Hundreds of candidates want to get the Administering Microsoft 365 and AI Services (AB-650) certification exam because it helps them in accelerating their Microsoft careers. Cracking the AB-650 exam of this credential is vital when it comes to the up gradation of their resume. The AB-650 Certification Exam helps students earn from online work and it also benefits them in order to get a job in any good tech company.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Govern and secure Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 40-45% | - Implement and manage authentication and access
|
| Topic 2: Manage and secure AI services in Microsoft 365 | 35-40% | - Enable and manage Microsoft 365 Copilot
|
| Topic 3: Configure and manage Microsoft 365 tenants and workloads | 20-25% | - Manage Microsoft 365 workloads
|
>> Original AB-650 Questions <<
Our AB-650 free demo provides you with the free renewal in one year so that you can keep track of the latest points happening in the world. As the questions of exams of our AB-650 exam torrent are more or less involved with heated issues and customers who prepare for the exams must haven’t enough time to keep trace of exams all day long, our AB-650 Practice Test can serve as a conducive tool for you make up for those hot points you have ignored. Therefore, you will have more confidence in passing the exam, which will certainly increase your rate to pass the AB-650 exam.
NEW QUESTION # 42
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that uses Microsoft Exchange. The subscription contains a mail- enabled security group named Group1 and a user named User1.
User1 has a mailbox named Mailbox1 that is 42 GB in size.
User1 is transferred to a new role and will no longer use Mailbox1.
You need to modify Mailbox1 to meet the following requirements:
Preserve access to historical email.
Enable the users in Group1 to open Mailbox1.
Enable the Group1 users to send email messages that appear to be sent from Mailbox1.
Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
Microsoft Exchange Online supports converting an existing user mailbox to a shared mailbox while retaining its historical email content. This is appropriate when the original user no longer needs direct access but other employees must continue using the mailbox.
Option C is correct because converting Mailbox1 into a shared mailbox preserves the existing email messages and enables delegated access for other users.
The mailbox contains 42 GB of data, which is below the standard 50 GB unlicensed shared mailbox limit.
Therefore, an additional mailbox license is not required solely because of its current size, provided no separately licensed features are necessary.
Option B is correct because Full Access permission allows Group1 members to open the mailbox and manage existing items. Send As permission enables them to send messages that appear to originate directly from Mailbox1.
Option E is incorrect because Send on Behalf permission displays the individual delegate ' s identity, whereas the requirement specifies that messages must appear to come from Mailbox1.
Option D is incorrect because Litigation Hold is designed for preservation and compliance purposes, not for providing collaborative mailbox access.
Option A is unnecessary for a standard shared mailbox of this size.
Therefore, converting the mailbox and granting Full Access and Send As permissions satisfies all three requirements.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/admin/email/convert-user-mailbox-to-shared-mailbox
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/collaboration/shared-mailboxes/create-shared-mailboxes
NEW QUESTION # 43
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that contains agents built by Microsoft, agents built by trusted non- Microsoft developers, agents published by your organization, and agents shared by your organization.
The agents are available across Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint.
You need to prepare a CSV audit file that contains only agents that meet both of the following conditions:
Were built by using trusted non-Microsoft developers
Are discoverable and usable in Teams
Which filter criteria should you configure?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Microsoft 365 Agent Registry provides centralized visibility into agents available within an organization.
Administrators can filter the inventory using properties such as publisher type, deployment channel, platform, and status.
Option D is correct because the requirements identify two independent filtering conditions: external publisher ownership and availability within Microsoft Teams.
The Publisher type: Third party filter identifies agents developed and distributed by external organizations rather than Microsoft or the organization ' s internal developers.
The Channel: Teams filter identifies agents deployed to Microsoft Teams, where authorized users can discover and interact with them.
Applying both filters restricts the resulting inventory to third-party agents associated with the Teams channel.
Administrators can export the filtered agent list from the Microsoft 365 admin center for auditing. The export includes relevant metadata such as the agent name, channel, publisher, publisher type, platform, and status.
Option A is incorrect because Microsoft 365 apps is not the same deployment channel as Teams.
Option B is incorrect because Your users identifies internally created or shared agents rather than third-party publishers.
Option C is incorrect because Your org identifies agents published by the organization.
Therefore, Teams and Third party are the required filter values.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/manage/agent-registry
NEW QUESTION # 44
You are configuring Microsoft Teams meeting policies for a department that recently received Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses.
Users in the department report that while they are in a live meeting, they want to use Copilot to summarize discussions and list action items in real time, but organization compliance rules prohibit saving any permanent meeting transcripts or recordings after the meeting ends.
How should you configure the Teams meeting policy assigned to these users?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In Microsoft Teams admin center, the Copilot setting within Meeting policies determines how and when Copilot can process meeting audio and whether a persistent transcript is generated.
Option B is correct because setting Copilot to "Only during the meeting" allows participants to invoke Copilot during the live meeting using temporary speech-to-text processing in volatile memory, without creating or saving a retrievable transcript file after the meeting concludes.
Option A is incorrect because setting Copilot to "On with saved transcript required" mandates that a permanent transcript be saved to OneDrive/SharePoint for Copilot to function.
Option C is incorrect because turning Cloud recording On and Copilot Off violates both requirements by allowing persistent recordings while disabling Copilot functionality.
Option D is incorrect because removing the service plan completely disables Copilot in Teams for those users rather than allowing live in-meeting usage without saved transcripts.
Therefore, setting Copilot to Only during the meeting satisfies both operational and compliance requirements.
Microsoft References:
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/copilot-teams-transcription](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/copilot-teams-transcription)
NEW QUESTION # 45
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription.
A data loss prevention (DLP) policy generates multiple alerts.
You need to review and respond to the alerts. The solution must meet the following requirements:
Investigate related DLP alerts that have correlated security signals.
Perform in-place remediation for the affected user, file, or device.
What should you use?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender XDR provides a unified incident investigation experience that correlates Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention alerts with security signals from other Microsoft Defender workloads.
Option C is correct because Microsoft Defender incidents combine related DLP alerts and security events into a single investigation context. This enables analysts to examine potentially connected activity instead of investigating each isolated alert independently.
Microsoft Defender can correlate DLP detections with signals from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, and other integrated security services.
The incident investigation experience also supports remediation actions directly against affected entities.
Depending on the relevant workload, authorization, and alert evidence, analysts can take actions such as resetting a user ' s password, disabling an account, applying a sensitivity label, removing file-sharing permissions, or isolating a compromised device.
Option A is incorrect because Activity explorer primarily provides visibility into user and data activities.
Option B is incorrect because Content explorer focuses on inspecting classified and sensitive content.
Option D is less appropriate because individual Defender alerts do not provide the same consolidated correlation and incident-management capabilities.
Option E supports DLP alert investigation but does not provide the same unified cross-product security correlation and remediation experience.
Therefore, Microsoft Defender incidents satisfy both requirements.
Microsoft References:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-xdr/dlp-investigate-alerts-defender
NEW QUESTION # 46
You need to evaluate the configuration of AU1.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra administrative units support dynamic device membership based on device attributes. AU1 uses the following membership rule:
(device.deviceTrustType -eq " Workplace " ) -and
(device.deviceOSType -in [ " Windows " , " Android " ])
Statement 1: No.
Admin1 holds the Global Administrator role. However, AU1 uses dynamic membership, which prevents administrators from manually adding or removing members. Membership is determined exclusively by the configured rule.
Additionally, Device1 is Microsoft Entra joined, corresponding to deviceTrustType = AzureAD, rather than Workplace. Therefore, Device1 does not satisfy the rule.
Statement 2: Yes.
Device2 runs Windows 11 and is Microsoft Entra registered.
Microsoft Entra registered devices have a deviceTrustType value of Workplace, and Windows matches the permitted operating system list. Therefore, Device2 satisfies both conditions and is automatically included in AU1.
Statement 3: Yes.
The planned Android devices must be Microsoft Entra registered. Registered Android devices satisfy the Workplace trust condition and, when their recorded operating system value is Android, also satisfy the OS condition.
Consequently, they are automatically added to AU1 through dynamic membership processing. Group1 membership itself does not determine AU1 membership.
Administrators should verify the actual deviceOSType value because some Android Enterprise registrations use more specific operating system identifiers.
Microsoft References:
* Manage dynamic membership in administrative units .
* Microsoft Entra dynamic membership rules and device attributes .
NEW QUESTION # 47
......
Microsoft AB-650 exam materials are successful with high efficiency and high quality to navigate you throughout the process. If you pay attention to using our AB-650 practice engine, thing will be solved easily. We have favorable quality reputation in the mind of exam candidates these years by trying to provide high quality Administering Microsoft 365 and AI Services AB-650 Study Guide with the lowest prices while the highest quality.
AB-650 Free Study Material: https://www.pass4cram.com/AB-650_free-download.html