModeler with Azure Pipelines. How can ThreatModeler be integrated with Azure Pipelines and made a part of William's organization DevSecOps pipeline?
Answer: B
Explanation:
ThreatModeler integration with Azure Pipelines is achieved using a bidirectional API, which allows automated and continuous interaction between the pipeline and the threat modeling platform.
This bidirectional communication enables Azure Pipelines to trigger threat modeling activities while also receiving results, risk scores, and actionable insights back from ThreatModeler. Such feedback loops are critical for proactive security decision-making during the Plan stage of DevSecOps. Unidirectional APIs or UI-based integrations limit automation and do not support continuous feedback, making them unsuitable for pipeline-driven workflows. UI-based approaches also introduce manual steps, which conflict with DevSecOps principles of automation and consistency. By using a bidirectional API, William's organization can embed threat modeling into the planning process, identify architectural risks early, and ensure security considerations are continuously enforced as part of the pipeline.
NEW QUESTION # 63
......
A generally accepted view on society is only the professionals engaged in professionally work, and so on, only professional in accordance with professional standards of study materials, as our EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) study questions, to bring more professional quality service for the user. Our study materials can give the user confidence and strongly rely on feeling, lets the user in the reference appendix not alone on the road, because we are to accompany the examinee on 312-97 Exam, candidates need to not only learning content of teaching, but also share his arduous difficult helper, so believe us, we are so professional company.
312-97 Valid Test Questions: https://www.itcertking.com/312-97_exam.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Itcertking 312-97 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14lr3Qs5i6UF6WuSYit-OGSu62FFX_FNE